Cargando…

A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey

Objective: This study was conducted to describe the frequency of diabetes in dental patients, and to compare three different screening methods: the random finger plasma glucose (RFPG) test, the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) survey and a special clinical guideline developed for dental patien...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Cevik Akyil, Rahsan, Miloglu, Ozkan, Olgun, Nermin, Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639833
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4238
_version_ 1782307582794268672
author Cevik Akyil, Rahsan
Miloglu, Ozkan
Olgun, Nermin
Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim
author_facet Cevik Akyil, Rahsan
Miloglu, Ozkan
Olgun, Nermin
Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim
author_sort Cevik Akyil, Rahsan
collection PubMed
description Objective: This study was conducted to describe the frequency of diabetes in dental patients, and to compare three different screening methods: the random finger plasma glucose (RFPG) test, the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) survey and a special clinical guideline developed for dental patients. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional, descriptive and comparative. The data were collected between August 2011 and February 2012. A total of 702 dental patients participated in this study. The screening tools were RFPG, FINDRISC and a clinical guideline. Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, the t test, analysis of variance, and the Pearson correlation test. Results: The frequency of diabetes was 8.3% for the participants. The prevalence of participants at risk for undiagnosed diabetes was 20.1% according to the RFPG test, 29.9% according to the FINDRISC, and 29.8% according to the clinical guideline. Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the screening methods (p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: The overall frequency of diabetes was 8.3%. It was found that the three screening methods used in this study were statistically similar. However, FINDRISC and clinical guideline as the questionnaire screening tools indicated a little larger group than RFPG with respect to diabetes risk.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955544
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39555442014-03-17 A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey Cevik Akyil, Rahsan Miloglu, Ozkan Olgun, Nermin Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: This study was conducted to describe the frequency of diabetes in dental patients, and to compare three different screening methods: the random finger plasma glucose (RFPG) test, the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) survey and a special clinical guideline developed for dental patients. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional, descriptive and comparative. The data were collected between August 2011 and February 2012. A total of 702 dental patients participated in this study. The screening tools were RFPG, FINDRISC and a clinical guideline. Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, the t test, analysis of variance, and the Pearson correlation test. Results: The frequency of diabetes was 8.3% for the participants. The prevalence of participants at risk for undiagnosed diabetes was 20.1% according to the RFPG test, 29.9% according to the FINDRISC, and 29.8% according to the clinical guideline. Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the screening methods (p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: The overall frequency of diabetes was 8.3%. It was found that the three screening methods used in this study were statistically similar. However, FINDRISC and clinical guideline as the questionnaire screening tools indicated a little larger group than RFPG with respect to diabetes risk. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3955544/ /pubmed/24639833 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4238 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Cevik Akyil, Rahsan
Miloglu, Ozkan
Olgun, Nermin
Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim
A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
title A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
title_full A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
title_fullStr A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
title_full_unstemmed A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
title_short A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
title_sort comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in turkey
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955544/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639833
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4238
work_keys_str_mv AT cevikakyilrahsan acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT milogluozkan acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT olgunnermin acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT sevkibayrakdaribrahim acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT cevikakyilrahsan comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT milogluozkan comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT olgunnermin comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey
AT sevkibayrakdaribrahim comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey