Cargando…

Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study

BACKGROUND: It often remains unclear to investigators how their research contributes to the work of the commissioner. We initiated the ‘Risk Model’ case study to gain insight into how a Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) project and its knowledge products contribut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hegger, Ingrid, Janssen, Susan WJ, Keijsers, Jolanda FEM, Schuit, Albertine J, van Oers, Hans AM
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-8
_version_ 1782306602698670080
author Hegger, Ingrid
Janssen, Susan WJ
Keijsers, Jolanda FEM
Schuit, Albertine J
van Oers, Hans AM
author_facet Hegger, Ingrid
Janssen, Susan WJ
Keijsers, Jolanda FEM
Schuit, Albertine J
van Oers, Hans AM
author_sort Hegger, Ingrid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: It often remains unclear to investigators how their research contributes to the work of the commissioner. We initiated the ‘Risk Model’ case study to gain insight into how a Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) project and its knowledge products contribute to the commissioner’s work, the commissioner being the Health Care Inspectorate. We aimed to identify the alignment efforts that influenced the research project contributions. Based on the literature, we expected interaction between investigators and key users to be the most determining factor for the contributions of a research project. METHODS: In this qualitative case study, we analyzed the alignment efforts and contributions in the Risk Model project by means of document analysis and interviews according to the evaluation method Contribution Mapping. Furthermore, a map of the research process was drafted and a feedback session was organized. After the feedback session with stakeholders discussing the findings, we completed the case study report. RESULTS: Both organizations had divergent views on the ownership of the research product and the relationship between RIVM and the Inspectorate, which resulted in different expectations. The RIVM considered the use of the risk models to be problematic, but the inspectors had a positive opinion about its contributions. Investigators, inspectors, and managers were not aware of these remarkably different perceptions. In this research project, we identified six relevant categories of both horizontal alignment efforts (between investigators and key users) as well as vertical alignment efforts (within own organization) that influenced the contributions to the Inspectorate’s work. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant alignment efforts influencing the contributions of the project became manifest at three levels: the first level directly relates to the project, the second to the organizational environment, and the third to the formal and historical relationship between the organizations. Both external and internal alignments influence the contributions of a research project. Based on the findings, we recommend that research institutes invest in a reflective attitude towards the social aspects of research projects at all levels of the organization and develop alignment strategies to enhance the contributions of research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3946030
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39460302014-03-09 Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study Hegger, Ingrid Janssen, Susan WJ Keijsers, Jolanda FEM Schuit, Albertine J van Oers, Hans AM Health Res Policy Syst Research BACKGROUND: It often remains unclear to investigators how their research contributes to the work of the commissioner. We initiated the ‘Risk Model’ case study to gain insight into how a Dutch National Institute for Public Health and the Environment (RIVM) project and its knowledge products contribute to the commissioner’s work, the commissioner being the Health Care Inspectorate. We aimed to identify the alignment efforts that influenced the research project contributions. Based on the literature, we expected interaction between investigators and key users to be the most determining factor for the contributions of a research project. METHODS: In this qualitative case study, we analyzed the alignment efforts and contributions in the Risk Model project by means of document analysis and interviews according to the evaluation method Contribution Mapping. Furthermore, a map of the research process was drafted and a feedback session was organized. After the feedback session with stakeholders discussing the findings, we completed the case study report. RESULTS: Both organizations had divergent views on the ownership of the research product and the relationship between RIVM and the Inspectorate, which resulted in different expectations. The RIVM considered the use of the risk models to be problematic, but the inspectors had a positive opinion about its contributions. Investigators, inspectors, and managers were not aware of these remarkably different perceptions. In this research project, we identified six relevant categories of both horizontal alignment efforts (between investigators and key users) as well as vertical alignment efforts (within own organization) that influenced the contributions to the Inspectorate’s work. CONCLUSIONS: Relevant alignment efforts influencing the contributions of the project became manifest at three levels: the first level directly relates to the project, the second to the organizational environment, and the third to the formal and historical relationship between the organizations. Both external and internal alignments influence the contributions of a research project. Based on the findings, we recommend that research institutes invest in a reflective attitude towards the social aspects of research projects at all levels of the organization and develop alignment strategies to enhance the contributions of research. BioMed Central 2014-02-05 /pmc/articles/PMC3946030/ /pubmed/24498894 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-8 Text en Copyright © 2014 Hegger et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research
Hegger, Ingrid
Janssen, Susan WJ
Keijsers, Jolanda FEM
Schuit, Albertine J
van Oers, Hans AM
Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
title Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
title_full Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
title_fullStr Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
title_full_unstemmed Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
title_short Analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
title_sort analyzing the contributions of a government-commissioned research project: a case study
topic Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946030/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24498894
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1478-4505-12-8
work_keys_str_mv AT heggeringrid analyzingthecontributionsofagovernmentcommissionedresearchprojectacasestudy
AT janssensusanwj analyzingthecontributionsofagovernmentcommissionedresearchprojectacasestudy
AT keijsersjolandafem analyzingthecontributionsofagovernmentcommissionedresearchprojectacasestudy
AT schuitalbertinej analyzingthecontributionsofagovernmentcommissionedresearchprojectacasestudy
AT vanoershansam analyzingthecontributionsofagovernmentcommissionedresearchprojectacasestudy