Cargando…
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developi...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201 |
_version_ | 1782306877150855168 |
---|---|
author | Foulkes, Lucy Viding, Essi McCrory, Eamon Neumann, Craig S. |
author_facet | Foulkes, Lucy Viding, Essi McCrory, Eamon Neumann, Craig S. |
author_sort | Foulkes, Lucy |
collection | PubMed |
description | Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N = 305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N = 505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RSMEA = 0.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes, and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3949132 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39491322014-03-20 Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation Foulkes, Lucy Viding, Essi McCrory, Eamon Neumann, Craig S. Front Psychol Psychology Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N = 305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N = 505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RSMEA = 0.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes, and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3949132/ /pubmed/24653711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201 Text en Copyright © 2014 Foulkes, Viding, McCrory and Neumann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Foulkes, Lucy Viding, Essi McCrory, Eamon Neumann, Craig S. Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation |
title | Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation |
title_full | Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation |
title_fullStr | Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation |
title_full_unstemmed | Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation |
title_short | Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation |
title_sort | social reward questionnaire (srq): development and validation |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949132/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT foulkeslucy socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation AT vidingessi socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation AT mccroryeamon socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation AT neumanncraigs socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation |