Cargando…

Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes

BACKGROUND: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. METHODS: Using >700 individual soils (0–15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km(2) area we evaluated t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Jones, David L., Simfukwe, Paul, Hill, Paul W., Mills, Robert T. E., Emmett, Bridget A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090882
_version_ 1782307488227393536
author Jones, David L.
Simfukwe, Paul
Hill, Paul W.
Mills, Robert T. E.
Emmett, Bridget A.
author_facet Jones, David L.
Simfukwe, Paul
Hill, Paul W.
Mills, Robert T. E.
Emmett, Bridget A.
author_sort Jones, David L.
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. METHODS: Using >700 individual soils (0–15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km(2) area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e.g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water. RESULTS: Overall, a good correlation (r (2) = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3954595
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39545952014-03-18 Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes Jones, David L. Simfukwe, Paul Hill, Paul W. Mills, Robert T. E. Emmett, Bridget A. PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Monitoring the properties of dissolved organic carbon (DOC) in soil water is frequently used to evaluate changes in soil quality and to explain shifts in freshwater ecosystem functioning. METHODS: Using >700 individual soils (0–15 cm) collected from a 209,331 km(2) area we evaluated the relationship between soil classification (7 major soil types) or vegetation cover (8 dominant classes, e.g. cropland, grassland, forest) and the absorbance properties (254 and 400 nm), DOC quantity and quality (SUVA, total soluble phenolics) of soil water. RESULTS: Overall, a good correlation (r (2) = 0.58) was apparent between soil water absorbance and DOC concentration across the diverse range of soil types tested. In contrast, both DOC and the absorbance properties of soil water provided a poor predictor of SUVA or soluble phenolics which we used as a measure of humic substance concentration. Significant overlap in the measured ranges for UV absorbance, DOC, phenolic content and especially SUVA of soil water were apparent between the 8 vegetation and 7 soil classes. A number of significant differences, however, were apparent within these populations with total soluble phenolics giving the greatest statistical separation between both soil and vegetation groups. CONCLUSIONS: We conclude that the quality of DOC rather than its quantity provides a more useful measure of soil quality in large scale surveys. Public Library of Science 2014-03-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3954595/ /pubmed/24633085 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090882 Text en © 2014 Jones et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Jones, David L.
Simfukwe, Paul
Hill, Paul W.
Mills, Robert T. E.
Emmett, Bridget A.
Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes
title Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes
title_full Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes
title_fullStr Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes
title_short Evaluation of Dissolved Organic Carbon as a Soil Quality Indicator in National Monitoring Schemes
title_sort evaluation of dissolved organic carbon as a soil quality indicator in national monitoring schemes
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954595/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24633085
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090882
work_keys_str_mv AT jonesdavidl evaluationofdissolvedorganiccarbonasasoilqualityindicatorinnationalmonitoringschemes
AT simfukwepaul evaluationofdissolvedorganiccarbonasasoilqualityindicatorinnationalmonitoringschemes
AT hillpaulw evaluationofdissolvedorganiccarbonasasoilqualityindicatorinnationalmonitoringschemes
AT millsrobertte evaluationofdissolvedorganiccarbonasasoilqualityindicatorinnationalmonitoringschemes
AT emmettbridgeta evaluationofdissolvedorganiccarbonasasoilqualityindicatorinnationalmonitoringschemes