Cargando…

The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery

The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the accuracy of simple tumor localization, which is essential information that enables nerve-sparing surgery. We also sought to determine the optimal timing of a post-biop...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ko, Young Hwii, Song, Phil Hyun, Moon, Ki Hak, Jung, Hee Chang, Cheon, Jun, Sung, Deuk Jae
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24407179
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122190
_version_ 1782307560683995136
author Ko, Young Hwii
Song, Phil Hyun
Moon, Ki Hak
Jung, Hee Chang
Cheon, Jun
Sung, Deuk Jae
author_facet Ko, Young Hwii
Song, Phil Hyun
Moon, Ki Hak
Jung, Hee Chang
Cheon, Jun
Sung, Deuk Jae
author_sort Ko, Young Hwii
collection PubMed
description The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the accuracy of simple tumor localization, which is essential information that enables nerve-sparing surgery. We also sought to determine the optimal timing of a post-biopsy MRI. A total of 184 patients who had undergone MRI before radical prostatectomy at an institution without a predetermined schedule for MRI after a prostate biopsy were enrolled. The mean interval from the biopsy to the MRI was 30.8 ± 18.6 days. The accuracy of the MRI for simplified tumor location (right, left, bilateral and none) was 44.6%. In the group with discordant pathologic and MRI findings, the most common reason recorded was ‘MRI predicted a unilateral lesion, but pathology revealed bilateral lesions’ (58.3%), followed by ‘MRI predicted no lesion, but pathology revealed the presence of a lesion’ (32.0%). Multivariable analysis showed that the discordant group had a shorter interval (25.0 ± 14.3 vs 38.1 ± 20.6 days, P < 0.01) preceding the MRI and a higher rate of hemorrhage as observed by MRI (80.4% vs 54.8%, P < 0.01) in comparison with the accordant group. In receiver operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve of the MRI interval in accurate prediction of the tumor location was 0.707 (P < 0.001). At the MRI interval's cutoff of 28.5 days, the sensitivity was 73.2% and the specificity was 63.7%. When the MRI was performed within 28 days, the accumulated accuracy was only 26.1% (23/88); however, when it was performed after 28 days, the reversely accumulated accuracy was 61.5% (59/96). These data support a waiting period of at least 4 weeks after a biopsy before performing an MRI for the purposes of surgical refinement.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955341
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39553412014-03-25 The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery Ko, Young Hwii Song, Phil Hyun Moon, Ki Hak Jung, Hee Chang Cheon, Jun Sung, Deuk Jae Asian J Androl Original Article The goal of our study was to evaluate the impact of the interval between prostate biopsy and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) on the accuracy of simple tumor localization, which is essential information that enables nerve-sparing surgery. We also sought to determine the optimal timing of a post-biopsy MRI. A total of 184 patients who had undergone MRI before radical prostatectomy at an institution without a predetermined schedule for MRI after a prostate biopsy were enrolled. The mean interval from the biopsy to the MRI was 30.8 ± 18.6 days. The accuracy of the MRI for simplified tumor location (right, left, bilateral and none) was 44.6%. In the group with discordant pathologic and MRI findings, the most common reason recorded was ‘MRI predicted a unilateral lesion, but pathology revealed bilateral lesions’ (58.3%), followed by ‘MRI predicted no lesion, but pathology revealed the presence of a lesion’ (32.0%). Multivariable analysis showed that the discordant group had a shorter interval (25.0 ± 14.3 vs 38.1 ± 20.6 days, P < 0.01) preceding the MRI and a higher rate of hemorrhage as observed by MRI (80.4% vs 54.8%, P < 0.01) in comparison with the accordant group. In receiver operating characteristics analysis, the area under the curve of the MRI interval in accurate prediction of the tumor location was 0.707 (P < 0.001). At the MRI interval's cutoff of 28.5 days, the sensitivity was 73.2% and the specificity was 63.7%. When the MRI was performed within 28 days, the accumulated accuracy was only 26.1% (23/88); however, when it was performed after 28 days, the reversely accumulated accuracy was 61.5% (59/96). These data support a waiting period of at least 4 weeks after a biopsy before performing an MRI for the purposes of surgical refinement. Medknow Publications & Media Pvt Ltd 2014 2014-01-20 /pmc/articles/PMC3955341/ /pubmed/24407179 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122190 Text en Copyright: © Asian Journal of Andrology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0 This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 3.0 Unported, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Ko, Young Hwii
Song, Phil Hyun
Moon, Ki Hak
Jung, Hee Chang
Cheon, Jun
Sung, Deuk Jae
The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
title The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
title_full The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
title_fullStr The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
title_full_unstemmed The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
title_short The optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
title_sort optimal timing of post-prostate biopsy magnetic resonance imaging to guide nerve-sparing surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955341/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24407179
http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/1008-682X.122190
work_keys_str_mv AT koyounghwii theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT songphilhyun theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT moonkihak theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT jungheechang theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT cheonjun theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT sungdeukjae theoptimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT koyounghwii optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT songphilhyun optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT moonkihak optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT jungheechang optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT cheonjun optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery
AT sungdeukjae optimaltimingofpostprostatebiopsymagneticresonanceimagingtoguidenervesparingsurgery