Cargando…

The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol

BACKGROUND: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reli...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Leppin, Aaron L, Gionfriddo, Michael R, Sood, Amit, Montori, Victor M, Erwin, Patricia J, Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia, Bora, Pavithra R, Dulohery, Megan M, Brito, Juan Pablo, Boehmer, Kasey R, Tilburt, Jon C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-20
_version_ 1782306686804951040
author Leppin, Aaron L
Gionfriddo, Michael R
Sood, Amit
Montori, Victor M
Erwin, Patricia J
Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia
Bora, Pavithra R
Dulohery, Megan M
Brito, Juan Pablo
Boehmer, Kasey R
Tilburt, Jon C
author_facet Leppin, Aaron L
Gionfriddo, Michael R
Sood, Amit
Montori, Victor M
Erwin, Patricia J
Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia
Bora, Pavithra R
Dulohery, Megan M
Brito, Juan Pablo
Boehmer, Kasey R
Tilburt, Jon C
author_sort Leppin, Aaron L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reliably self-manage their health, strategies to bolster resilience in this population may be of particular value. The objectives of this systematic review are to synthesize the evidence of resilience training program efficacy in improving outcomes related to quality of life, self-efficacy and activation, and resilience and coping ability in: 1) diverse adult populations; and 2) patients with chronic conditions. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any program designed to enhance resilience in adults that measure any outcome against any comparator. We will search multiple electronic databases, trial registries, bibliographies, and will contact authors and experts to identify studies. We will use systematic review software to independently and in duplicate screen reports and extract data. We will extract characteristics of the study populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and quality/risk of bias. Primary, patient reported outcomes will be categorized into domains of quality of life, self-efficacy, and resilience. Secondary outcomes will be considered based on findings of the review. We will attempt meta-analysis by pooling standardized mean differences and minimally important differences (MIDs), when possible. Planned trial subgroup analyses are: 1) studies of patients with chronic conditions; 2) studies with placebo controls; 3) studies with similar intervention characteristics; and 4) studies with common lengths of follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to accumulate the evidence for resilience training programs in improving quality of life, resilience, and self-efficacy for care management, particularly among adult patients with chronic conditions. Its findings will be valuable to policy-makers, funding agencies, clinicians, and patients seeking innovative and effective ways to achieve patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007185.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3946765
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39467652014-03-09 The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol Leppin, Aaron L Gionfriddo, Michael R Sood, Amit Montori, Victor M Erwin, Patricia J Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia Bora, Pavithra R Dulohery, Megan M Brito, Juan Pablo Boehmer, Kasey R Tilburt, Jon C Syst Rev Protocol BACKGROUND: Resilience has been defined as the ability of individuals to manage and adapt to stress and life challenges. Training programs that develop and/or enhance resilience may have efficacy in improving health, well-being, and quality of life. Because patients with chronic conditions must reliably self-manage their health, strategies to bolster resilience in this population may be of particular value. The objectives of this systematic review are to synthesize the evidence of resilience training program efficacy in improving outcomes related to quality of life, self-efficacy and activation, and resilience and coping ability in: 1) diverse adult populations; and 2) patients with chronic conditions. METHODS/DESIGN: We will conduct a systematic review of randomized controlled trials assessing the efficacy of any program designed to enhance resilience in adults that measure any outcome against any comparator. We will search multiple electronic databases, trial registries, bibliographies, and will contact authors and experts to identify studies. We will use systematic review software to independently and in duplicate screen reports and extract data. We will extract characteristics of the study populations, interventions, comparators, outcomes, and quality/risk of bias. Primary, patient reported outcomes will be categorized into domains of quality of life, self-efficacy, and resilience. Secondary outcomes will be considered based on findings of the review. We will attempt meta-analysis by pooling standardized mean differences and minimally important differences (MIDs), when possible. Planned trial subgroup analyses are: 1) studies of patients with chronic conditions; 2) studies with placebo controls; 3) studies with similar intervention characteristics; and 4) studies with common lengths of follow-up. DISCUSSION: This study is intended to accumulate the evidence for resilience training programs in improving quality of life, resilience, and self-efficacy for care management, particularly among adult patients with chronic conditions. Its findings will be valuable to policy-makers, funding agencies, clinicians, and patients seeking innovative and effective ways to achieve patient-centered care. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO registration number: CRD42014007185. BioMed Central 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3946765/ /pubmed/24602236 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-20 Text en Copyright © 2014 Leppin et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.
spellingShingle Protocol
Leppin, Aaron L
Gionfriddo, Michael R
Sood, Amit
Montori, Victor M
Erwin, Patricia J
Zeballos-Palacios, Claudia
Bora, Pavithra R
Dulohery, Megan M
Brito, Juan Pablo
Boehmer, Kasey R
Tilburt, Jon C
The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
title The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
title_full The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
title_fullStr The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
title_full_unstemmed The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
title_short The efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
title_sort efficacy of resilience training programs: a systematic review protocol
topic Protocol
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946765/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24602236
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/2046-4053-3-20
work_keys_str_mv AT leppinaaronl theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT gionfriddomichaelr theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT soodamit theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT montorivictorm theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT erwinpatriciaj theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT zeballospalaciosclaudia theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT borapavithrar theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT duloherymeganm theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT britojuanpablo theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT boehmerkaseyr theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tilburtjonc theefficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT leppinaaronl efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT gionfriddomichaelr efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT soodamit efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT montorivictorm efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT erwinpatriciaj efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT zeballospalaciosclaudia efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT borapavithrar efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT duloherymeganm efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT britojuanpablo efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT boehmerkaseyr efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol
AT tilburtjonc efficacyofresiliencetrainingprogramsasystematicreviewprotocol