Cargando…
Use of macular thickness parameters for the diagnosis of primary open-angle glaucoma
INTRODUCTION: Retinal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma patients was determined to establish its correlation with advancement of glaucoma neuropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-four patients (371 eyes, age 30–65 years) were divided in 3 groups including 50 patients with confirme...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Termedia Publishing House
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3953980/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24701222 http://dx.doi.org/10.5114/aoms.2014.40736 |
Sumario: | INTRODUCTION: Retinal thickness in primary open-angle glaucoma patients was determined to establish its correlation with advancement of glaucoma neuropathy. MATERIAL AND METHODS: One hundred ninety-four patients (371 eyes, age 30–65 years) were divided in 3 groups including 50 patients with confirmed primary open-angle glaucoma, 67 primary open-angle glaucoma-suspected patients and 77 healthy persons (control group). The retinal foveola, foveal, peri-foveal and posterior pole average thickness values were determined with an RTA analyzer. For comparison, linear cup-to-disc diameter ratio (C/D), nerve fiber index (NFI) and mean defect of the retina sensitivity (MD) were also determined. RESULTS: Statistically highly significant differences in the retinal thickness and glaucoma parameters between the individual groups were observed. In the peri-foveal region, the retinal thickness in glaucoma patients was only 173.0 ±11.4 µm while in the healthy patients 201.1 ±13.1 µm. In the posterior pole region, the thickness values were only 168.1 ±11.3 µm and 195.7 ±12.3 µm, respectively. A moderate correlation between retinal thickness in peri-foveal and posterior pole regions and the C/D, NFI and MD parameters was also established (Pearson coefficients below –0.351 or above 0.284). CONCLUSIONS: The retinal thickness in the peri-foveal and posterior pole regions depends on the degree of glaucoma advancement. This original observation may be a basis for acceptance of this method as a quite new tool in glaucoma diagnosis. |
---|