Cargando…

Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations

BACKGROUND: The low-dose ropivacaine provides differential spinal block to reduce adverse hemodynamic effects in elderly patients. Addition of intrathecal fentanyl with ropivacaine may enhance analgesia and early postoperative mobility. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of int...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Chaudhary, A., Bogra, J., Singh, P. K., Saxena, S., Chandra, G., Verma, R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125951
_version_ 1782306988619726848
author Chaudhary, A.
Bogra, J.
Singh, P. K.
Saxena, S.
Chandra, G.
Verma, R.
author_facet Chaudhary, A.
Bogra, J.
Singh, P. K.
Saxena, S.
Chandra, G.
Verma, R.
author_sort Chaudhary, A.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The low-dose ropivacaine provides differential spinal block to reduce adverse hemodynamic effects in elderly patients. Addition of intrathecal fentanyl with ropivacaine may enhance analgesia and early postoperative mobility. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl in transurethral resection operation. METHODS: Sixty male patients aged >50 years of ASA I-III scheduled for elective transurethral resection were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study and they were divided in two groups of 30 each. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal injection of ropivacaine 2 ml (0.75%) and Group B (n = 30) ropivacaine 1.8 ml (0.75%) with fentanyl 10 μg. The characteristics of onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic stability, and side effects were observed. Student's t test (for parametric data) and Mann-Whitney U test (for non-parametric data) were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, side effects, and satisfaction to patients and surgeon. The highest level of sensory block was at T10 in group A and T9 in group B (P = 0.001). Duration of motor block was longer in group B being 210.51 ± 61.25 min than in group A being 286.25 ± 55.65 min (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine may offer the advantage of shorter duration of complete motor block, hemodynamic stability, and without any increase in the frequency of major side effects.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3950461
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39504612014-03-24 Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations Chaudhary, A. Bogra, J. Singh, P. K. Saxena, S. Chandra, G. Verma, R. Saudi J Anaesth Original Article BACKGROUND: The low-dose ropivacaine provides differential spinal block to reduce adverse hemodynamic effects in elderly patients. Addition of intrathecal fentanyl with ropivacaine may enhance analgesia and early postoperative mobility. The present study was performed to evaluate the efficacy of intrathecal ropivacaine alone and in combination with fentanyl in transurethral resection operation. METHODS: Sixty male patients aged >50 years of ASA I-III scheduled for elective transurethral resection were included in a prospective, randomized, double-blinded study and they were divided in two groups of 30 each. Group A (n = 30) received intrathecal injection of ropivacaine 2 ml (0.75%) and Group B (n = 30) ropivacaine 1.8 ml (0.75%) with fentanyl 10 μg. The characteristics of onset and regression of sensory and motor blockade, hemodynamic stability, and side effects were observed. Student's t test (for parametric data) and Mann-Whitney U test (for non-parametric data) were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: There were no significant differences between the two groups for patient demographic data, intraoperative hemodynamic parameters, side effects, and satisfaction to patients and surgeon. The highest level of sensory block was at T10 in group A and T9 in group B (P = 0.001). Duration of motor block was longer in group B being 210.51 ± 61.25 min than in group A being 286.25 ± 55.65 min (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: The addition of fentanyl to ropivacaine may offer the advantage of shorter duration of complete motor block, hemodynamic stability, and without any increase in the frequency of major side effects. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3950461/ /pubmed/24665247 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125951 Text en Copyright: © Saudi Journal of Anaesthesia http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Chaudhary, A.
Bogra, J.
Singh, P. K.
Saxena, S.
Chandra, G.
Verma, R.
Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_full Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_fullStr Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_full_unstemmed Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_short Efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
title_sort efficacy of spinal ropivacaine versus ropivacaine with fentanyl in transurethral resection operations
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950461/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24665247
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1658-354X.125951
work_keys_str_mv AT chaudharya efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT bograj efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT singhpk efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT saxenas efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT chandrag efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations
AT vermar efficacyofspinalropivacaineversusropivacainewithfentanylintransurethralresectionoperations