Cargando…

Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of more intensive smoking cessation interventions compared to less intensive interventions on smoking cessation in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions was cond...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nagrebetsky, Alexander, Brettell, Rachel, Roberts, Nia, Farmer, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: BMJ Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004107
_version_ 1782306803711737856
author Nagrebetsky, Alexander
Brettell, Rachel
Roberts, Nia
Farmer, Andrew
author_facet Nagrebetsky, Alexander
Brettell, Rachel
Roberts, Nia
Farmer, Andrew
author_sort Nagrebetsky, Alexander
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of more intensive smoking cessation interventions compared to less intensive interventions on smoking cessation in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions was conducted. Electronic searches were carried out on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO to September 2013. Searches were supplemented by review of trial registries and references from identified trials. Citations and full-text articles were screened by two reviewers. A random-effect Mantel-Haenszel model was used to pool data. SETTING: Primary, secondary and tertiary care. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Smoking cessation interventions or medication (more intensive interventions) compared to usual care, counselling or optional medication (less intensive interventions). OUTCOME MEASURES: Biochemically verified smoking cessation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and effects on glycaemic control. We also carried out a pooled analysis of self-reported smoking cessation outcomes. RESULTS: We screened 1783 citations and reviewed seven articles reporting eight trials in 872 participants. All trials were of 6 months duration. Three trials included pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. The risk ratio of biochemically verified smoking cessation was 1.32 (95% CI 0.23 to 7.43) for the more intensive interventions compared to less intensive interventions with significant heterogeneity (I(2)=76%). Only one trial reported measures of glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS: There is an absence of evidence of efficacy for more intensive smoking cessation interventions in people with diabetes. The more intensive strategies tested in trials to date include interventions used in the general population, adding in diabetes-specific education about increased risk. Future research should focus on multicomponent smoking cessation interventions carried out over a period of at least 1 year, and also assess impact on glycaemic control.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3948637
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher BMJ Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39486372014-03-12 Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials Nagrebetsky, Alexander Brettell, Rachel Roberts, Nia Farmer, Andrew BMJ Open Diabetes and Endocrinology OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the effects of more intensive smoking cessation interventions compared to less intensive interventions on smoking cessation in people with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. DESIGN: A systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised trials of smoking cessation interventions was conducted. Electronic searches were carried out on the following databases: MEDLINE, EMBASE, CINAHL and PsycINFO to September 2013. Searches were supplemented by review of trial registries and references from identified trials. Citations and full-text articles were screened by two reviewers. A random-effect Mantel-Haenszel model was used to pool data. SETTING: Primary, secondary and tertiary care. PARTICIPANTS: Adults with type 1 or type 2 diabetes. INTERVENTIONS: Smoking cessation interventions or medication (more intensive interventions) compared to usual care, counselling or optional medication (less intensive interventions). OUTCOME MEASURES: Biochemically verified smoking cessation was the primary outcome. Secondary outcomes were adverse events and effects on glycaemic control. We also carried out a pooled analysis of self-reported smoking cessation outcomes. RESULTS: We screened 1783 citations and reviewed seven articles reporting eight trials in 872 participants. All trials were of 6 months duration. Three trials included pharmacotherapy for smoking cessation. The risk ratio of biochemically verified smoking cessation was 1.32 (95% CI 0.23 to 7.43) for the more intensive interventions compared to less intensive interventions with significant heterogeneity (I(2)=76%). Only one trial reported measures of glycaemic control. CONCLUSIONS: There is an absence of evidence of efficacy for more intensive smoking cessation interventions in people with diabetes. The more intensive strategies tested in trials to date include interventions used in the general population, adding in diabetes-specific education about increased risk. Future research should focus on multicomponent smoking cessation interventions carried out over a period of at least 1 year, and also assess impact on glycaemic control. BMJ Publishing Group 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3948637/ /pubmed/24604481 http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004107 Text en Published by the BMJ Publishing Group Limited. For permission to use (where not already granted under a licence) please go to http://group.bmj.com/group/rights-licensing/permissions This is an Open Access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 3.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/
spellingShingle Diabetes and Endocrinology
Nagrebetsky, Alexander
Brettell, Rachel
Roberts, Nia
Farmer, Andrew
Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
title Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
title_full Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
title_fullStr Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
title_full_unstemmed Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
title_short Smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
title_sort smoking cessation in adults with diabetes: a systematic review and meta-analysis of data from randomised controlled trials
topic Diabetes and Endocrinology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948637/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24604481
http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmjopen-2013-004107
work_keys_str_mv AT nagrebetskyalexander smokingcessationinadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdatafromrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT brettellrachel smokingcessationinadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdatafromrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT robertsnia smokingcessationinadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdatafromrandomisedcontrolledtrials
AT farmerandrew smokingcessationinadultswithdiabetesasystematicreviewandmetaanalysisofdatafromrandomisedcontrolledtrials