Cargando…

Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment

Objective identification and description of mimicked calls is a primary component of any study on avian vocal mimicry but few studies have adopted a quantitative approach. We used spectral feature representations commonly used in human speech analysis in combination with various distance metrics to...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Agnihotri, Samira, Sundeep, P. V. D. S., Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar, Balakrishnan, Rohini
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089540
_version_ 1782306568092516352
author Agnihotri, Samira
Sundeep, P. V. D. S.
Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar
Balakrishnan, Rohini
author_facet Agnihotri, Samira
Sundeep, P. V. D. S.
Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar
Balakrishnan, Rohini
author_sort Agnihotri, Samira
collection PubMed
description Objective identification and description of mimicked calls is a primary component of any study on avian vocal mimicry but few studies have adopted a quantitative approach. We used spectral feature representations commonly used in human speech analysis in combination with various distance metrics to distinguish between mimicked and non-mimicked calls of the greater racket-tailed drongo, Dicrurus paradiseus and cross-validated the results with human assessment of spectral similarity. We found that the automated method and human subjects performed similarly in terms of the overall number of correct matches of mimicked calls to putative model calls. However, the two methods also misclassified different subsets of calls and we achieved a maximum accuracy of ninety five per cent only when we combined the results of both the methods. This study is the first to use Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients and Relative Spectral Amplitude - filtered Linear Predictive Coding coefficients to quantify vocal mimicry. Our findings also suggest that in spite of several advances in automated methods of song analysis, corresponding cross-validation by humans remains essential.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3945749
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39457492014-03-12 Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment Agnihotri, Samira Sundeep, P. V. D. S. Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar Balakrishnan, Rohini PLoS One Research Article Objective identification and description of mimicked calls is a primary component of any study on avian vocal mimicry but few studies have adopted a quantitative approach. We used spectral feature representations commonly used in human speech analysis in combination with various distance metrics to distinguish between mimicked and non-mimicked calls of the greater racket-tailed drongo, Dicrurus paradiseus and cross-validated the results with human assessment of spectral similarity. We found that the automated method and human subjects performed similarly in terms of the overall number of correct matches of mimicked calls to putative model calls. However, the two methods also misclassified different subsets of calls and we achieved a maximum accuracy of ninety five per cent only when we combined the results of both the methods. This study is the first to use Mel-frequency Cepstral Coefficients and Relative Spectral Amplitude - filtered Linear Predictive Coding coefficients to quantify vocal mimicry. Our findings also suggest that in spite of several advances in automated methods of song analysis, corresponding cross-validation by humans remains essential. Public Library of Science 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3945749/ /pubmed/24603717 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089540 Text en © 2014 Agnihotri et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Agnihotri, Samira
Sundeep, P. V. D. S.
Seelamantula, Chandra Sekhar
Balakrishnan, Rohini
Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment
title Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment
title_full Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment
title_fullStr Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment
title_full_unstemmed Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment
title_short Quantifying Vocal Mimicry in the Greater Racket-Tailed Drongo: A Comparison of Automated Methods and Human Assessment
title_sort quantifying vocal mimicry in the greater racket-tailed drongo: a comparison of automated methods and human assessment
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945749/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603717
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0089540
work_keys_str_mv AT agnihotrisamira quantifyingvocalmimicryinthegreaterrackettaileddrongoacomparisonofautomatedmethodsandhumanassessment
AT sundeeppvds quantifyingvocalmimicryinthegreaterrackettaileddrongoacomparisonofautomatedmethodsandhumanassessment
AT seelamantulachandrasekhar quantifyingvocalmimicryinthegreaterrackettaileddrongoacomparisonofautomatedmethodsandhumanassessment
AT balakrishnanrohini quantifyingvocalmimicryinthegreaterrackettaileddrongoacomparisonofautomatedmethodsandhumanassessment