Cargando…
The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
BACKGROUND: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-20 |
_version_ | 1782306686804951040 |
---|---|
author | Leppin, Aaron L Gionfriddo, Michael R Sood, Amit Montori, Victor M Erwin, Patricia J Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia Bora, Pavithra R Dulohery, Megan M Brito, Juan Pablo Boehmer, Kasey R Tilburt, Jon C |
author_facet | Leppin, Aaron L Gionfriddo, Michael R Sood, Amit Montori, Victor M Erwin, Patricia J Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia Bora, Pavithra R Dulohery, Megan M Brito, Juan Pablo Boehmer, Kasey R Tilburt, Jon C |
author_sort | Leppin, Aaron L |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reliably self-manage their health, strategies to bolster resilience in this population may be of particular value. The objectives of this systematic review are to synthesize the evidence of resilience training program efficacy in improving outcomes related to quality of life, self-efficacy and activation, and resilience and coping ability in: 1) diverse adult populations; and 2) patients with chronic conditions. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any program designed to enhance resilience in adults that measure any outcome against any comparator. We will search multiple electronic databases, trial registries, bibliographies, and will contact authors and experts to identify studies. We will use systematic review software to independently and in duplicate screen reports and extract data. We will extract characteristics of the study populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and quality/risk of bias. Primary, patient reported outcomes will be categorized into domains of quality of life, self-efficacy, and resilience. Secondary outcomes will be considered based on findings of the review. We will attempt meta-analysis by pooling standardized mean differences and minimally important differences (MIDs), when possible. Planned trial subgroup analyses are: 1) studies of patients with chronic conditions; 2) studies with placebo controls; 3) studies with similar intervention characteristics; and 4) studies with common lengths of follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to accumulate the evidence for resilience training programs in improving quality of life, resilience, and self-efficacy for care management, particularly among adult patients with chronic conditions. Its findings will be valuable to policy-makers, funding agencies, clinicians, and patients seeking innovative and effective ways to achieve patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007185. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3946765 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39467652014-03-09 The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol Leppin, Aaron L Gionfriddo, Michael R Sood, Amit Montori, Victor M Erwin, Patricia J Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia Bora, Pavithra R Dulohery, Megan M Brito, Juan Pablo Boehmer, Kasey R Tilburt, Jon C Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reliably self-manage their health, strategies to bolster resilience in this population may be of particular value. The objectives of this systematic review are to synthesize the evidence of resilience training program efficacy in improving outcomes related to quality of life, self-efficacy and activation, and resilience and coping ability in: 1) diverse adult populations; and 2) patients with chronic conditions. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any program designed to enhance resilience in adults that measure any outcome against any comparator. We will search multiple electronic databases, trial registries, bibliographies, and will contact authors and experts to identify studies. We will use systematic review software to independently and in duplicate screen reports and extract data. We will extract characteristics of the study populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and quality/risk of bias. Primary, patient reported outcomes will be categorized into domains of quality of life, self-efficacy, and resilience. Secondary outcomes will be considered based on findings of the review. We will attempt meta-analysis by pooling standardized mean differences and minimally important differences (MIDs), when possible. Planned trial subgroup analyses are: 1) studies of patients with chronic conditions; 2) studies with placebo controls; 3) studies with similar intervention characteristics; and 4) studies with common lengths of follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to accumulate the evidence for resilience training programs in improving quality of life, resilience, and self-efficacy for care management, particularly among adult patients with chronic conditions. Its findings will be valuable to policy-makers, funding agencies, clinicians, and patients seeking innovative and effective ways to achieve patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007185. BioMed Central 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3946765/ /pubmed/24602236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-20 Text en Copyright © 2014 Leppin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Protocol Leppin, Aaron L Gionfriddo, Michael R Sood, Amit Montori, Victor M Erwin, Patricia J Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia Bora, Pavithra R Dulohery, Megan M Brito, Juan Pablo Boehmer, Kasey R Tilburt, Jon C The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
title | The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
title_full | The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
title_fullStr | The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
title_full_unstemmed | The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
title_short | The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
title_sort | efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol |
topic | Protocol |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946765/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT leppinaaronl theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT gionfriddomichaelr theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT soodamit theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT montorivictorm theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT erwinpatriciaj theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT zeballospalaciosclaudia theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT borapavithrar theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT duloherymeganm theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT britojuanpablo theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT boehmerkaseyr theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT tilburtjonc theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT leppinaaronl efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT gionfriddomichaelr efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT soodamit efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT montorivictorm efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT erwinpatriciaj efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT zeballospalaciosclaudia efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT borapavithrar efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT duloherymeganm efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT britojuanpablo efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT boehmerkaseyr efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol AT tilburtjonc efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol |