Cargando…
Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds
The volumetric method of ‘convex hulling’ has recently been put forward as a mass prediction technique for fossil vertebrates. Convex hulling involves the calculation of minimum convex hull volumes (vol (CH)) from the complete mounted skeletons of modern museum specimens, which are subsequently regr...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091691 |
_version_ | 1782306956722044928 |
---|---|
author | Brassey, Charlotte A. Sellers, William I. |
author_facet | Brassey, Charlotte A. Sellers, William I. |
author_sort | Brassey, Charlotte A. |
collection | PubMed |
description | The volumetric method of ‘convex hulling’ has recently been put forward as a mass prediction technique for fossil vertebrates. Convex hulling involves the calculation of minimum convex hull volumes (vol (CH)) from the complete mounted skeletons of modern museum specimens, which are subsequently regressed against body mass (M (b)) to derive predictive equations for extinct species. The convex hulling technique has recently been applied to estimate body mass in giant sauropods and fossil ratites, however the biomechanical signal contained within vol (CH) has remained unclear. Specifically, when vol (CH) scaling departs from isometry in a group of vertebrates, how might this be interpreted? Here we derive predictive equations for primates, non-primate mammals and birds and compare the scaling behaviour of M (b) to vol (CH) between groups. We find predictive equations to be characterised by extremely high correlation coefficients (r (2) = 0.97–0.99) and low mean percentage prediction error (11–20%). Results suggest non-primate mammals scale body mass to vol (CH) isometrically (b = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.85–1.00, p = 0.08). Birds scale body mass to vol (CH) with negative allometry (b = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.70–0.91, p = 0.011) and apparent density (vol (CH)/M (b)) therefore decreases with mass (r (2) = 0.36, p<0.05). In contrast, primates scale body mass to vol (CH) with positive allometry (b = 1.07, 95%CI = 1.01–1.12, p = 0.05) and apparent density therefore increases with size (r (2) = 0.46, p = 0.025). We interpret such departures from isometry in the context of the ‘missing mass’ of soft tissues that are excluded from the convex hulling process. We conclude that the convex hulling technique can be justifiably applied to the fossil record when a large proportion of the skeleton is preserved. However we emphasise the need for future studies to quantify interspecific variation in the distribution of soft tissues such as muscle, integument and body fat. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3950251 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39502512014-03-12 Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds Brassey, Charlotte A. Sellers, William I. PLoS One Research Article The volumetric method of ‘convex hulling’ has recently been put forward as a mass prediction technique for fossil vertebrates. Convex hulling involves the calculation of minimum convex hull volumes (vol (CH)) from the complete mounted skeletons of modern museum specimens, which are subsequently regressed against body mass (M (b)) to derive predictive equations for extinct species. The convex hulling technique has recently been applied to estimate body mass in giant sauropods and fossil ratites, however the biomechanical signal contained within vol (CH) has remained unclear. Specifically, when vol (CH) scaling departs from isometry in a group of vertebrates, how might this be interpreted? Here we derive predictive equations for primates, non-primate mammals and birds and compare the scaling behaviour of M (b) to vol (CH) between groups. We find predictive equations to be characterised by extremely high correlation coefficients (r (2) = 0.97–0.99) and low mean percentage prediction error (11–20%). Results suggest non-primate mammals scale body mass to vol (CH) isometrically (b = 0.92, 95%CI = 0.85–1.00, p = 0.08). Birds scale body mass to vol (CH) with negative allometry (b = 0.81, 95%CI = 0.70–0.91, p = 0.011) and apparent density (vol (CH)/M (b)) therefore decreases with mass (r (2) = 0.36, p<0.05). In contrast, primates scale body mass to vol (CH) with positive allometry (b = 1.07, 95%CI = 1.01–1.12, p = 0.05) and apparent density therefore increases with size (r (2) = 0.46, p = 0.025). We interpret such departures from isometry in the context of the ‘missing mass’ of soft tissues that are excluded from the convex hulling process. We conclude that the convex hulling technique can be justifiably applied to the fossil record when a large proportion of the skeleton is preserved. However we emphasise the need for future studies to quantify interspecific variation in the distribution of soft tissues such as muscle, integument and body fat. Public Library of Science 2014-03-11 /pmc/articles/PMC3950251/ /pubmed/24618736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091691 Text en © 2014 Brassey, Sellers http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Brassey, Charlotte A. Sellers, William I. Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds |
title | Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds |
title_full | Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds |
title_fullStr | Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds |
title_full_unstemmed | Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds |
title_short | Scaling of Convex Hull Volume to Body Mass in Modern Primates, Non-Primate Mammals and Birds |
title_sort | scaling of convex hull volume to body mass in modern primates, non-primate mammals and birds |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950251/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24618736 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091691 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brasseycharlottea scalingofconvexhullvolumetobodymassinmodernprimatesnonprimatemammalsandbirds AT sellerswilliami scalingofconvexhullvolumetobodymassinmodernprimatesnonprimatemammalsandbirds |