Cargando…
A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments
BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to introduce a new device specifically designed to evaluate the cutting efficiency of mechanically driven endodontic instruments. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty new Reciproc R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany) files were used to be investigated in the new device dev...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
International Scientific Literature, Inc.
2014
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603777 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890119 |
_version_ | 1782306850029436928 |
---|---|
author | Rubini, Alessio Giansiracusa Plotino, Gianluca Al-Sudani, Dina Grande, Nicola M. Putorti, Ermanno Sonnino, GianPaolo Cotti, Elisabetta Testarelli, Luca Gambarini, Gianluca |
author_facet | Rubini, Alessio Giansiracusa Plotino, Gianluca Al-Sudani, Dina Grande, Nicola M. Putorti, Ermanno Sonnino, GianPaolo Cotti, Elisabetta Testarelli, Luca Gambarini, Gianluca |
author_sort | Rubini, Alessio Giansiracusa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to introduce a new device specifically designed to evaluate the cutting efficiency of mechanically driven endodontic instruments. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty new Reciproc R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany) files were used to be investigated in the new device developed to test the cutting ability of endodontic instruments. The device consists of a main frame to which a mobile plastic support for the hand-piece is connected and a stainless-steel block containing a Plexiglas block against which the cutting efficiency of the instruments was tested. The length of the block cut in 1 minute was measured in a computerized program with a precision of 0.1mm. The instruments were activated by using a torque-controlled motor (Silver Reciproc; VDW, Munich, Germany) in a reciprocating movement by the “Reciproc ALL” program (Group 1) and in counter-clockwise rotation at 300 rpm (Group 2). Mean and standard deviations of each group were calculated and data were statistically analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test (P<0.05). RESULTS: Reciproc in reciprocation (Group 1) mean cut in the Plexiglas block was 8.6 mm (SD=0.6 mm), while Reciproc in rotation mean cut was 8.9 mm (SD=0.7 mm). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups investigated (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cutting testing device evaluated in the present study was reliable and easy to use and may be effectively used to test cutting efficiency of both rotary and reciprocating mechanical endodontic instruments. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3948890 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | International Scientific Literature, Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39488902014-03-12 A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments Rubini, Alessio Giansiracusa Plotino, Gianluca Al-Sudani, Dina Grande, Nicola M. Putorti, Ermanno Sonnino, GianPaolo Cotti, Elisabetta Testarelli, Luca Gambarini, Gianluca Med Sci Monit BACKGROUND: The purpose of the present study was to introduce a new device specifically designed to evaluate the cutting efficiency of mechanically driven endodontic instruments. MATERIAL/METHODS: Twenty new Reciproc R25 (VDW, Munich, Germany) files were used to be investigated in the new device developed to test the cutting ability of endodontic instruments. The device consists of a main frame to which a mobile plastic support for the hand-piece is connected and a stainless-steel block containing a Plexiglas block against which the cutting efficiency of the instruments was tested. The length of the block cut in 1 minute was measured in a computerized program with a precision of 0.1mm. The instruments were activated by using a torque-controlled motor (Silver Reciproc; VDW, Munich, Germany) in a reciprocating movement by the “Reciproc ALL” program (Group 1) and in counter-clockwise rotation at 300 rpm (Group 2). Mean and standard deviations of each group were calculated and data were statistically analyzed with a one-way ANOVA test (P<0.05). RESULTS: Reciproc in reciprocation (Group 1) mean cut in the Plexiglas block was 8.6 mm (SD=0.6 mm), while Reciproc in rotation mean cut was 8.9 mm (SD=0.7 mm). There was no statistically significant difference between the 2 groups investigated (P>0.05). CONCLUSIONS: The cutting testing device evaluated in the present study was reliable and easy to use and may be effectively used to test cutting efficiency of both rotary and reciprocating mechanical endodontic instruments. International Scientific Literature, Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3948890/ /pubmed/24603777 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890119 Text en © Med Sci Monit, 2014 This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs 3.0 Unported License |
spellingShingle | Rubini, Alessio Giansiracusa Plotino, Gianluca Al-Sudani, Dina Grande, Nicola M. Putorti, Ermanno Sonnino, GianPaolo Cotti, Elisabetta Testarelli, Luca Gambarini, Gianluca A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
title | A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
title_full | A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
title_fullStr | A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
title_full_unstemmed | A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
title_short | A new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
title_sort | new device to test cutting efficiency of mechanical endodontic instruments |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3948890/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24603777 http://dx.doi.org/10.12659/MSM.890119 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT rubinialessiogiansiracusa anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT plotinogianluca anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT alsudanidina anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT grandenicolam anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT putortiermanno anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT sonninogianpaolo anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT cottielisabetta anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT testarelliluca anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT gambarinigianluca anewdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT rubinialessiogiansiracusa newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT plotinogianluca newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT alsudanidina newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT grandenicolam newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT putortiermanno newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT sonninogianpaolo newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT cottielisabetta newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT testarelliluca newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments AT gambarinigianluca newdevicetotestcuttingefficiencyofmechanicalendodonticinstruments |