Cargando…
The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the accuracy of simple tumor localization, which is essential information that enables nerve-sparing surgery. We also sought to determine the optimal timing of a post-biop...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24407179 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122190 |
_version_ | 1782307560683995136 |
---|---|
author | Ko, Young Hwii Song, Phil Hyun Moon, Ki Hak Jung, Hee Chang Cheon, Jun Sung, Deuk Jae |
author_facet | Ko, Young Hwii Song, Phil Hyun Moon, Ki Hak Jung, Hee Chang Cheon, Jun Sung, Deuk Jae |
author_sort | Ko, Young Hwii |
collection | PubMed |
description | The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the accuracy of simple tumor localization, which is essential information that enables nerve-sparing surgery. We also sought to determine the optimal timing of a post-biopsy MRI. A total of 184 patients who had undergone MRI before radical prostatectomy at an institution without a predetermined schedule for MRI after a prostate biopsy were enrolled. The mean interval from the biopsy to the MRI was 30.8 ± 18.6 days. The accuracy of the MRI for simplified tumor location (right, left, bilateral and none) was 44.6%. In the group with discordant pathologic and MRI findings, the most common reason recorded was ‘MRI predicted a unilateral lesion, but pathology revealed bilateral lesions’ (58.3%), followed by ‘MRI predicted no lesion, but pathology revealed the presence of a lesion’ (32.0%). Multivariable analysis showed that the discordant group had a shorter interval (25.0 ± 14.3 vs 38.1 ± 20.6 days, P < 0.01) preceding the MRI and a higher rate of hemorrhage as observed by MRI (80.4% vs 54.8%, P < 0.01) in comparison with the accordant group. In receiver operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve of the MRI interval in accurate prediction of the tumor location was 0.707 (P < 0.001). At the MRI interval's cutoff of 28.5 days, the sensitivity was 73.2% and the specificity was 63.7%. When the MRI was performed within 28 days, the accumulated accuracy was only 26.1% (23/88); however, when it was performed after 28 days, the reversely accumulated accuracy was 61.5% (59/96). These data support a waiting period of at least 4 weeks after a biopsy before performing an MRI for the purposes of surgical refinement. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3955341 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39553412014-03-25 The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery Ko, Young Hwii Song, Phil Hyun Moon, Ki Hak Jung, Hee Chang Cheon, Jun Sung, Deuk Jae Asian J Androl Original Article The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the accuracy of simple tumor localization, which is essential information that enables nerve-sparing surgery. We also sought to determine the optimal timing of a post-biopsy MRI. A total of 184 patients who had undergone MRI before radical prostatectomy at an institution without a predetermined schedule for MRI after a prostate biopsy were enrolled. The mean interval from the biopsy to the MRI was 30.8 ± 18.6 days. The accuracy of the MRI for simplified tumor location (right, left, bilateral and none) was 44.6%. In the group with discordant pathologic and MRI findings, the most common reason recorded was ‘MRI predicted a unilateral lesion, but pathology revealed bilateral lesions’ (58.3%), followed by ‘MRI predicted no lesion, but pathology revealed the presence of a lesion’ (32.0%). Multivariable analysis showed that the discordant group had a shorter interval (25.0 ± 14.3 vs 38.1 ± 20.6 days, P < 0.01) preceding the MRI and a higher rate of hemorrhage as observed by MRI (80.4% vs 54.8%, P < 0.01) in comparison with the accordant group. In receiver operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve of the MRI interval in accurate prediction of the tumor location was 0.707 (P < 0.001). At the MRI interval's cutoff of 28.5 days, the sensitivity was 73.2% and the specificity was 63.7%. When the MRI was performed within 28 days, the accumulated accuracy was only 26.1% (23/88); however, when it was performed after 28 days, the reversely accumulated accuracy was 61.5% (59/96). These data support a waiting period of at least 4 weeks after a biopsy before performing an MRI for the purposes of surgical refinement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3955341/ /pubmed/24407179 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122190 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Ko, Young Hwii Song, Phil Hyun Moon, Ki Hak Jung, Hee Chang Cheon, Jun Sung, Deuk Jae The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
title | The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
title_full | The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
title_fullStr | The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
title_full_unstemmed | The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
title_short | The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
title_sort | optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955341/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24407179 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122190 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT koyounghwii theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT songphilhyun theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT moonkihak theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT jungheechang theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT cheonjun theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT sungdeukjae theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT koyounghwii optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT songphilhyun optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT moonkihak optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT jungheechang optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT cheonjun optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery AT sungdeukjae optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery |