Cargando…

The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis

Introduction: Severe sepsis is a leading cause of non-coronary death in hospitals across the United States. Early identification and risk stratification in the emergency department (ED) is difficult because there is limited ability to predict escalation of care. In this study we evaluated if a susta...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Wira, Charles R., Francis, Melissa W., Bhat, Sundeep, Ehrman, Robert, Conner, David, Siegel, Mark
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696751
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18472
_version_ 1782307277807550464
author Wira, Charles R.
Francis, Melissa W.
Bhat, Sundeep
Ehrman, Robert
Conner, David
Siegel, Mark
author_facet Wira, Charles R.
Francis, Melissa W.
Bhat, Sundeep
Ehrman, Robert
Conner, David
Siegel, Mark
author_sort Wira, Charles R.
collection PubMed
description Introduction: Severe sepsis is a leading cause of non-coronary death in hospitals across the United States. Early identification and risk stratification in the emergency department (ED) is difficult because there is limited ability to predict escalation of care. In this study we evaluated if a sustained shock index (SI) elevation in the ED was a predictor of short-term cardiovascular collapse, defined as vasopressor dependence within 72 hours of initial presentation. Methods: Retrospective dual-centered cross-sectional study using patients identified in the Yale-New Haven Hospital Emergency Medicine sepsis registry. Results: We included 295 patients in the study with 47.5% (n=140) having a sustained SI elevation in the ED. Among patients with a sustained SI elevation, 38.6% (54 of 140) required vasopressors within 72 hours of ED admission contrasted to 11.6% (18 of 155) without a sustained SI elevation (p=0.0001; multivariate modeling OR 4.42 with 95% confidence intervals 2.28–8.55) . In the SI elevation group the mean number of organ failures was 4.0 ± 2.1 contrasted to 3.2 ± 1.6 in the non-SI elevation group (p=0.0001). Conclusion: ED patients with severe sepsis and a sustained SI elevation appear to have higher rates of short-term vasopressor use, and a greater number of organ failures contrasted to patients without a sustained SI elevation. An elevated SI may be a useful modality to identify patients with severe sepsis at risk for disease escalation and cardiovascular collapse.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3952891
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39528912014-04-02 The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis Wira, Charles R. Francis, Melissa W. Bhat, Sundeep Ehrman, Robert Conner, David Siegel, Mark West J Emerg Med TREATMENT PROTOCOL ASSESSMENT Introduction: Severe sepsis is a leading cause of non-coronary death in hospitals across the United States. Early identification and risk stratification in the emergency department (ED) is difficult because there is limited ability to predict escalation of care. In this study we evaluated if a sustained shock index (SI) elevation in the ED was a predictor of short-term cardiovascular collapse, defined as vasopressor dependence within 72 hours of initial presentation. Methods: Retrospective dual-centered cross-sectional study using patients identified in the Yale-New Haven Hospital Emergency Medicine sepsis registry. Results: We included 295 patients in the study with 47.5% (n=140) having a sustained SI elevation in the ED. Among patients with a sustained SI elevation, 38.6% (54 of 140) required vasopressors within 72 hours of ED admission contrasted to 11.6% (18 of 155) without a sustained SI elevation (p=0.0001; multivariate modeling OR 4.42 with 95% confidence intervals 2.28–8.55) . In the SI elevation group the mean number of organ failures was 4.0 ± 2.1 contrasted to 3.2 ± 1.6 in the non-SI elevation group (p=0.0001). Conclusion: ED patients with severe sepsis and a sustained SI elevation appear to have higher rates of short-term vasopressor use, and a greater number of organ failures contrasted to patients without a sustained SI elevation. An elevated SI may be a useful modality to identify patients with severe sepsis at risk for disease escalation and cardiovascular collapse. Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine 2014-02 /pmc/articles/PMC3952891/ /pubmed/24696751 http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18472 Text en © 2014 Department of Emergency Medicine, University of California, Irvine http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0 This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) License. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.
spellingShingle TREATMENT PROTOCOL ASSESSMENT
Wira, Charles R.
Francis, Melissa W.
Bhat, Sundeep
Ehrman, Robert
Conner, David
Siegel, Mark
The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis
title The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis
title_full The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis
title_fullStr The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis
title_full_unstemmed The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis
title_short The Shock Index as a Predictor of Vasopressor Use in Emergency Department Patients with Severe Sepsis
title_sort shock index as a predictor of vasopressor use in emergency department patients with severe sepsis
topic TREATMENT PROTOCOL ASSESSMENT
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3952891/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24696751
http://dx.doi.org/10.5811/westjem.2013.7.18472
work_keys_str_mv AT wiracharlesr theshockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT francismelissaw theshockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT bhatsundeep theshockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT ehrmanrobert theshockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT connerdavid theshockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT siegelmark theshockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT wiracharlesr shockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT francismelissaw shockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT bhatsundeep shockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT ehrmanrobert shockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT connerdavid shockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis
AT siegelmark shockindexasapredictorofvasopressoruseinemergencydepartmentpatientswithseveresepsis