Cargando…

Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people

BACKGROUND: To better accommodate for the complex care needs of frail, older people, general practitioners must be capable of easily identifying frailty in daily clinical practice, for example, by using the frailty index (FI). To explore whether the FI is a valid and adequate screening instrument fo...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drubbel, Irene, Numans, Mattijs E, Kranenburg, Guido, Bleijenberg, Nienke, de Wit, Niek J, Schuurmans, Marieke J
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BioMed Central 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-27
_version_ 1782306691170172928
author Drubbel, Irene
Numans, Mattijs E
Kranenburg, Guido
Bleijenberg, Nienke
de Wit, Niek J
Schuurmans, Marieke J
author_facet Drubbel, Irene
Numans, Mattijs E
Kranenburg, Guido
Bleijenberg, Nienke
de Wit, Niek J
Schuurmans, Marieke J
author_sort Drubbel, Irene
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: To better accommodate for the complex care needs of frail, older people, general practitioners must be capable of easily identifying frailty in daily clinical practice, for example, by using the frailty index (FI). To explore whether the FI is a valid and adequate screening instrument for primary care, we conducted a systematic review of its psychometric properties. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane, PubMed and Embase databases and included original studies focusing on the criterion validity, construct validity and responsiveness of the FI when applied in community-dwelling older people. We evaluated the quality of the studies included using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. This systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Of the twenty studies identified, eighteen reported on FIs derived from research data, one reported upon an FI derived from an administrative database of home-care clients, and one reported upon an FI derived from routine primary care data. In general, the FI showed good criterion and construct validity but lacked studies on responsiveness. When compared with studies that used data gathered for research purposes, there are indications that the FI mean score and range might be different in datasets using routine primary care data; however, this finding needs further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the FI is a valid frailty screening instrument. However, further research using routine Electronic Medical Record data is necessary to investigate whether the psychometric properties of the FI are generalizable to a primary care setting and to facilitate its interpretation and implementation in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO systematic review register number: CRD42013003737.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3946826
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BioMed Central
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39468262014-03-09 Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people Drubbel, Irene Numans, Mattijs E Kranenburg, Guido Bleijenberg, Nienke de Wit, Niek J Schuurmans, Marieke J BMC Geriatr Research Article BACKGROUND: To better accommodate for the complex care needs of frail, older people, general practitioners must be capable of easily identifying frailty in daily clinical practice, for example, by using the frailty index (FI). To explore whether the FI is a valid and adequate screening instrument for primary care, we conducted a systematic review of its psychometric properties. METHODS: We searched the Cochrane, PubMed and Embase databases and included original studies focusing on the criterion validity, construct validity and responsiveness of the FI when applied in community-dwelling older people. We evaluated the quality of the studies included using the Quality in Prognosis Studies (QUIPS) tool. This systematic review was conducted based on the PRISMA statement. RESULTS: Of the twenty studies identified, eighteen reported on FIs derived from research data, one reported upon an FI derived from an administrative database of home-care clients, and one reported upon an FI derived from routine primary care data. In general, the FI showed good criterion and construct validity but lacked studies on responsiveness. When compared with studies that used data gathered for research purposes, there are indications that the FI mean score and range might be different in datasets using routine primary care data; however, this finding needs further investigation. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the FI is a valid frailty screening instrument. However, further research using routine Electronic Medical Record data is necessary to investigate whether the psychometric properties of the FI are generalizable to a primary care setting and to facilitate its interpretation and implementation in daily clinical practice. TRIAL REGISTRATION: PROSPERO systematic review register number: CRD42013003737. BioMed Central 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3946826/ /pubmed/24597624 http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-27 Text en Copyright © 2014 Drubbel et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0 This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Drubbel, Irene
Numans, Mattijs E
Kranenburg, Guido
Bleijenberg, Nienke
de Wit, Niek J
Schuurmans, Marieke J
Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
title Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
title_full Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
title_fullStr Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
title_full_unstemmed Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
title_short Screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
title_sort screening for frailty in primary care: a systematic review of the psychometric properties of the frailty index in community-dwelling older people
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3946826/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24597624
http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/1471-2318-14-27
work_keys_str_mv AT drubbelirene screeningforfrailtyinprimarycareasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesofthefrailtyindexincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT numansmattijse screeningforfrailtyinprimarycareasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesofthefrailtyindexincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT kranenburgguido screeningforfrailtyinprimarycareasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesofthefrailtyindexincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT bleijenbergnienke screeningforfrailtyinprimarycareasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesofthefrailtyindexincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT dewitniekj screeningforfrailtyinprimarycareasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesofthefrailtyindexincommunitydwellingolderpeople
AT schuurmansmariekej screeningforfrailtyinprimarycareasystematicreviewofthepsychometricpropertiesofthefrailtyindexincommunitydwellingolderpeople