Cargando…

Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation

Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Foulkes, Lucy, Viding, Essi, McCrory, Eamon, Neumann, Craig S.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201
_version_ 1782306877150855168
author Foulkes, Lucy
Viding, Essi
McCrory, Eamon
Neumann, Craig S.
author_facet Foulkes, Lucy
Viding, Essi
McCrory, Eamon
Neumann, Craig S.
author_sort Foulkes, Lucy
collection PubMed
description Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N = 305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N = 505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RSMEA = 0.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes, and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3949132
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39491322014-03-20 Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation Foulkes, Lucy Viding, Essi McCrory, Eamon Neumann, Craig S. Front Psychol Psychology Human beings seek out social interactions as a source of reward. To date, there have been limited attempts to identify different forms of social reward, and little is known about how the value of social rewards might vary between individuals. This study aimed to address both these issues by developing the Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ), a measure of individual differences in the value of different social rewards. Exploratory factor analysis (EFA) was run on an initial set of 75 items (N = 305). Based on this analysis, confirmatory factor analysis (CFA) was then conducted on a second sample (N = 505) with a refined 23-item scale. This analysis was used to test a six-factor structure, which resulted in good model fit (CFI = 0.96, RSMEA = 0.07). The factors represent six subscales of social reward defined as follows: Admiration; Negative Social Potency; Passivity; Prosocial Interactions; Sexual Reward; and Sociability. All subscales demonstrated good test-retest reliability and internal consistency. Each subscale also showed a distinct pattern of associations with external correlates measuring personality traits, attitudes, and goals, thus demonstrating construct validity. Taken together, the findings suggest that the SRQ is a reliable, valid measure that can be used to assess individual differences in the value experienced from different social rewards. Frontiers Media S.A. 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3949132/ /pubmed/24653711 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201 Text en Copyright © 2014 Foulkes, Viding, McCrory and Neumann. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) or licensor are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Foulkes, Lucy
Viding, Essi
McCrory, Eamon
Neumann, Craig S.
Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
title Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
title_full Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
title_fullStr Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
title_full_unstemmed Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
title_short Social Reward Questionnaire (SRQ): development and validation
title_sort social reward questionnaire (srq): development and validation
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3949132/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653711
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00201
work_keys_str_mv AT foulkeslucy socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT vidingessi socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT mccroryeamon socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation
AT neumanncraigs socialrewardquestionnairesrqdevelopmentandvalidation