Cargando…

Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells

Despite current advances in therapy, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma has not improved sufficiently in recent decades. This is due mainly to the highly invasive capacity of glioma cells. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying this particular characteristic. While the Rho-kinase (...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mertsch, Sonja, Thanos, Solon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer US 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-013-8568-6
_version_ 1782307019637653504
author Mertsch, Sonja
Thanos, Solon
author_facet Mertsch, Sonja
Thanos, Solon
author_sort Mertsch, Sonja
collection PubMed
description Despite current advances in therapy, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma has not improved sufficiently in recent decades. This is due mainly to the highly invasive capacity of glioma cells. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying this particular characteristic. While the Rho-kinase (ROCK)-dependent signaling pathways involved in glioma migration have yet to be determined, they show promise as one of the candidates in targeted glioblastoma therapy. There are two ROCK isoforms: ROCK1, which is upregulated in glioblastoma tissue compared to normal brain tissue, and ROCK2, which is also expressed in normal brain tissue. Blockage of both of these ROCK isoforms with pharmacologic inhibitors regulates the migration process. We examined the activities of ROCK1 and ROCK2 using knockdown cell lines and the newly developed stripe assay. Selective knockdown of either ROCK1 or ROCK2 exerted antidromic effects on glioma migration: while ROCK1 deletion altered the substrate-dependent migration, deletion of ROCK2 did not. Furthermore, ROCK1 knockdown reduced cell proliferation, whereas ROCK2 knockdown enhanced it. Along the signaling pathways, key regulators of the ROCK pathway are differentially affected by ROCK1 and ROCK2. These data suggest that the balanced activation of ROCKs is responsible for the substrate-specific migration and the proliferation of glioblastoma cells.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3950623
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Springer US
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39506232014-03-20 Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells Mertsch, Sonja Thanos, Solon Mol Neurobiol Article Despite current advances in therapy, the prognosis of patients with glioblastoma has not improved sufficiently in recent decades. This is due mainly to the highly invasive capacity of glioma cells. Little is known about the mechanisms underlying this particular characteristic. While the Rho-kinase (ROCK)-dependent signaling pathways involved in glioma migration have yet to be determined, they show promise as one of the candidates in targeted glioblastoma therapy. There are two ROCK isoforms: ROCK1, which is upregulated in glioblastoma tissue compared to normal brain tissue, and ROCK2, which is also expressed in normal brain tissue. Blockage of both of these ROCK isoforms with pharmacologic inhibitors regulates the migration process. We examined the activities of ROCK1 and ROCK2 using knockdown cell lines and the newly developed stripe assay. Selective knockdown of either ROCK1 or ROCK2 exerted antidromic effects on glioma migration: while ROCK1 deletion altered the substrate-dependent migration, deletion of ROCK2 did not. Furthermore, ROCK1 knockdown reduced cell proliferation, whereas ROCK2 knockdown enhanced it. Along the signaling pathways, key regulators of the ROCK pathway are differentially affected by ROCK1 and ROCK2. These data suggest that the balanced activation of ROCKs is responsible for the substrate-specific migration and the proliferation of glioblastoma cells. Springer US 2013-10-30 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3950623/ /pubmed/24170433 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-013-8568-6 Text en © The Author(s) 2013 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License which permits any use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and the source are credited.
spellingShingle Article
Mertsch, Sonja
Thanos, Solon
Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells
title Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells
title_full Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells
title_fullStr Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells
title_full_unstemmed Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells
title_short Opposing Signaling of ROCK1 and ROCK2 Determines the Switching of Substrate Specificity and the Mode of Migration of Glioblastoma Cells
title_sort opposing signaling of rock1 and rock2 determines the switching of substrate specificity and the mode of migration of glioblastoma cells
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950623/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24170433
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12035-013-8568-6
work_keys_str_mv AT mertschsonja opposingsignalingofrock1androck2determinestheswitchingofsubstratespecificityandthemodeofmigrationofglioblastomacells
AT thanossolon opposingsignalingofrock1androck2determinestheswitchingofsubstratespecificityandthemodeofmigrationofglioblastomacells