Cargando…
Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting
INTRODUCTION: Urologists perform retrograde contrast studies of the ureters and pelvicalyceal systems in the operating theatre, both for diagnostic purposes and to guide instrumentation. We describe the development of a set of guidelines that aim to standardise the diagnostic quality of these studie...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Royal College of Surgeons
2012
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221500385 |
_version_ | 1782307469566935040 |
---|---|
author | Harris, MA Marsh, T Llewellyn, A West, A Naisby, G Gowda, BDR |
author_facet | Harris, MA Marsh, T Llewellyn, A West, A Naisby, G Gowda, BDR |
author_sort | Harris, MA |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: Urologists perform retrograde contrast studies of the ureters and pelvicalyceal systems in the operating theatre, both for diagnostic purposes and to guide instrumentation. We describe the development of a set of guidelines that aim to standardise the diagnostic quality of these studies and to reduce radiation dose to the patient and theatre staff. The guidelines incorporate a reporting template that allows a urologist’s written report to be made available on the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for subsequent multidisciplinary review. METHODS: Three cycles of audit were conducted to assess the implementation of the guidelines. An independent reviewer rated image quality and screening times. During the audit cycle, the presentation of the guidelines was honed. The end product is a flowchart and reporting template for use by urologists in the operating theatre. RESULTS: Phase 1 of the audit included 63 studies, phase 2 included 42 studies and phase 3 included 46 studies. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the number of good quality studies and in the recording of control, contrast and post-procedure images. The mean screening time decreased from 5.0 minutes in phase 1 to 3.2 minutes in phase 3. In phase 3, when in-theatre reporting of the studies by the urologist was added, the handwritten report was scanned in and made available on PACS in 43 of 46 cases (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of guidelines improved retrograde contrast study quality and reduced screening times. A system has been developed to store appropriate pictures and a urologist’s report of the study on PACS. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3954376 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2012 |
publisher | Royal College of Surgeons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39543762014-03-19 Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting Harris, MA Marsh, T Llewellyn, A West, A Naisby, G Gowda, BDR Ann R Coll Surg Engl Urology INTRODUCTION: Urologists perform retrograde contrast studies of the ureters and pelvicalyceal systems in the operating theatre, both for diagnostic purposes and to guide instrumentation. We describe the development of a set of guidelines that aim to standardise the diagnostic quality of these studies and to reduce radiation dose to the patient and theatre staff. The guidelines incorporate a reporting template that allows a urologist’s written report to be made available on the picture archiving and communication system (PACS) for subsequent multidisciplinary review. METHODS: Three cycles of audit were conducted to assess the implementation of the guidelines. An independent reviewer rated image quality and screening times. During the audit cycle, the presentation of the guidelines was honed. The end product is a flowchart and reporting template for use by urologists in the operating theatre. RESULTS: Phase 1 of the audit included 63 studies, phase 2 included 42 studies and phase 3 included 46 studies. The results demonstrate significant improvements in the number of good quality studies and in the recording of control, contrast and post-procedure images. The mean screening time decreased from 5.0 minutes in phase 1 to 3.2 minutes in phase 3. In phase 3, when in-theatre reporting of the studies by the urologist was added, the handwritten report was scanned in and made available on PACS in 43 of 46 cases (93%). CONCLUSIONS: Introduction of guidelines improved retrograde contrast study quality and reduced screening times. A system has been developed to store appropriate pictures and a urologist’s report of the study on PACS. Royal College of Surgeons 2012-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3954376/ /pubmed/22943230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221500385 Text en Copyright © 2013 Royal College of Surgeons http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Urology Harris, MA Marsh, T Llewellyn, A West, A Naisby, G Gowda, BDR Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
title | Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
title_full | Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
title_fullStr | Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
title_full_unstemmed | Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
title_short | Contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
title_sort | contrast ureteropyelography in theatre: standardised flowchart reporting |
topic | Urology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954376/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22943230 http://dx.doi.org/10.1308/003588412X13171221500385 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT harrisma contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting AT marsht contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting AT llewellyna contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting AT westa contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting AT naisbyg contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting AT gowdabdr contrastureteropyelographyintheatrestandardisedflowchartreporting |