Cargando…
Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis
BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (P...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090316 |
_version_ | 1782306607029288960 |
---|---|
author | Yang, Chong Wu, He-Shui Chen, Xing-Lin Wang, Chun-You Gou, Shan-Miao Xiao, Jun He, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Qi-Jun Li, Yong-Feng |
author_facet | Yang, Chong Wu, He-Shui Chen, Xing-Lin Wang, Chun-You Gou, Shan-Miao Xiao, Jun He, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Qi-Jun Li, Yong-Feng |
author_sort | Yang, Chong |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD). METHOD: A systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies. Outcome measures comparing PPPD versus PRPD for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma were long-term survival, mortality, morbidity (overall morbidity, delayed gastric emptying [DGE], pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage) and operation related events (hospital stays, operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions). RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 622 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Among these patients, it revealed no difference in long-term survival between the PPPD and PRPD groups (HR = 0.23, p = 0.11). There was a lower rate of DGE (RR = 2.35, p = 0.04, 95% CI, 1.06–5.21) with PRPD. Mortality, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage were not significantly different between the groups. PPPDs were performed more quickly than PRPDs (WMD = 53.25 minutes, p = 0.01, 95% CI, 12.53–93.97); and there was less estimated intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 365.21 ml, p = 0.006, 95% CI, 102.71–627.71) and fewer red blood cell transfusions (WMD = 0.29 U, p = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.10–0.48) in patients undergoing PPPD. The hospital stays showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: PPPD had advantages over PRPD in operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions, but had a significantly higher rate of DGE for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. PPPD and PRPD had comparable mortality and morbidity including pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of high-quality RCTs are needed. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3946060 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39460602014-03-12 Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis Yang, Chong Wu, He-Shui Chen, Xing-Lin Wang, Chun-You Gou, Shan-Miao Xiao, Jun He, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Qi-Jun Li, Yong-Feng PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: The aim of this meta-analysis was to compare the long-term survival, mortality, morbidity and the operation-related events in patients with periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma undergoing pylorus-preserving pancreaticoduodenectomy (PPPD) and pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy (PRPD). METHOD: A systematic search of literature databases (Cochrane Library, PubMed, EMBASE and Web of Science) was performed to identify studies. Outcome measures comparing PPPD versus PRPD for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma were long-term survival, mortality, morbidity (overall morbidity, delayed gastric emptying [DGE], pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage) and operation related events (hospital stays, operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions). RESULTS: Eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including 622 patients were identified and included in the analysis. Among these patients, it revealed no difference in long-term survival between the PPPD and PRPD groups (HR = 0.23, p = 0.11). There was a lower rate of DGE (RR = 2.35, p = 0.04, 95% CI, 1.06–5.21) with PRPD. Mortality, overall morbidity, pancreatic fistula, wound infection, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage were not significantly different between the groups. PPPDs were performed more quickly than PRPDs (WMD = 53.25 minutes, p = 0.01, 95% CI, 12.53–93.97); and there was less estimated intraoperative blood loss (WMD = 365.21 ml, p = 0.006, 95% CI, 102.71–627.71) and fewer red blood cell transfusions (WMD = 0.29 U, p = 0.003, 95% CI, 0.10–0.48) in patients undergoing PPPD. The hospital stays showed no significant difference. CONCLUSIONS: PPPD had advantages over PRPD in operating time, intraoperative blood loss and red blood cell transfusions, but had a significantly higher rate of DGE for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma. PPPD and PRPD had comparable mortality and morbidity including pancreatic fistulas, wound infections, postoperative bleeding, biliary leakage, ascites and gastroenterostomy leakage. Our conclusions were limited by the available data. Further evaluations of high-quality RCTs are needed. Public Library of Science 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3946060/ /pubmed/24603478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090316 Text en © 2014 Yang et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Yang, Chong Wu, He-Shui Chen, Xing-Lin Wang, Chun-You Gou, Shan-Miao Xiao, Jun He, Zhi-Qiang Chen, Qi-Jun Li, Yong-Feng Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title | Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full | Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_fullStr | Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_short | Pylorus-Preserving Versus Pylorus-Resecting Pancreaticoduodenectomy for Periampullary and Pancreatic Carcinoma: A Meta-Analysis |
title_sort | pylorus-preserving versus pylorus-resecting pancreaticoduodenectomy for periampullary and pancreatic carcinoma: a meta-analysis |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946060/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603478 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090316 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT yangchong pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT wuheshui pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT chenxinglin pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT wangchunyou pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT goushanmiao pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT xiaojun pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT hezhiqiang pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT chenqijun pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis AT liyongfeng pyloruspreservingversuspylorusresectingpancreaticoduodenectomyforperiampullaryandpancreaticcarcinomaametaanalysis |