Cargando…

Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection

BACKGROUND: Propofol is a good induction agent, but it has the disadvantage of causing pain on intravenous injection. The incidence of propofol-induced pain is approximately 70%. Palonosetron is a novel second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist. We presumed that palono...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ryu, Han-Bom, Kim, Su-Jin
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624266
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.99
_version_ 1782306777094684672
author Ryu, Han-Bom
Kim, Su-Jin
author_facet Ryu, Han-Bom
Kim, Su-Jin
author_sort Ryu, Han-Bom
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Propofol is a good induction agent, but it has the disadvantage of causing pain on intravenous injection. The incidence of propofol-induced pain is approximately 70%. Palonosetron is a novel second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist. We presumed that palonosetron would be effective in reducing the occurrence of propofol-induced pain based on similar mechanisms to other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. METHODS: Eighty patients were randomized to either Group N (0.9% sodium chloride [normal saline] 2 ml, n = 40) or Group P (palonosetron 0.075 mg, 2 ml, n = 40). Patients were intravenously given a 2 ml pretreatment solution, containing either palonosetron 0.075 mg or normal saline. Following pretreatment with 2 ml of palonosetron 0.075 mg or normal saline, we manually occluded venous drainage midarm with the help of an assistant. One minute later, we released the occlusion of venous drainage. This was followed by a 5-second propofol injection at 25% of the total calculated doses. Patients were then interviewed about whether or not they experienced propofol-induced pain. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of propofol-induced pain was 60% in the normal saline group and 27.5% in the palonosetron group. No patients in the palonosetron group experienced severe pain. The incidence of propofol-induced pain was significantly lower in the palonosetron group compared to the normal saline group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Following pretreatment with palonosetron, 72.5% of patients experienced a decrease in the occurrence of propofol-induced pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3948450
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39484502014-03-12 Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection Ryu, Han-Bom Kim, Su-Jin Korean J Anesthesiol BACKGROUND: Propofol is a good induction agent, but it has the disadvantage of causing pain on intravenous injection. The incidence of propofol-induced pain is approximately 70%. Palonosetron is a novel second-generation 5-hydroxytryptamine type 3 (5-HT3) receptor antagonist. We presumed that palonosetron would be effective in reducing the occurrence of propofol-induced pain based on similar mechanisms to other 5-HT3 receptor antagonists. METHODS: Eighty patients were randomized to either Group N (0.9% sodium chloride [normal saline] 2 ml, n = 40) or Group P (palonosetron 0.075 mg, 2 ml, n = 40). Patients were intravenously given a 2 ml pretreatment solution, containing either palonosetron 0.075 mg or normal saline. Following pretreatment with 2 ml of palonosetron 0.075 mg or normal saline, we manually occluded venous drainage midarm with the help of an assistant. One minute later, we released the occlusion of venous drainage. This was followed by a 5-second propofol injection at 25% of the total calculated doses. Patients were then interviewed about whether or not they experienced propofol-induced pain. RESULTS: Overall, the incidence of propofol-induced pain was 60% in the normal saline group and 27.5% in the palonosetron group. No patients in the palonosetron group experienced severe pain. The incidence of propofol-induced pain was significantly lower in the palonosetron group compared to the normal saline group (P < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Following pretreatment with palonosetron, 72.5% of patients experienced a decrease in the occurrence of propofol-induced pain. The Korean Society of Anesthesiologists 2014-02 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3948450/ /pubmed/24624266 http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.99 Text en Copyright © the Korean Society of Anesthesiologists, 2014 http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/), which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Ryu, Han-Bom
Kim, Su-Jin
Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
title Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
title_full Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
title_fullStr Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
title_full_unstemmed Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
title_short Analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
title_sort analgesic effects of palonosetron in the intravenous propofol injection
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948450/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24624266
http://dx.doi.org/10.4097/kjae.2014.66.2.99
work_keys_str_mv AT ryuhanbom analgesiceffectsofpalonosetronintheintravenouspropofolinjection
AT kimsujin analgesiceffectsofpalonosetronintheintravenouspropofolinjection