Cargando…

Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis

BACKGROUND: Current methods of closure of the cleft palate result in the formation of scars and impairment of growth. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) might be an effective means to repair or at least reduce the size of wide clefts. This study investigates the biomechanical aspects of this process. MAT...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ghasemianpour, Majid, Ehsani, Sara, Tahmasbi, Soodeh, Bayat, Mohammad, Ghorbanpour, Maedeh, Safavi, Seyed Mohammadreza, Mirhashemi, Fatemeh Sadat
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688567
_version_ 1782307556456136704
author Ghasemianpour, Majid
Ehsani, Sara
Tahmasbi, Soodeh
Bayat, Mohammad
Ghorbanpour, Maedeh
Safavi, Seyed Mohammadreza
Mirhashemi, Fatemeh Sadat
author_facet Ghasemianpour, Majid
Ehsani, Sara
Tahmasbi, Soodeh
Bayat, Mohammad
Ghorbanpour, Maedeh
Safavi, Seyed Mohammadreza
Mirhashemi, Fatemeh Sadat
author_sort Ghasemianpour, Majid
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current methods of closure of the cleft palate result in the formation of scars and impairment of growth. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) might be an effective means to repair or at least reduce the size of wide clefts. This study investigates the biomechanical aspects of this process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DO simulation was applied to reduce the size of a unilateral hard palate cleft on a three-dimensional (3D) model of the maxilla. For the position of osteotomy lines, two different models were assumed, with the osteotomy line on the affected side in model A and on the intact side in model B. In each model, DO screws were placed on two different positions, anteriorly (models A1 and B1) and posteriorly (models A2 and B2). Displacement pattern of the bony island in each of the four models, reaction forces at DO locations, and von Mises stress were estimated. Mesh generation and data processing were carried out in the 3D finite element analysis package (ABAQUS V6.7-1; Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA). RESULTS: In model B2, the island moved almost evenly, assuring a more complete closure of the cleft. The most uniform stress distribution was found in model B1. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the best positions for the DO screw and the osteotomy line for closure of the cleft palate are posteriorly and on the intact side, respectively.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955322
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39553222014-03-31 Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis Ghasemianpour, Majid Ehsani, Sara Tahmasbi, Soodeh Bayat, Mohammad Ghorbanpour, Maedeh Safavi, Seyed Mohammadreza Mirhashemi, Fatemeh Sadat Dent Res J (Isfahan) Original Article BACKGROUND: Current methods of closure of the cleft palate result in the formation of scars and impairment of growth. Distraction osteogenesis (DO) might be an effective means to repair or at least reduce the size of wide clefts. This study investigates the biomechanical aspects of this process. MATERIALS AND METHODS: DO simulation was applied to reduce the size of a unilateral hard palate cleft on a three-dimensional (3D) model of the maxilla. For the position of osteotomy lines, two different models were assumed, with the osteotomy line on the affected side in model A and on the intact side in model B. In each model, DO screws were placed on two different positions, anteriorly (models A1 and B1) and posteriorly (models A2 and B2). Displacement pattern of the bony island in each of the four models, reaction forces at DO locations, and von Mises stress were estimated. Mesh generation and data processing were carried out in the 3D finite element analysis package (ABAQUS V6.7-1; Simulia Corp., Providence, RI, USA). RESULTS: In model B2, the island moved almost evenly, assuring a more complete closure of the cleft. The most uniform stress distribution was found in model B1. CONCLUSION: The results suggest that the best positions for the DO screw and the osteotomy line for closure of the cleft palate are posteriorly and on the intact side, respectively. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3955322/ /pubmed/24688567 Text en Copyright: © Dental Research Journal http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ghasemianpour, Majid
Ehsani, Sara
Tahmasbi, Soodeh
Bayat, Mohammad
Ghorbanpour, Maedeh
Safavi, Seyed Mohammadreza
Mirhashemi, Fatemeh Sadat
Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis
title Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis
title_full Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis
title_fullStr Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis
title_full_unstemmed Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis
title_short Distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: A finite element analysis
title_sort distraction osteogenesis for cleft palate closure: a finite element analysis
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955322/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688567
work_keys_str_mv AT ghasemianpourmajid distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis
AT ehsanisara distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis
AT tahmasbisoodeh distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis
AT bayatmohammad distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis
AT ghorbanpourmaedeh distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis
AT safaviseyedmohammadreza distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis
AT mirhashemifatemehsadat distractionosteogenesisforcleftpalateclosureafiniteelementanalysis