Cargando…

Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis

BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (P...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Yang, Chong, Wu, He-Shui, Chen, Xing-Lin, Wang, Chun-You, Gou, Shan-Miao, Xiao, Jun, He, Zhi-Qiang, Chen, Qi-Jun, Li, Yong-Feng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090316
_version_ 1782306607029288960
author Yang, Chong
Wu, He-Shui
Chen, Xing-Lin
Wang, Chun-You
Gou, Shan-Miao
Xiao, Jun
He, Zhi-Qiang
Chen, Qi-Jun
Li, Yong-Feng
author_facet Yang, Chong
Wu, He-Shui
Chen, Xing-Lin
Wang, Chun-You
Gou, Shan-Miao
Xiao, Jun
He, Zhi-Qiang
Chen, Qi-Jun
Li, Yong-Feng
author_sort Yang, Chong
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD). METHOD: A systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies. Outcome measures comparing PPPD versus PRPD for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma were long-term survival, mortality, morbidity (overall morbidity, delayed gastric emptying [DGE], pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage) and operation related events (hospital stays, operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions). RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 622 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Among these patients, it revealed no difference in long-term survival between the PPPD and PRPD groups (HR = 0.23, p = 0.11). There was a lower rate of DGE (RR = 2.35, p = 0.04, 95% CI, 1.06–5.21) with PRPD. Mortality, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage were not significantly different between the groups. PPPDs were performed more quickly than PRPDs (WMD = 53.25 minutes, p = 0.01, 95% CI, 12.53–93.97); and there was less estimated intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 365.21 ml, p = 0.006, 95% CI, 102.71–627.71) and fewer red blood cell transfusions (WMD = 0.29 U, p = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.10–0.48) in patients undergoing PPPD. The hospital stays showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: PPPD had advantages over PRPD in operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions, but had a significantly higher rate of DGE for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. PPPD and PRPD had comparable mortality and morbidity including pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of high-quality RCTs are needed.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3946060
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39460602014-03-12 Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Yang, Chong Wu, He-Shui Chen, Xing-Lin Wang, Chun-You Gou, Shan-Miao Xiao, Jun He, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Qi-Jun Li, Yong-Feng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD). METHOD: A systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies. Outcome measures comparing PPPD versus PRPD for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma were long-term survival, mortality, morbidity (overall morbidity, delayed gastric emptying [DGE], pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage) and operation related events (hospital stays, operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions). RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 622 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Among these patients, it revealed no difference in long-term survival between the PPPD and PRPD groups (HR = 0.23, p = 0.11). There was a lower rate of DGE (RR = 2.35, p = 0.04, 95% CI, 1.06–5.21) with PRPD. Mortality, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage were not significantly different between the groups. PPPDs were performed more quickly than PRPDs (WMD = 53.25 minutes, p = 0.01, 95% CI, 12.53–93.97); and there was less estimated intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 365.21 ml, p = 0.006, 95% CI, 102.71–627.71) and fewer red blood cell transfusions (WMD = 0.29 U, p = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.10–0.48) in patients undergoing PPPD. The hospital stays showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: PPPD had advantages over PRPD in operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions, but had a significantly higher rate of DGE for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. PPPD and PRPD had comparable mortality and morbidity including pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of high-quality RCTs are needed. Public Library of Science 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3946060/ /pubmed/24603478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090316 Text en © 2014 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Yang, Chong
Wu, He-Shui
Chen, Xing-Lin
Wang, Chun-You
Gou, Shan-Miao
Xiao, Jun
He, Zhi-Qiang
Chen, Qi-Jun
Li, Yong-Feng
Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_full Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_fullStr Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_full_unstemmed Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_short Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
title_sort pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946060/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603478
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090316
work_keys_str_mv AT yangchong pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT wuheshui pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT chenxinglin pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT wangchunyou pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT goushanmiao pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT xiaojun pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT hezhiqiang pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT chenqijun pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis
AT liyongfeng pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis