Cargando…

Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting

INTRODUCTION: Urologists perform retrograde contrast studies of the ureters and pelvicalyceal systems in the operating theatre, both for diagnostic purposes and to guide instrumentation. We describe the development of a set of guidelines that aim to standardise the diagnostic quality of these studie...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Harris, MA, Marsh, T, Llewellyn, A, West, A, Naisby, G, Gowda, BDR
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Royal College of Surgeons 2012
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221500385
_version_ 1782307469566935040
author Harris, MA
Marsh, T
Llewellyn, A
West, A
Naisby, G
Gowda, BDR
author_facet Harris, MA
Marsh, T
Llewellyn, A
West, A
Naisby, G
Gowda, BDR
author_sort Harris, MA
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: Urologists perform retrograde contrast studies of the ureters and pelvicalyceal systems in the operating theatre, both for diagnostic purposes and to guide instrumentation. We describe the development of a set of guidelines that aim to standardise the diagnostic quality of these studies and to reduce radiation dose to the patient and theatre staff. The guidelines incorporate a reporting template that allows a urologist’s written report to be made available on the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for subsequent multidisciplinary review. METHODS: Three cycles of audit were conducted to assess the implementation of the guidelines. An independent reviewer rated image quality and screening times. During the audit cycle, the presentation of the guidelines was honed. The end product is a flowchart and reporting template for use by urologists in the operating theatre. RESULTS: Phase 1 of the audit included 63 studies, phase 2 included 42 studies and phase 3 included 46 studies. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the number of good quality studies and in the recording of control, contrast and post-procedure images. The mean screening time decreased from 5.0 minutes in phase 1 to 3.2 minutes in phase 3. In phase 3, when in-theatre reporting of the studies by the urologist was added, the handwritten report was scanned in and made available on PACS in 43 of 46 cases (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of guidelines improved retrograde contrast study quality and reduced screening times. A system has been developed to store appropriate pictures and a urologist’s report of the study on PACS.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3954376
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2012
publisher Royal College of Surgeons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39543762014-03-19 Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting Harris, MA Marsh, T Llewellyn, A West, A Naisby, G Gowda, BDR Ann R Coll Surg Engl Urology INTRODUCTION: Urologists perform retrograde contrast studies of the ureters and pelvicalyceal systems in the operating theatre, both for diagnostic purposes and to guide instrumentation. We describe the development of a set of guidelines that aim to standardise the diagnostic quality of these studies and to reduce radiation dose to the patient and theatre staff. The guidelines incorporate a reporting template that allows a urologist’s written report to be made available on the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for subsequent multidisciplinary review. METHODS: Three cycles of audit were conducted to assess the implementation of the guidelines. An independent reviewer rated image quality and screening times. During the audit cycle, the presentation of the guidelines was honed. The end product is a flowchart and reporting template for use by urologists in the operating theatre. RESULTS: Phase 1 of the audit included 63 studies, phase 2 included 42 studies and phase 3 included 46 studies. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the number of good quality studies and in the recording of control, contrast and post-procedure images. The mean screening time decreased from 5.0 minutes in phase 1 to 3.2 minutes in phase 3. In phase 3, when in-theatre reporting of the studies by the urologist was added, the handwritten report was scanned in and made available on PACS in 43 of 46 cases (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of guidelines improved retrograde contrast study quality and reduced screening times. A system has been developed to store appropriate pictures and a urologist’s report of the study on PACS. Royal College of Surgeons 2012-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3954376/ /pubmed/22943230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221500385 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Urology
Harris, MA
Marsh, T
Llewellyn, A
West, A
Naisby, G
Gowda, BDR
Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
title Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
title_full Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
title_fullStr Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
title_full_unstemmed Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
title_short Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
title_sort contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
topic Urology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954376/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943230
http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221500385
work_keys_str_mv AT harrisma contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting
AT marsht contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting
AT llewellyna contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting
AT westa contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting
AT naisbyg contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting
AT gowdabdr contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting