Cargando…

Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy

BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Sixty pa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bang, Si Ra, Lee, Sang Eun, Ahn, Hyun Joo, Kim, Jie Ae, Shin, Byung Seop, Roe, Hee Jin, Sim, Woo Seog
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624271
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.131
_version_ 1782306774802497536
author Bang, Si Ra
Lee, Sang Eun
Ahn, Hyun Joo
Kim, Jie Ae
Shin, Byung Seop
Roe, Hee Jin
Sim, Woo Seog
author_facet Bang, Si Ra
Lee, Sang Eun
Ahn, Hyun Joo
Kim, Jie Ae
Shin, Byung Seop
Roe, Hee Jin
Sim, Woo Seog
author_sort Bang, Si Ra
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group PR (propofol-remifentanil group; n = 30), and group S (sevoflurane group; n = 30). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), and respiratory resistance (Rrs) values at five different time points: 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia (supine position, T1), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (lithotomy position, T2), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum while in the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (T3), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and 3 minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum (T5). RESULTS: In both groups, there were significant increases in PIP and Rrs while Cdyn decreased at times T2, T3, and T4 compared to T1 (P < 0.001). The Rrs of group PR for T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher than those measured in group S for the corresponding time points (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory mechanics can be adversely affected during laparoscopic colectomy. Respiratory resistance was significantly higher during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia than sevoflurane anesthesia.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3948440
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39484402014-03-12 Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy Bang, Si Ra Lee, Sang Eun Ahn, Hyun Joo Kim, Jie Ae Shin, Byung Seop Roe, Hee Jin Sim, Woo Seog Korean J Anesthesiol BACKGROUND: The creation of pneumoperitoneum and Trendelenburg positioning during laparoscopic surgery are associated with respiratory changes. We aimed to compare respiratory mechanics while using intravenous propofol and remifentanil vs. sevoflurane during laparoscopic colectomy. METHODS: Sixty patients undergoing laparoscopic colectomy were randomly allocated to one of the two groups: group PR (propofol-remifentanil group; n = 30), and group S (sevoflurane group; n = 30). Peak inspiratory pressure (PIP), dynamic lung compliance (Cdyn), and respiratory resistance (Rrs) values at five different time points: 5 minutes after induction of anesthesia (supine position, T1), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (lithotomy position, T2), 3 minutes after pneumoperitoneum while in the lithotomy-Trendelenburg position (T3), 30 minutes after pneumoperitoneum (T4), and 3 minutes after deflation of pneumoperitoneum (T5). RESULTS: In both groups, there were significant increases in PIP and Rrs while Cdyn decreased at times T2, T3, and T4 compared to T1 (P < 0.001). The Rrs of group PR for T2, T3, and T4 were significantly higher than those measured in group S for the corresponding time points (P < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory mechanics can be adversely affected during laparoscopic colectomy. Respiratory resistance was significantly higher during propofol-remifentanil anesthesia than sevoflurane anesthesia. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014-02 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3948440/ /pubmed/24624271 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.131 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bang, Si Ra
Lee, Sang Eun
Ahn, Hyun Joo
Kim, Jie Ae
Shin, Byung Seop
Roe, Hee Jin
Sim, Woo Seog
Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
title Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
title_full Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
title_fullStr Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
title_short Comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
title_sort comparison of respiratory mechanics between sevoflurane and propofol-remifentanil anesthesia for laparoscopic colectomy
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948440/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624271
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.131
work_keys_str_mv AT bangsira comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT leesangeun comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT ahnhyunjoo comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT kimjieae comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT shinbyungseop comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT roeheejin comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy
AT simwooseog comparisonofrespiratorymechanicsbetweensevofluraneandpropofolremifentanilanesthesiaforlaparoscopiccolectomy