Cargando…

Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood

Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction compared with conventional X-ray radiotherapy for medulloblastoma in childhood. Methods: We developed a Markov model to describe health states of 6-year-old children with medul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirano, Emi, Fuji, Hiroshi, Onoe, Tsuyoshi, Kumar, Vinay, Shirato, Hiroki, Kawabuchi, Koichi
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24187330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt112
_version_ 1782307086337572864
author Hirano, Emi
Fuji, Hiroshi
Onoe, Tsuyoshi
Kumar, Vinay
Shirato, Hiroki
Kawabuchi, Koichi
author_facet Hirano, Emi
Fuji, Hiroshi
Onoe, Tsuyoshi
Kumar, Vinay
Shirato, Hiroki
Kawabuchi, Koichi
author_sort Hirano, Emi
collection PubMed
description Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction compared with conventional X-ray radiotherapy for medulloblastoma in childhood. Methods: We developed a Markov model to describe health states of 6-year-old children with medulloblastoma after treatment with proton or X-ray radiotherapy. The risks of hearing loss were calculated on cochlear dose for each treatment. Three types of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D were used for estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for proton beam therapy compared with X-ray radiotherapy was calculated for each HRQOL. Sensitivity analyses were performed to model uncertainty in these parameters. Results: The ICER for EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D were $21 716/QALY, $11 773/QALY, and $20 150/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses found that the results were sensitive to discount rate, the risk of hearing loss after proton therapy, and costs of proton irradiation. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analysis revealed a 99% probability of proton therapy being cost effective at a societal willingness-to-pay value. Conclusions: Proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction improves health outcomes at a cost that is within the acceptable cost-effectiveness range from the payer's standpoint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3951074
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39510742014-03-12 Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood Hirano, Emi Fuji, Hiroshi Onoe, Tsuyoshi Kumar, Vinay Shirato, Hiroki Kawabuchi, Koichi J Radiat Res Oncology Background: The aim of this study is to evaluate the cost-effectiveness of proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction compared with conventional X-ray radiotherapy for medulloblastoma in childhood. Methods: We developed a Markov model to describe health states of 6-year-old children with medulloblastoma after treatment with proton or X-ray radiotherapy. The risks of hearing loss were calculated on cochlear dose for each treatment. Three types of health-related quality of life (HRQOL) of EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D were used for estimation of quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). The incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) for proton beam therapy compared with X-ray radiotherapy was calculated for each HRQOL. Sensitivity analyses were performed to model uncertainty in these parameters. Results: The ICER for EQ-5D, HUI3 and SF-6D were $21 716/QALY, $11 773/QALY, and $20 150/QALY, respectively. One-way sensitivity analyses found that the results were sensitive to discount rate, the risk of hearing loss after proton therapy, and costs of proton irradiation. Cost-effectiveness acceptability curve analysis revealed a 99% probability of proton therapy being cost effective at a societal willingness-to-pay value. Conclusions: Proton beam therapy with cochlear dose reduction improves health outcomes at a cost that is within the acceptable cost-effectiveness range from the payer's standpoint. Oxford University Press 2014-03 2013-11-01 /pmc/articles/PMC3951074/ /pubmed/24187330 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt112 Text en © The Author 2013. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of The Japan Radiation Research Society and Japanese Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Oncology
Hirano, Emi
Fuji, Hiroshi
Onoe, Tsuyoshi
Kumar, Vinay
Shirato, Hiroki
Kawabuchi, Koichi
Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
title Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
title_full Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
title_fullStr Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
title_full_unstemmed Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
title_short Cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
title_sort cost-effectiveness analysis of cochlear dose reduction by proton beam therapy for medulloblastoma in childhood
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3951074/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24187330
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jrr/rrt112
work_keys_str_mv AT hiranoemi costeffectivenessanalysisofcochleardosereductionbyprotonbeamtherapyformedulloblastomainchildhood
AT fujihiroshi costeffectivenessanalysisofcochleardosereductionbyprotonbeamtherapyformedulloblastomainchildhood
AT onoetsuyoshi costeffectivenessanalysisofcochleardosereductionbyprotonbeamtherapyformedulloblastomainchildhood
AT kumarvinay costeffectivenessanalysisofcochleardosereductionbyprotonbeamtherapyformedulloblastomainchildhood
AT shiratohiroki costeffectivenessanalysisofcochleardosereductionbyprotonbeamtherapyformedulloblastomainchildhood
AT kawabuchikoichi costeffectivenessanalysisofcochleardosereductionbyprotonbeamtherapyformedulloblastomainchildhood