Cargando…

Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas

BACKGROUND: To identify patients in whom systematic lymph node dissection would be suitable, preoperative diagnosis of the biological invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas through the classification of these T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas into several subgroups may be warranted. In this retrospective s...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ye, Bo, Cheng, Ming, Ge, Xiao-Xiao, Geng, Jun-Feng, Li, Wang, Feng, Jian, Hu, Ding-Zhong, Zhao, Heng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24559138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-42
_version_ 1782306577446862848
author Ye, Bo
Cheng, Ming
Ge, Xiao-Xiao
Geng, Jun-Feng
Li, Wang
Feng, Jian
Hu, Ding-Zhong
Zhao, Heng
author_facet Ye, Bo
Cheng, Ming
Ge, Xiao-Xiao
Geng, Jun-Feng
Li, Wang
Feng, Jian
Hu, Ding-Zhong
Zhao, Heng
author_sort Ye, Bo
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To identify patients in whom systematic lymph node dissection would be suitable, preoperative diagnosis of the biological invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas through the classification of these T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas into several subgroups may be warranted. In this retrospective study, we sought to determine predictive factors of lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 273 consecutive patients undergone surgical resection of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas at Shanghai Chest Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2012. Preoperative computed tomography findings of all 273 patients were reviewed and their tumors categorized as pure GGO, GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm), part-solid (solid parts >5 mm), or purely solid. Relevant clinicopathologic features were investigated to identify predictors of hilar or mediastinal lymph node metastasis using univariate or multiple variable analysis. RESULTS: Among the 273 eligible clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas examined on thin-section CT, 103 (37.7%) were pure GGO, 118 (43.2%) GGO with minimal solid components, 13 (4.8%) part-solid (solid parts >5 mm, five GGO predominant and eight solid predominant), and 39 (14.3%) pure solid. There were 18 (6.6%) patients with lymph node metastasis. Incidence of N1 and N2 nodal involvement was 11 (6.6%) and seven (2.6%) patients, respectively. All patients with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm) tumors were pathologically staged N0. Multivariate analyses showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for T1a lung adenocarcinomas: symptoms at presentation, GGO status, and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) titer. Multivariate analyses also showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for pure solid tumors: air bronchogram sign, tumor size, symptoms at presentation, and abnormal CEA titer. CONCLUSIONS: The patients of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components tumors were pathologically staged N0 and systematic lymph node dissection should be avoided. But systematic lymph node dissection should be performed for pure solid tumors or part-solid, especially in patients with CEA greater than 5 ng/mL or symptoms at presentation, because of the high possibility of lymph node involvement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3945801
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39458012014-03-08 Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas Ye, Bo Cheng, Ming Ge, Xiao-Xiao Geng, Jun-Feng Li, Wang Feng, Jian Hu, Ding-Zhong Zhao, Heng World J Surg Oncol Research BACKGROUND: To identify patients in whom systematic lymph node dissection would be suitable, preoperative diagnosis of the biological invasiveness of lung adenocarcinomas through the classification of these T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas into several subgroups may be warranted. In this retrospective study, we sought to determine predictive factors of lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas. METHODS: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 273 consecutive patients undergone surgical resection of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas at Shanghai Chest Hospital, from January 2011 to December 2012. Preoperative computed tomography findings of all 273 patients were reviewed and their tumors categorized as pure GGO, GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm), part-solid (solid parts >5 mm), or purely solid. Relevant clinicopathologic features were investigated to identify predictors of hilar or mediastinal lymph node metastasis using univariate or multiple variable analysis. RESULTS: Among the 273 eligible clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas examined on thin-section CT, 103 (37.7%) were pure GGO, 118 (43.2%) GGO with minimal solid components, 13 (4.8%) part-solid (solid parts >5 mm, five GGO predominant and eight solid predominant), and 39 (14.3%) pure solid. There were 18 (6.6%) patients with lymph node metastasis. Incidence of N1 and N2 nodal involvement was 11 (6.6%) and seven (2.6%) patients, respectively. All patients with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components (<5 mm) tumors were pathologically staged N0. Multivariate analyses showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for T1a lung adenocarcinomas: symptoms at presentation, GGO status, and abnormal carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) titer. Multivariate analyses also showed that the following factors significantly predicted lymph node metastasis for pure solid tumors: air bronchogram sign, tumor size, symptoms at presentation, and abnormal CEA titer. CONCLUSIONS: The patients of clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas with pure GGO and GGO with minimal solid components tumors were pathologically staged N0 and systematic lymph node dissection should be avoided. But systematic lymph node dissection should be performed for pure solid tumors or part-solid, especially in patients with CEA greater than 5 ng/mL or symptoms at presentation, because of the high possibility of lymph node involvement. BioMed Central 2014-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3945801/ /pubmed/24559138 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-42 Text en Copyright © 2014 Ye et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Research
Ye, Bo
Cheng, Ming
Ge, Xiao-Xiao
Geng, Jun-Feng
Li, Wang
Feng, Jian
Hu, Ding-Zhong
Zhao, Heng
Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
title Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
title_full Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
title_fullStr Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
title_full_unstemmed Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
title_short Factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage T1aN0M0 lung adenocarcinomas
title_sort factors that predict lymph node status in clinical stage t1an0m0 lung adenocarcinomas
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3945801/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24559138
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1477-7819-12-42
work_keys_str_mv AT yebo factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT chengming factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT gexiaoxiao factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT gengjunfeng factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT liwang factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT fengjian factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT hudingzhong factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas
AT zhaoheng factorsthatpredictlymphnodestatusinclinicalstaget1an0m0lungadenocarcinomas