Cargando…

Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens

Silver-based wound dressings have been developed for the control of bioburden in wounds. However, the popularity and extensive use of silver-based dressings has been associated with emerging microbial resistances to silver. In this study we examined in vitro antibacterial efficacy of a bioelectric d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kim, Hosan, Makin, Inder, Skiba, Jeff, Ho, Amy, Housler, Greggory, Stojadinovic, Alexander, Izadjoo, Mina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Bentham Open 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627730
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801408010015
_version_ 1782307078194331648
author Kim, Hosan
Makin, Inder
Skiba, Jeff
Ho, Amy
Housler, Greggory
Stojadinovic, Alexander
Izadjoo, Mina
author_facet Kim, Hosan
Makin, Inder
Skiba, Jeff
Ho, Amy
Housler, Greggory
Stojadinovic, Alexander
Izadjoo, Mina
author_sort Kim, Hosan
collection PubMed
description Silver-based wound dressings have been developed for the control of bioburden in wounds. However, the popularity and extensive use of silver-based dressings has been associated with emerging microbial resistances to silver. In this study we examined in vitro antibacterial efficacy of a bioelectric dressing containing silver and zinc against various wound pathogens. Antibiotic-sensitive clinical wound isolates showed a 100% reduction in bacterial growth, except that Enterococcus faecalis isolate was shown to survive with a bacterial log(10) reduction rate of less than 10(2) CFU. We also investigated antibacterial efficacy against the extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) bacteria, multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The bioelectric dressing was effective in killing wound pathogens including ESBL, MDR, and MRSA in vitro. Furthermore, based on the primary results against E. faecalis, we carried out extensive studies against several nosocomial Enterococcus species including vancomycin-resistant species. Overall, the vancomycin-sensitive or -resistant Enterococcus species were resistant to this dressing at up to 48 h, except for the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus raffinosus isolate only showing a 100% bacterial reduction at 48 h, but not at 24 h. The results demonstrated the effective bactericidal activity of a bioelectric dressing against antibiotic-sensitive and MDR strains, but Enterococcus species are bacteriostatic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3950956
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Bentham Open
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39509562014-03-13 Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens Kim, Hosan Makin, Inder Skiba, Jeff Ho, Amy Housler, Greggory Stojadinovic, Alexander Izadjoo, Mina Open Microbiol J Article Silver-based wound dressings have been developed for the control of bioburden in wounds. However, the popularity and extensive use of silver-based dressings has been associated with emerging microbial resistances to silver. In this study we examined in vitro antibacterial efficacy of a bioelectric dressing containing silver and zinc against various wound pathogens. Antibiotic-sensitive clinical wound isolates showed a 100% reduction in bacterial growth, except that Enterococcus faecalis isolate was shown to survive with a bacterial log(10) reduction rate of less than 10(2) CFU. We also investigated antibacterial efficacy against the extended spectrum β-lactamase (ESBL) bacteria, multidrug-resistant (MDR) bacteria, and methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA). The bioelectric dressing was effective in killing wound pathogens including ESBL, MDR, and MRSA in vitro. Furthermore, based on the primary results against E. faecalis, we carried out extensive studies against several nosocomial Enterococcus species including vancomycin-resistant species. Overall, the vancomycin-sensitive or -resistant Enterococcus species were resistant to this dressing at up to 48 h, except for the vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus raffinosus isolate only showing a 100% bacterial reduction at 48 h, but not at 24 h. The results demonstrated the effective bactericidal activity of a bioelectric dressing against antibiotic-sensitive and MDR strains, but Enterococcus species are bacteriostatic. Bentham Open 2014-02-21 /pmc/articles/PMC3950956/ /pubmed/24627730 http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801408010015 Text en © Kim et al.; Licensee Bentham Open. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open access article licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted, non-commercial use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Article
Kim, Hosan
Makin, Inder
Skiba, Jeff
Ho, Amy
Housler, Greggory
Stojadinovic, Alexander
Izadjoo, Mina
Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens
title Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens
title_full Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens
title_fullStr Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens
title_full_unstemmed Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens
title_short Antibacterial Efficacy Testing of a Bioelectric Wound Dressing Against Clinical Wound Pathogens
title_sort antibacterial efficacy testing of a bioelectric wound dressing against clinical wound pathogens
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3950956/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24627730
http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1874285801408010015
work_keys_str_mv AT kimhosan antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens
AT makininder antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens
AT skibajeff antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens
AT hoamy antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens
AT houslergreggory antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens
AT stojadinovicalexander antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens
AT izadjoomina antibacterialefficacytestingofabioelectricwounddressingagainstclinicalwoundpathogens