Cargando…
Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Sixty pa...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
2014
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624271 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.131 |
_version_ | 1782306774802497536 |
---|---|
author | Bang, Si Ra Lee, Sang Eun Ahn, Hyun Joo Kim, Jie Ae Shin, Byung Seop Roe, Hee Jin Sim, Woo Seog |
author_facet | Bang, Si Ra Lee, Sang Eun Ahn, Hyun Joo Kim, Jie Ae Shin, Byung Seop Roe, Hee Jin Sim, Woo Seog |
author_sort | Bang, Si Ra |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group PR (propofol-remifentanil group; n = 30), and group S (sevoflurane group; n = 30). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), and respiratory resistance (Rrs) values at five different time points: 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia (supine position, T1), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (lithotomy position, T2), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum while in the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (T3), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and 3 minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum (T5). RESULTS: In both groups, there were significant increases in PIP and Rrs while Cdyn decreased at times T2, T3, and T4 compared to T1 (P < 0.001). The Rrs of group PR for T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher than those measured in group S for the corresponding time points (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory mechanics can be adversely affected during laparoscopic colectomy. Respiratory resistance was significantly higher during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia than sevoflurane anesthesia. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3948440 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39484402014-03-12 Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy Bang, Si Ra Lee, Sang Eun Ahn, Hyun Joo Kim, Jie Ae Shin, Byung Seop Roe, Hee Jin Sim, Woo Seog Korean J Anesthesiol BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group PR (propofol-remifentanil group; n = 30), and group S (sevoflurane group; n = 30). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), and respiratory resistance (Rrs) values at five different time points: 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia (supine position, T1), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (lithotomy position, T2), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum while in the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (T3), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and 3 minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum (T5). RESULTS: In both groups, there were significant increases in PIP and Rrs while Cdyn decreased at times T2, T3, and T4 compared to T1 (P < 0.001). The Rrs of group PR for T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher than those measured in group S for the corresponding time points (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory mechanics can be adversely affected during laparoscopic colectomy. Respiratory resistance was significantly higher during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia than sevoflurane anesthesia. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014-02 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3948440/ /pubmed/24624271 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.131 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bang, Si Ra Lee, Sang Eun Ahn, Hyun Joo Kim, Jie Ae Shin, Byung Seop Roe, Hee Jin Sim, Woo Seog Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
title | Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
title_full | Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
title_fullStr | Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
title_short | Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
title_sort | comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948440/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624271 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.131 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bangsira comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy AT leesangeun comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy AT ahnhyunjoo comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy AT kimjieae comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy AT shinbyungseop comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy AT roeheejin comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy AT simwooseog comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy |