Cargando…
A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey
Objective: This study was conducted to describe the frequency of diabetes in dental patients, and to compare three different screening methods: the random finger plasma glucose (RFPG) test, the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) survey and a special clinical guideline developed for dental patien...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Professional Medical Publicaitons
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639833 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4238 |
_version_ | 1782307582794268672 |
---|---|
author | Cevik Akyil, Rahsan Miloglu, Ozkan Olgun, Nermin Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim |
author_facet | Cevik Akyil, Rahsan Miloglu, Ozkan Olgun, Nermin Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim |
author_sort | Cevik Akyil, Rahsan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Objective: This study was conducted to describe the frequency of diabetes in dental patients, and to compare three different screening methods: the random finger plasma glucose (RFPG) test, the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) survey and a special clinical guideline developed for dental patients. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional, descriptive and comparative. The data were collected between August 2011 and February 2012. A total of 702 dental patients participated in this study. The screening tools were RFPG, FINDRISC and a clinical guideline. Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, the t test, analysis of variance, and the Pearson correlation test. Results: The frequency of diabetes was 8.3% for the participants. The prevalence of participants at risk for undiagnosed diabetes was 20.1% according to the RFPG test, 29.9% according to the FINDRISC, and 29.8% according to the clinical guideline. Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the screening methods (p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: The overall frequency of diabetes was 8.3%. It was found that the three screening methods used in this study were statistically similar. However, FINDRISC and clinical guideline as the questionnaire screening tools indicated a little larger group than RFPG with respect to diabetes risk. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3955544 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Professional Medical Publicaitons |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39555442014-03-17 A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey Cevik Akyil, Rahsan Miloglu, Ozkan Olgun, Nermin Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: This study was conducted to describe the frequency of diabetes in dental patients, and to compare three different screening methods: the random finger plasma glucose (RFPG) test, the Finnish diabetes risk score (FINDRISC) survey and a special clinical guideline developed for dental patients. Methods: The study design was cross-sectional, descriptive and comparative. The data were collected between August 2011 and February 2012. A total of 702 dental patients participated in this study. The screening tools were RFPG, FINDRISC and a clinical guideline. Data were analyzed using the Chi-squared test, the t test, analysis of variance, and the Pearson correlation test. Results: The frequency of diabetes was 8.3% for the participants. The prevalence of participants at risk for undiagnosed diabetes was 20.1% according to the RFPG test, 29.9% according to the FINDRISC, and 29.8% according to the clinical guideline. Correlation analysis showed a significant positive correlation between the screening methods (p<0.001 for each). Conclusion: The overall frequency of diabetes was 8.3%. It was found that the three screening methods used in this study were statistically similar. However, FINDRISC and clinical guideline as the questionnaire screening tools indicated a little larger group than RFPG with respect to diabetes risk. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3955544/ /pubmed/24639833 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4238 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Cevik Akyil, Rahsan Miloglu, Ozkan Olgun, Nermin Sevki Bayrakdar, Ibrahim A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey |
title | A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey |
title_full | A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey |
title_fullStr | A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey |
title_full_unstemmed | A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey |
title_short | A comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in Turkey |
title_sort | comparison of three different diabetes screening methods among dental patients in turkey |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955544/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639833 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4238 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT cevikakyilrahsan acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT milogluozkan acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT olgunnermin acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT sevkibayrakdaribrahim acomparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT cevikakyilrahsan comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT milogluozkan comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT olgunnermin comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey AT sevkibayrakdaribrahim comparisonofthreedifferentdiabetesscreeningmethodsamongdentalpatientsinturkey |