Cargando…
Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women
OBJECTIVE: To determine the stiffness of the pregnant uterine cervix in vivo. METHOD: Five women in early pregnancy and six women in late pregnancy were included. The EndoFlip is a 1-m-long probe with a 12-cm-long bag mounted on the tip. The tip of the probe was inserted into the cervical canal. Sen...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091121 |
_version_ | 1782306636893782016 |
---|---|
author | Hee, Lene Liao, Donghua Sandager, Puk Gregersen, Hans Uldbjerg, Niels |
author_facet | Hee, Lene Liao, Donghua Sandager, Puk Gregersen, Hans Uldbjerg, Niels |
author_sort | Hee, Lene |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To determine the stiffness of the pregnant uterine cervix in vivo. METHOD: Five women in early pregnancy and six women in late pregnancy were included. The EndoFlip is a 1-m-long probe with a 12-cm-long bag mounted on the tip. The tip of the probe was inserted into the cervical canal. Sensors spaced at 0.5-cm intervals along the probe were used to determine 16 serial cross-sectional areas of the bag. The diameter of the cervical canal could thereby be determined during inflation with up to 50 ml saline solution. Tissue stiffness was calculated from the geometric profiles and the pressure-strain elastic modulus (EP) at each sensor site. Three parts of the cervix were defined: the uterus-near part, the middle and the vaginal part. The EP(max) was defined as the highest EP detected along the cervical canal. RESULTS: The EP(max) was always found in the middle part of the cervix. The median EP(max) was 243 kPa (IQR, 67–422 kPa) for the early pregnant women and 5 kPa (IQR, 4–15 kPa) for those at term. In the early pregnant women the stiffness differed along the cervical length (p<0.05) whereas difference along the cervix was not found for late pregnant women. A positive correlation coefficient (Spearman’s rho) was established between the EPs of the uterus-near and the middle part (0.84), between the vaginal and the middle part (0.81), and between the uterus-near and the vaginal part (0.85). CONCLUSION: This new method can estimate the stiffness along the cervical canal in vivo. This method may be useful in the clinical examination of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3946334 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39463342014-03-12 Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women Hee, Lene Liao, Donghua Sandager, Puk Gregersen, Hans Uldbjerg, Niels PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVE: To determine the stiffness of the pregnant uterine cervix in vivo. METHOD: Five women in early pregnancy and six women in late pregnancy were included. The EndoFlip is a 1-m-long probe with a 12-cm-long bag mounted on the tip. The tip of the probe was inserted into the cervical canal. Sensors spaced at 0.5-cm intervals along the probe were used to determine 16 serial cross-sectional areas of the bag. The diameter of the cervical canal could thereby be determined during inflation with up to 50 ml saline solution. Tissue stiffness was calculated from the geometric profiles and the pressure-strain elastic modulus (EP) at each sensor site. Three parts of the cervix were defined: the uterus-near part, the middle and the vaginal part. The EP(max) was defined as the highest EP detected along the cervical canal. RESULTS: The EP(max) was always found in the middle part of the cervix. The median EP(max) was 243 kPa (IQR, 67–422 kPa) for the early pregnant women and 5 kPa (IQR, 4–15 kPa) for those at term. In the early pregnant women the stiffness differed along the cervical length (p<0.05) whereas difference along the cervix was not found for late pregnant women. A positive correlation coefficient (Spearman’s rho) was established between the EPs of the uterus-near and the middle part (0.84), between the vaginal and the middle part (0.81), and between the uterus-near and the vaginal part (0.85). CONCLUSION: This new method can estimate the stiffness along the cervical canal in vivo. This method may be useful in the clinical examination of the biomechanical properties of the uterine cervix. Public Library of Science 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3946334/ /pubmed/24603859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091121 Text en © 2014 Hee et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Hee, Lene Liao, Donghua Sandager, Puk Gregersen, Hans Uldbjerg, Niels Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women |
title | Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women |
title_full | Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women |
title_fullStr | Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women |
title_full_unstemmed | Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women |
title_short | Cervical Stiffness Evaluated In Vivo by Endoflip in Pregnant Women |
title_sort | cervical stiffness evaluated in vivo by endoflip in pregnant women |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946334/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603859 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091121 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT heelene cervicalstiffnessevaluatedinvivobyendoflipinpregnantwomen AT liaodonghua cervicalstiffnessevaluatedinvivobyendoflipinpregnantwomen AT sandagerpuk cervicalstiffnessevaluatedinvivobyendoflipinpregnantwomen AT gregersenhans cervicalstiffnessevaluatedinvivobyendoflipinpregnantwomen AT uldbjergniels cervicalstiffnessevaluatedinvivobyendoflipinpregnantwomen |