Cargando…

Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology

BACKGROUND: Studies of fat intake and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk have reported inconsistent findings, hence we hypothesised that associations may vary by histologic subtype. METHODS: We evaluated fat intake in a New England case–control study including 1872 cases and 1978 population-based...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Merritt, M A, Cramer, D W, Missmer, S A, Vitonis, A F, Titus, L J, Terry, K L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Nature Publishing Group 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24473401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.16
_version_ 1782307064922505216
author Merritt, M A
Cramer, D W
Missmer, S A
Vitonis, A F
Titus, L J
Terry, K L
author_facet Merritt, M A
Cramer, D W
Missmer, S A
Vitonis, A F
Titus, L J
Terry, K L
author_sort Merritt, M A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Studies of fat intake and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk have reported inconsistent findings, hence we hypothesised that associations may vary by histologic subtype. METHODS: We evaluated fat intake in a New England case–control study including 1872 cases and 1978 population-based controls (1992–2008). Epithelial ovarian cancer risk factors and diet were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire at enrolment. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between fat intake and EOC risk and polytomous logistic regression was used to test whether associations varied by histologic subtype. RESULTS: We observed a decreased risk of EOC when comparing the highest vs lowest quartiles of intake of omega-3 (odds ratio (OR)=0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.96, P-trend=0.01) and omega-6 (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.94, P-trend=0.02) and an increased risk with high consumption of trans fat (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.08–1.57, P-trend=0.002). There was no significant heterogeneity by tumour histologic subtype; however, we observed a strong decreased risk for endometrioid invasive tumours with high intake of omega-3 (quartile (Q) 4 vs Q1, OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.41–0.82, P-trend=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that higher intake of omega-3 may be protective for EOC overall and endometrioid tumours in particular, whereas greater consumption of trans fat may increase risk of EOC overall.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3950866
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Nature Publishing Group
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39508662015-03-04 Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology Merritt, M A Cramer, D W Missmer, S A Vitonis, A F Titus, L J Terry, K L Br J Cancer Epidemiology BACKGROUND: Studies of fat intake and epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC) risk have reported inconsistent findings, hence we hypothesised that associations may vary by histologic subtype. METHODS: We evaluated fat intake in a New England case–control study including 1872 cases and 1978 population-based controls (1992–2008). Epithelial ovarian cancer risk factors and diet were assessed using a food frequency questionnaire at enrolment. Logistic regression was used to estimate associations between fat intake and EOC risk and polytomous logistic regression was used to test whether associations varied by histologic subtype. RESULTS: We observed a decreased risk of EOC when comparing the highest vs lowest quartiles of intake of omega-3 (odds ratio (OR)=0.79, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.66–0.96, P-trend=0.01) and omega-6 (OR=0.77, 95% CI 0.64–0.94, P-trend=0.02) and an increased risk with high consumption of trans fat (OR=1.30, 95% CI 1.08–1.57, P-trend=0.002). There was no significant heterogeneity by tumour histologic subtype; however, we observed a strong decreased risk for endometrioid invasive tumours with high intake of omega-3 (quartile (Q) 4 vs Q1, OR=0.58, 95% CI 0.41–0.82, P-trend=0.003). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that higher intake of omega-3 may be protective for EOC overall and endometrioid tumours in particular, whereas greater consumption of trans fat may increase risk of EOC overall. Nature Publishing Group 2014-03-04 2014-01-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3950866/ /pubmed/24473401 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.16 Text en Copyright © 2014 Cancer Research UK http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/ From twelve months after its original publication, this work is licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported License. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/
spellingShingle Epidemiology
Merritt, M A
Cramer, D W
Missmer, S A
Vitonis, A F
Titus, L J
Terry, K L
Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
title Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
title_full Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
title_fullStr Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
title_full_unstemmed Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
title_short Dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
title_sort dietary fat intake and risk of epithelial ovarian cancer by tumour histology
topic Epidemiology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950866/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24473401
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/bjc.2014.16
work_keys_str_mv AT merrittma dietaryfatintakeandriskofepithelialovariancancerbytumourhistology
AT cramerdw dietaryfatintakeandriskofepithelialovariancancerbytumourhistology
AT missmersa dietaryfatintakeandriskofepithelialovariancancerbytumourhistology
AT vitonisaf dietaryfatintakeandriskofepithelialovariancancerbytumourhistology
AT tituslj dietaryfatintakeandriskofepithelialovariancancerbytumourhistology
AT terrykl dietaryfatintakeandriskofepithelialovariancancerbytumourhistology