Cargando…
Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics
Corneal transplantation is among the most successful solid organ transplants. However, despite low rejection rates of grafts in the ‘low-risk’ setting, rejection can be as high as 70% when grafted into ‘high-risk’ recipient beds. Under normal homeostatic conditions, the avascular cornea provides a u...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24634796 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9899.S9-006 |
_version_ | 1782307509044772864 |
---|---|
author | Qazi, Yureeda Hamrah, Pedram |
author_facet | Qazi, Yureeda Hamrah, Pedram |
author_sort | Qazi, Yureeda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Corneal transplantation is among the most successful solid organ transplants. However, despite low rejection rates of grafts in the ‘low-risk’ setting, rejection can be as high as 70% when grafted into ‘high-risk’ recipient beds. Under normal homeostatic conditions, the avascular cornea provides a unique environment that facilitates immune and angiogenic privilege. An imbalance in pro-inflammatory, angiogenic and lymphangiogenic mediators leads to a breakdown in corneal immune privilege with a consequent host response against the donor graft. Recent developments in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties have reduced the rates of graft rejection even more, while providing improved visual outcomes. The corneal layer against which an immune response is initiated, largely determines reversibility of the acute episode. While epithelial and stromal graft rejection may be treated with topical corticosteroids with higher success, acute endothelial rejection mandates a more aggressive approach to therapy due to the lack of regenerative capacity of this layer. However, current immunosuppressive regimens come with the caveat of ocular and systemic side effects, making prolonged aggressive treatment undesirable. With the advent of biologics, efficacious therapies with a superior side effect profile are on the horizon. In our review we discuss the mediators of ocular immune privilege, the roles of cellular and molecular immune players in graft rejection, with a focus on human leukocyte antigen and antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical risk factors for graft rejection and compare rates of rejection in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties to traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Lastly, we present the current and upcoming measures of therapeutic strategies to manage and treat graft rejection, including an overview of biologics and small molecule therapy. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3954811 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39548112014-03-14 Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics Qazi, Yureeda Hamrah, Pedram J Clin Cell Immunol Article Corneal transplantation is among the most successful solid organ transplants. However, despite low rejection rates of grafts in the ‘low-risk’ setting, rejection can be as high as 70% when grafted into ‘high-risk’ recipient beds. Under normal homeostatic conditions, the avascular cornea provides a unique environment that facilitates immune and angiogenic privilege. An imbalance in pro-inflammatory, angiogenic and lymphangiogenic mediators leads to a breakdown in corneal immune privilege with a consequent host response against the donor graft. Recent developments in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties have reduced the rates of graft rejection even more, while providing improved visual outcomes. The corneal layer against which an immune response is initiated, largely determines reversibility of the acute episode. While epithelial and stromal graft rejection may be treated with topical corticosteroids with higher success, acute endothelial rejection mandates a more aggressive approach to therapy due to the lack of regenerative capacity of this layer. However, current immunosuppressive regimens come with the caveat of ocular and systemic side effects, making prolonged aggressive treatment undesirable. With the advent of biologics, efficacious therapies with a superior side effect profile are on the horizon. In our review we discuss the mediators of ocular immune privilege, the roles of cellular and molecular immune players in graft rejection, with a focus on human leukocyte antigen and antigen presenting cells. Furthermore, we discuss the clinical risk factors for graft rejection and compare rates of rejection in lamellar and endothelial keratoplasties to traditional penetrating keratoplasty. Lastly, we present the current and upcoming measures of therapeutic strategies to manage and treat graft rejection, including an overview of biologics and small molecule therapy. 2013-11-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3954811/ /pubmed/24634796 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9899.S9-006 Text en Copyright: © 2013 Qazi Y, et al. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited. |
spellingShingle | Article Qazi, Yureeda Hamrah, Pedram Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics |
title | Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics |
title_full | Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics |
title_fullStr | Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics |
title_full_unstemmed | Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics |
title_short | Corneal Allograft Rejection: Immunopathogenesis to Therapeutics |
title_sort | corneal allograft rejection: immunopathogenesis to therapeutics |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3954811/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24634796 http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2155-9899.S9-006 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT qaziyureeda cornealallograftrejectionimmunopathogenesistotherapeutics AT hamrahpedram cornealallograftrejectionimmunopathogenesistotherapeutics |