Cargando…

Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of and the prognosis for colorectal cancers (CRCs) with microsatellite instabilities (MSIs). METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, genotyping was performed on 245 patients with stage II/III CRCs to establish the MSI status. T...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shin, Ui Sup, Cho, Sang Sik, Moon, Sun Mi, Park, Sun Hoo, Jee, Sun Hee, Jung, Eun-Joo, Hwang, Dae-Yong
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3953166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.28
_version_ 1782307313031315456
author Shin, Ui Sup
Cho, Sang Sik
Moon, Sun Mi
Park, Sun Hoo
Jee, Sun Hee
Jung, Eun-Joo
Hwang, Dae-Yong
author_facet Shin, Ui Sup
Cho, Sang Sik
Moon, Sun Mi
Park, Sun Hoo
Jee, Sun Hee
Jung, Eun-Joo
Hwang, Dae-Yong
author_sort Shin, Ui Sup
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of and the prognosis for colorectal cancers (CRCs) with microsatellite instabilities (MSIs). METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, genotyping was performed on 245 patients with stage II/III CRCs to establish the MSI status. The clinicopathologic differences and the prognostic value of MSI were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 7-68 months). RESULTS: Of the total 245 patients, 20 (8.2%) had MSI-high (H) and 225 (91.8%) had MSI-low (L) or stable (S) CRCs. Adjuvant chemotherapies were performed on 101 stage II (87.8%) and 107 stage III patients (82.3%). Patients with MSI-H CRCs more frequently had a family history of colon cancer (10% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.003), more frequently had a cancer located at the proximal colon (90.0% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001), and more often showed a mucinous phenotype or poor differentiation (35.0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.001). Despite less frequent lymph node metastasis (25% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.01), the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (26.3 ± 13.1 vs. 20.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.04) in the MSI-H group. The overall survival and the disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ with respect to MSI status. However, in the stage II subgroup, the DFS for patients with MSI-H CRCs was significantly worse (72.2% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.03). The multivariate analysis performed on this subgroup revealed that MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.6, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: MSI-H CRCs had distinct clinicopathologic features, and MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor in stage II CRCs. Considering the majority of stage II patients were administrated adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for treating MSI CRCs might be different from that for treating MSI-L/S tumors.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3953166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Coloproctology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39531662014-03-17 Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer? Shin, Ui Sup Cho, Sang Sik Moon, Sun Mi Park, Sun Hoo Jee, Sun Hee Jung, Eun-Joo Hwang, Dae-Yong Ann Coloproctol Original Article PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to investigate the clinicopathologic features of and the prognosis for colorectal cancers (CRCs) with microsatellite instabilities (MSIs). METHODS: Between 2006 and 2009, genotyping was performed on 245 patients with stage II/III CRCs to establish the MSI status. The clinicopathologic differences and the prognostic value of MSI were analyzed. The median follow-up period was 38 months (range, 7-68 months). RESULTS: Of the total 245 patients, 20 (8.2%) had MSI-high (H) and 225 (91.8%) had MSI-low (L) or stable (S) CRCs. Adjuvant chemotherapies were performed on 101 stage II (87.8%) and 107 stage III patients (82.3%). Patients with MSI-H CRCs more frequently had a family history of colon cancer (10% vs. 2.7%, P = 0.003), more frequently had a cancer located at the proximal colon (90.0% vs. 19.1%, P < 0.0001), and more often showed a mucinous phenotype or poor differentiation (35.0% vs. 7.1%, P = 0.001). Despite less frequent lymph node metastasis (25% vs. 55.6%, P = 0.01), the number of retrieved lymph nodes was higher (26.3 ± 13.1 vs. 20.7 ± 1.2, P = 0.04) in the MSI-H group. The overall survival and the disease-free survival (DFS) did not differ with respect to MSI status. However, in the stage II subgroup, the DFS for patients with MSI-H CRCs was significantly worse (72.2% vs. 90.7%, P = 0.03). The multivariate analysis performed on this subgroup revealed that MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor (adjusted hazard ratio, 4.0; 95% confidence interval, 1.0-15.6, P = 0.046). CONCLUSION: MSI-H CRCs had distinct clinicopathologic features, and MSI-H was an independent poor prognostic factor in stage II CRCs. Considering the majority of stage II patients were administrated adjuvant chemotherapy, the efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy for treating MSI CRCs might be different from that for treating MSI-L/S tumors. The Korean Society of Coloproctology 2014-02 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3953166/ /pubmed/24639968 http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.28 Text en © 2014 The Korean Society of Coloproctology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shin, Ui Sup
Cho, Sang Sik
Moon, Sun Mi
Park, Sun Hoo
Jee, Sun Hee
Jung, Eun-Joo
Hwang, Dae-Yong
Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
title Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
title_full Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
title_fullStr Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
title_full_unstemmed Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
title_short Is Microsatellite Instability Really a Good Prognostic Factor of Colorectal Cancer?
title_sort is microsatellite instability really a good prognostic factor of colorectal cancer?
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3953166/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639968
http://dx.doi.org/10.3393/ac.2014.30.1.28
work_keys_str_mv AT shinuisup ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer
AT chosangsik ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer
AT moonsunmi ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer
AT parksunhoo ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer
AT jeesunhee ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer
AT jungeunjoo ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer
AT hwangdaeyong ismicrosatelliteinstabilityreallyagoodprognosticfactorofcolorectalcancer