Cargando…
Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
BACKGROUND: To identify patients in whom systematic lymph node dissection would be suitable, preoperative diagnosis of the biological invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas through the classification of these T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas into several subgroups may be warranted. In this retrospective s...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24559138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-42 |
_version_ | 1782306577446862848 |
---|---|
author | Ye, Bo Cheng, Ming Ge, Xiao-Xiao Geng, Jun-Feng Li, Wang Feng, Jian Hu, Ding-Zhong Zhao, Heng |
author_facet | Ye, Bo Cheng, Ming Ge, Xiao-Xiao Geng, Jun-Feng Li, Wang Feng, Jian Hu, Ding-Zhong Zhao, Heng |
author_sort | Ye, Bo |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: To identify patients in whom systematic lymph node dissection would be suitable, preoperative diagnosis of the biological invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas through the classification of these T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas into several subgroups may be warranted. In this retrospective study, we sought to determine predictive factors of lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 273 consecutive patients undergone surgical resection of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas at Shanghai Chest Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2012. Preoperative computed tomography findings of all 273 patients were reviewed and their tumors categorized as pure GGO, GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm), part-solid (solid parts >5 mm), or purely solid. Relevant clinicopathologic features were investigated to identify predictors of hilar or mediastinal lymph node metastasis using univariate or multiple variable analysis. RESULTS: Among the 273 eligible clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas examined on thin-section CT, 103 (37.7%) were pure GGO, 118 (43.2%) GGO with minimal solid components, 13 (4.8%) part-solid (solid parts >5 mm, five GGO predominant and eight solid predominant), and 39 (14.3%) pure solid. There were 18 (6.6%) patients with lymph node metastasis. Incidence of N1 and N2 nodal involvement was 11 (6.6%) and seven (2.6%) patients, respectively. All patients with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm) tumors were pathologically staged N0. Multivariate analyses showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for T1a lung adenocarcinomas: symptoms at presentation, GGO status, and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) titer. Multivariate analyses also showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for pure solid tumors: air bronchogram sign, tumor size, symptoms at presentation, and abnormal CEA titer. CONCLUSIONS: The patients of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components tumors were pathologically staged N0 and systematic lymph node dissection should be avoided. But systematic lymph node dissection should be performed for pure solid tumors or part-solid, especially in patients with CEA greater than 5 ng/mL or symptoms at presentation, because of the high possibility of lymph node involvement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3945801 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39458012014-03-08 Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas Ye, Bo Cheng, Ming Ge, Xiao-Xiao Geng, Jun-Feng Li, Wang Feng, Jian Hu, Ding-Zhong Zhao, Heng World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To identify patients in whom systematic lymph node dissection would be suitable, preoperative diagnosis of the biological invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas through the classification of these T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas into several subgroups may be warranted. In this retrospective study, we sought to determine predictive factors of lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 273 consecutive patients undergone surgical resection of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas at Shanghai Chest Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2012. Preoperative computed tomography findings of all 273 patients were reviewed and their tumors categorized as pure GGO, GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm), part-solid (solid parts >5 mm), or purely solid. Relevant clinicopathologic features were investigated to identify predictors of hilar or mediastinal lymph node metastasis using univariate or multiple variable analysis. RESULTS: Among the 273 eligible clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas examined on thin-section CT, 103 (37.7%) were pure GGO, 118 (43.2%) GGO with minimal solid components, 13 (4.8%) part-solid (solid parts >5 mm, five GGO predominant and eight solid predominant), and 39 (14.3%) pure solid. There were 18 (6.6%) patients with lymph node metastasis. Incidence of N1 and N2 nodal involvement was 11 (6.6%) and seven (2.6%) patients, respectively. All patients with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm) tumors were pathologically staged N0. Multivariate analyses showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for T1a lung adenocarcinomas: symptoms at presentation, GGO status, and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) titer. Multivariate analyses also showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for pure solid tumors: air bronchogram sign, tumor size, symptoms at presentation, and abnormal CEA titer. CONCLUSIONS: The patients of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components tumors were pathologically staged N0 and systematic lymph node dissection should be avoided. But systematic lymph node dissection should be performed for pure solid tumors or part-solid, especially in patients with CEA greater than 5 ng/mL or symptoms at presentation, because of the high possibility of lymph node involvement. BioMed Central 2014-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3945801/ /pubmed/24559138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-42 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Research Ye, Bo Cheng, Ming Ge, Xiao-Xiao Geng, Jun-Feng Li, Wang Feng, Jian Hu, Ding-Zhong Zhao, Heng Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas |
title | Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas |
title_full | Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas |
title_fullStr | Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas |
title_full_unstemmed | Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas |
title_short | Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas |
title_sort | factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage t1an0m0 lung adenocarcinomas |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945801/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24559138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-42 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yebo factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT chengming factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT gexiaoxiao factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT gengjunfeng factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT liwang factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT fengjian factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT hudingzhong factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas AT zhaoheng factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas |