Cargando…
A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant
BACKGROUND: This study was designed to find appropriate lubricant for streamed lined liner of pharyngeal airway™ (SLIPA™). We evaluated the incidence of sore throat, nausea, vomiting, hoarseness, paresthesia and blood stain after using saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lubli...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2014
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624267 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.105 |
_version_ | 1782306773898625024 |
---|---|
author | Park, Pyung-Gul Choi, Geun Joo Kim, Won Joong Yang, So-Young Shin, Hwa-Yong Kang, Hyun Baek, Chong Wha Jung, Yong Hun Kim, Jin-Yun Kang, Min-Su |
author_facet | Park, Pyung-Gul Choi, Geun Joo Kim, Won Joong Yang, So-Young Shin, Hwa-Yong Kang, Hyun Baek, Chong Wha Jung, Yong Hun Kim, Jin-Yun Kang, Min-Su |
author_sort | Park, Pyung-Gul |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: This study was designed to find appropriate lubricant for streamed lined liner of pharyngeal airway™ (SLIPA™). We evaluated the incidence of sore throat, nausea, vomiting, hoarseness, paresthesia and blood stain after using saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lublicant. METHODS: One hundred twenty three patients scheduled for minor surgery to whom the SLIPA™ was considered suitable were randomly allocated to one of three groups which receive normal saline, water soluble gel or 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lublicant. Patients were interviewed at recovery room, post operation 6-12 hour, post operation 18-24 hour about sore throat and other complications. RESULTS: There were no statistical difference in sore throat and blood stain among three groups. Also there were no statistical differences in hoarseness, nausea, vomiting. The incidence of paresthesia in 2% lidocaine gel group was significantly higher than those of the other two groups immediately after operation, but it was resolved after leaving the recovery room. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel are all available as a SLIPA™ lubricant. Size of SLIPA™, insertion technique and difficulty of insertion should be further investigated as the main causes of a sore throat and other complications which can occur after the insertion of SLIPA™. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3948436 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39484362014-03-12 A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant Park, Pyung-Gul Choi, Geun Joo Kim, Won Joong Yang, So-Young Shin, Hwa-Yong Kang, Hyun Baek, Chong Wha Jung, Yong Hun Kim, Jin-Yun Kang, Min-Su Korean J Anesthesiol BACKGROUND: This study was designed to find appropriate lubricant for streamed lined liner of pharyngeal airway™ (SLIPA™). We evaluated the incidence of sore throat, nausea, vomiting, hoarseness, paresthesia and blood stain after using saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lublicant. METHODS: One hundred twenty three patients scheduled for minor surgery to whom the SLIPA™ was considered suitable were randomly allocated to one of three groups which receive normal saline, water soluble gel or 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA™ lublicant. Patients were interviewed at recovery room, post operation 6-12 hour, post operation 18-24 hour about sore throat and other complications. RESULTS: There were no statistical difference in sore throat and blood stain among three groups. Also there were no statistical differences in hoarseness, nausea, vomiting. The incidence of paresthesia in 2% lidocaine gel group was significantly higher than those of the other two groups immediately after operation, but it was resolved after leaving the recovery room. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel are all available as a SLIPA™ lubricant. Size of SLIPA™, insertion technique and difficulty of insertion should be further investigated as the main causes of a sore throat and other complications which can occur after the insertion of SLIPA™. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014-02 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3948436/ /pubmed/24624267 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.105 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Park, Pyung-Gul Choi, Geun Joo Kim, Won Joong Yang, So-Young Shin, Hwa-Yong Kang, Hyun Baek, Chong Wha Jung, Yong Hun Kim, Jin-Yun Kang, Min-Su A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant |
title | A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant |
title_full | A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant |
title_fullStr | A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant |
title_short | A comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a SLIPA lubricant |
title_sort | comparative study among normal saline, water soluble gel and 2% lidocaine gel as a slipa lubricant |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948436/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624267 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.105 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT parkpyunggul acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT choigeunjoo acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kimwonjoong acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT yangsoyoung acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT shinhwayong acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kanghyun acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT baekchongwha acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT jungyonghun acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kimjinyun acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kangminsu acomparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT parkpyunggul comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT choigeunjoo comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kimwonjoong comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT yangsoyoung comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT shinhwayong comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kanghyun comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT baekchongwha comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT jungyonghun comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kimjinyun comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant AT kangminsu comparativestudyamongnormalsalinewatersolublegeland2lidocainegelasaslipalubricant |