Cargando…

Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study

BACKGROUND: circumcision in children is a painful procedure. We aim compare the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy of three different surgical procedures of the ring block using levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with rectal paracetamol as opposed to rectal paracetamol alone. METHODS: the study i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zavras, Nick, Tsamoudaki, Stella, Christianakis, Efstratios, Schizas, Demetrios, Pikoulis, Emmanuel, Kyritsi, Helen, Chrousos, George
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665239
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125936
_version_ 1782306986577100800
author Zavras, Nick
Tsamoudaki, Stella
Christianakis, Efstratios
Schizas, Demetrios
Pikoulis, Emmanuel
Kyritsi, Helen
Chrousos, George
author_facet Zavras, Nick
Tsamoudaki, Stella
Christianakis, Efstratios
Schizas, Demetrios
Pikoulis, Emmanuel
Kyritsi, Helen
Chrousos, George
author_sort Zavras, Nick
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: circumcision in children is a painful procedure. We aim compare the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy of three different surgical procedures of the ring block using levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with rectal paracetamol as opposed to rectal paracetamol alone. METHODS: the study included 106 boys scheduled to undergo circumcision. The patients were randomly assigned within two groups to receive either ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and rectal paracetamol 30 mg/kg, or rectal paracetamol 30 mg/kg alone. The following surgical procedures were performed: sutureless proctoplasty, preputial plasty, and conventional circumcision. The efficacy of intraoperative analgesia was estimated on the basis of increases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure. Postoperatively, children were assessed for pain, pain-free (PF) period, and the total doses of analgesics administered during hospitalization, on the day after discharge, and on the first and second postoperative days. RESULTS: all children remained stable during anesthesia. Postoperatively, the mean pain score did not show statistical differences between the groups. Children who received combined analgesia had a longer PF period (P < 0.001). However, the total doses of paracetamol administered during the observational period showed no differences. Children undergoing sutureless prepuceplasty received lower doses of paracetamol postoperatively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: subcutaneous ring block either with levobupivacaine 0.25% plus rectal paracetamol or rectal paracetamol alone provides adequate intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in circumcised children. However, combined analgesia allows a longer PF period. The need for less analgesic administration in children undergoing sutureless prepuceplasty could mean that the circumcision techniques might be a mitigating factor in terms of pain.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3950452
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39504522014-03-24 Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study Zavras, Nick Tsamoudaki, Stella Christianakis, Efstratios Schizas, Demetrios Pikoulis, Emmanuel Kyritsi, Helen Chrousos, George Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: circumcision in children is a painful procedure. We aim compare the intraoperative and postoperative efficacy of three different surgical procedures of the ring block using levobupivacaine 0.25% combined with rectal paracetamol as opposed to rectal paracetamol alone. METHODS: the study included 106 boys scheduled to undergo circumcision. The patients were randomly assigned within two groups to receive either ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and rectal paracetamol 30 mg/kg, or rectal paracetamol 30 mg/kg alone. The following surgical procedures were performed: sutureless proctoplasty, preputial plasty, and conventional circumcision. The efficacy of intraoperative analgesia was estimated on the basis of increases in heart rate and mean arterial pressure. Postoperatively, children were assessed for pain, pain-free (PF) period, and the total doses of analgesics administered during hospitalization, on the day after discharge, and on the first and second postoperative days. RESULTS: all children remained stable during anesthesia. Postoperatively, the mean pain score did not show statistical differences between the groups. Children who received combined analgesia had a longer PF period (P < 0.001). However, the total doses of paracetamol administered during the observational period showed no differences. Children undergoing sutureless prepuceplasty received lower doses of paracetamol postoperatively (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: subcutaneous ring block either with levobupivacaine 0.25% plus rectal paracetamol or rectal paracetamol alone provides adequate intraoperative and postoperative analgesia in circumcised children. However, combined analgesia allows a longer PF period. The need for less analgesic administration in children undergoing sutureless prepuceplasty could mean that the circumcision techniques might be a mitigating factor in terms of pain. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3950452/ /pubmed/24665239 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125936 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Zavras, Nick
Tsamoudaki, Stella
Christianakis, Efstratios
Schizas, Demetrios
Pikoulis, Emmanuel
Kyritsi, Helen
Chrousos, George
Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study
title Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study
title_full Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study
title_fullStr Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study
title_full_unstemmed Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study
title_short Ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: A prospective randomized study
title_sort ring block with levobupivacaine 0.25% and paracetamol vs. paracetamol alone in children submitted to three different surgical techniques of circumcision: a prospective randomized study
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950452/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665239
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125936
work_keys_str_mv AT zavrasnick ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT tsamoudakistella ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT christianakisefstratios ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT schizasdemetrios ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT pikoulisemmanuel ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT kyritsihelen ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy
AT chrousosgeorge ringblockwithlevobupivacaine025andparacetamolvsparacetamolaloneinchildrensubmittedtothreedifferentsurgicaltechniquesofcircumcisionaprospectiverandomizedstudy