Cargando…

The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee

INTRODUCTION: Chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee are notoriously difficult to treat due to the poor healing capacity of articular cartilage and the hostile environment of moving joints, ultimately causing disabling pain and early osteoarthritis. There are many different reconstructive te...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Perera, JR, Gikas, PD, Bentley, G
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221592573
_version_ 1782307456472317952
author Perera, JR
Gikas, PD
Bentley, G
author_facet Perera, JR
Gikas, PD
Bentley, G
author_sort Perera, JR
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee are notoriously difficult to treat due to the poor healing capacity of articular cartilage and the hostile environment of moving joints, ultimately causing disabling pain and early osteoarthritis. There are many different reconstructive techniques used currently but few are proven to be of value. However, some have been shown to produce a better repair with hyaline-like cartilage rather than fibrocartilage. METHODS: A systematic search of all available online databases including PubMed, MEDLINE® and Embase™ was undertaken using several keywords. All the multiple treatment options and methods available were considered. These were summarised and the evidence for and against them was scrutinised. RESULTS: A total of 460 articles were identified after cross-referencing the database searches using the keywords. These revealed that autologous and matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation demonstrated both ‘good to excellent’ histological results and significant improvement in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous and matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation have been shown to treat symptomatic lesions successfully with significant histological and clinical improvement. There is, however, still a need for further randomised clinical trials, perfecting the type of scaffold and the use of adjuncts such as growth factors. A list of recommendations for treatment and the potential future trends of managing these lesions are given.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3954317
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Royal College of Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39543172014-03-19 The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee Perera, JR Gikas, PD Bentley, G Ann R Coll Surg Engl Review INTRODUCTION: Chondral and osteochondral lesions of the knee are notoriously difficult to treat due to the poor healing capacity of articular cartilage and the hostile environment of moving joints, ultimately causing disabling pain and early osteoarthritis. There are many different reconstructive techniques used currently but few are proven to be of value. However, some have been shown to produce a better repair with hyaline-like cartilage rather than fibrocartilage. METHODS: A systematic search of all available online databases including PubMed, MEDLINE® and Embase™ was undertaken using several keywords. All the multiple treatment options and methods available were considered. These were summarised and the evidence for and against them was scrutinised. RESULTS: A total of 460 articles were identified after cross-referencing the database searches using the keywords. These revealed that autologous and matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation demonstrated both ‘good to excellent’ histological results and significant improvement in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Autologous and matrix assisted chondrocyte implantation have been shown to treat symptomatic lesions successfully with significant histological and clinical improvement. There is, however, still a need for further randomised clinical trials, perfecting the type of scaffold and the use of adjuncts such as growth factors. A list of recommendations for treatment and the potential future trends of managing these lesions are given. Royal College of Surgeons 2012-09 /pmc/articles/PMC3954317/ /pubmed/22943326 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221592573 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review
Perera, JR
Gikas, PD
Bentley, G
The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
title The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
title_full The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
title_fullStr The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
title_full_unstemmed The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
title_short The present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
title_sort present state of treatments for articular cartilage defects in the knee
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954317/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943326
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221592573
work_keys_str_mv AT pererajr thepresentstateoftreatmentsforarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee
AT gikaspd thepresentstateoftreatmentsforarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee
AT bentleyg thepresentstateoftreatmentsforarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee
AT pererajr presentstateoftreatmentsforarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee
AT gikaspd presentstateoftreatmentsforarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee
AT bentleyg presentstateoftreatmentsforarticularcartilagedefectsintheknee