Cargando…

Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry

BACKGROUND: Oestrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative (ER−PR−) breast cancer is associated with poorer prognosis compared with other breast cancer subtypes. High parity has been associated with an increased risk of ER−PR− cancer, but emerging evidence suggests that breastfeedi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Work, M E, John, E M, Andrulis, I L, Knight, J A, Liao, Y, Mulligan, A M, Southey, M C, Giles, G G, Dite, G S, Apicella, C, Hibshoosh, H, Hopper, J L, Terry, M B
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24548865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.807
_version_ 1782307061487370240
author Work, M E
John, E M
Andrulis, I L
Knight, J A
Liao, Y
Mulligan, A M
Southey, M C
Giles, G G
Dite, G S
Apicella, C
Hibshoosh, H
Hopper, J L
Terry, M B
author_facet Work, M E
John, E M
Andrulis, I L
Knight, J A
Liao, Y
Mulligan, A M
Southey, M C
Giles, G G
Dite, G S
Apicella, C
Hibshoosh, H
Hopper, J L
Terry, M B
author_sort Work, M E
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Oestrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative (ER−PR−) breast cancer is associated with poorer prognosis compared with other breast cancer subtypes. High parity has been associated with an increased risk of ER−PR− cancer, but emerging evidence suggests that breastfeeding may reduce this risk. Whether this potential breastfeeding benefit extends to women at high risk of breast cancer remains critical to understand for prevention. METHODS: Using population-based ascertained cases (n=4011) and controls (2997) from the Breast Cancer Family Registry, we examined reproductive risk factors in relation to ER and PR status. RESULTS: High parity (⩾3 live births) without breastfeeding was positively associated only with ER−PR− tumours (odds ratio (OR)=1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10–2.24); there was no association with parity in women who breastfed (OR=0.93, 95% CI 0.71–1.22). Across all race/ethnicities, associations for ER−PR− cancer were higher among women who did not breastfeed than among women who did. Oral contraceptive (OC) use before 1975 was associated with an increased risk of ER−PR− cancer only (OR=1.32, 95% CI 1.04–1.67). For women who began OC use in 1975 or later there was no increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that there are modifiable factors for ER−PR− breast cancer and that breastfeeding in particular may mitigate the increased risk of ER−PR− cancers seen from multiparity.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3950851
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39508512015-03-04 Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry Work, M E John, E M Andrulis, I L Knight, J A Liao, Y Mulligan, A M Southey, M C Giles, G G Dite, G S Apicella, C Hibshoosh, H Hopper, J L Terry, M B Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Oestrogen receptor (ER)- and progesterone receptor (PR)-negative (ER−PR−) breast cancer is associated with poorer prognosis compared with other breast cancer subtypes. High parity has been associated with an increased risk of ER−PR− cancer, but emerging evidence suggests that breastfeeding may reduce this risk. Whether this potential breastfeeding benefit extends to women at high risk of breast cancer remains critical to understand for prevention. METHODS: Using population-based ascertained cases (n=4011) and controls (2997) from the Breast Cancer Family Registry, we examined reproductive risk factors in relation to ER and PR status. RESULTS: High parity (⩾3 live births) without breastfeeding was positively associated only with ER−PR− tumours (odds ratio (OR)=1.57, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.10–2.24); there was no association with parity in women who breastfed (OR=0.93, 95% CI 0.71–1.22). Across all race/ethnicities, associations for ER−PR− cancer were higher among women who did not breastfeed than among women who did. Oral contraceptive (OC) use before 1975 was associated with an increased risk of ER−PR− cancer only (OR=1.32, 95% CI 1.04–1.67). For women who began OC use in 1975 or later there was no increased risk. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings support that there are modifiable factors for ER−PR− breast cancer and that breastfeeding in particular may mitigate the increased risk of ER−PR− cancers seen from multiparity. Nature Publishing Group 2014-03-04 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3950851/ /pubmed/24548865 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.807 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Work, M E
John, E M
Andrulis, I L
Knight, J A
Liao, Y
Mulligan, A M
Southey, M C
Giles, G G
Dite, G S
Apicella, C
Hibshoosh, H
Hopper, J L
Terry, M B
Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_full Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_fullStr Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_full_unstemmed Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_short Reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the Breast Cancer Family Registry
title_sort reproductive risk factors and oestrogen/progesterone receptor-negative breast cancer in the breast cancer family registry
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950851/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24548865
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2013.807
work_keys_str_mv AT workme reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT johnem reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT andrulisil reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT knightja reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT liaoy reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT mulliganam reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT southeymc reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT gilesgg reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT ditegs reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT apicellac reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT hibshooshh reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT hopperjl reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry
AT terrymb reproductiveriskfactorsandoestrogenprogesteronereceptornegativebreastcancerinthebreastcancerfamilyregistry