Cargando…

Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction

Objective: To report our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Methods: Retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi for a period of five and half years from May, 2006 to December, 2011. Al...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shahnawaz, Shahzad, Ali, Shahzad, Iqbal, Baloch, Muhammad Umar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639851
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.3201
_version_ 1782307586839674880
author Shahnawaz,
Shahzad, Ali
Shahzad, Iqbal
Baloch, Muhammad Umar
author_facet Shahnawaz,
Shahzad, Ali
Shahzad, Iqbal
Baloch, Muhammad Umar
author_sort Shahnawaz,
collection PubMed
description Objective: To report our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Methods: Retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi for a period of five and half years from May, 2006 to December, 2011. All patients with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction were entered into a database to record patients clinical features, diagnostic tools, operative and post-operative details and follow-up. Over a five-years period, 13 procedures were performed. After clinical evaluation all patient had extensive haematological and radiological workup for diagnosis of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. All were subjected to open pyeloplasties, out of these 13 patients; one had an aberrant lower pole vessel compressing uretero-pelvic-junction. All procedures were stented. Repair was done with 3/0 vicryl sutures all patients were catheterized and wound drained. Results: Mean operating time was 60 – 100 minutes with about 100cc blood loss requiring no transfusion. The mean follow up was one year. One patient developed post-operative haematuria and was managed conservatively. Two patients developed fever secondary to urinary tract infection despite adequate treatment of urinary tract infection according to culture and sensitivity pre-operatively. One patient developed surgical emphysema detected post-operatively, which required tube thoracostomy. Neither patient developed recurrent symptoms nor had any evidence of obstruction on the renogram on follow-up. Objectively all patients were followed up by intravenous urogram, stress renogram, Urine C/S. Subjective and objective follow-up revealed success in 100% of patients whereas success is defined as no or minimal holder on DTPA renogram, improving renal function and decreasing dilatation on successive intravenous urogram. All patients had a mean post-operative hospital stay of 02 – 04 days Folley catheter was removed after 10-days, double-j- stents were removed after two to three weeks. Conclusion: Our success rate following open pyeloplasty with limited follow-up was 100%. It is comparable with International data. Recent international trend is toward Uretro-pelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) repair with laparoscopic approach, they are claiming success rate of 95%.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955562
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39555622014-03-17 Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction Shahnawaz, Shahzad, Ali Shahzad, Iqbal Baloch, Muhammad Umar Pak J Med Sci Original Article Objective: To report our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. Methods: Retrospective study was conducted in the Department of Urology, Jinnah Postgraduate Medical Centre, Karachi for a period of five and half years from May, 2006 to December, 2011. All patients with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction were entered into a database to record patients clinical features, diagnostic tools, operative and post-operative details and follow-up. Over a five-years period, 13 procedures were performed. After clinical evaluation all patient had extensive haematological and radiological workup for diagnosis of uretero-pelvic junction obstruction. All were subjected to open pyeloplasties, out of these 13 patients; one had an aberrant lower pole vessel compressing uretero-pelvic-junction. All procedures were stented. Repair was done with 3/0 vicryl sutures all patients were catheterized and wound drained. Results: Mean operating time was 60 – 100 minutes with about 100cc blood loss requiring no transfusion. The mean follow up was one year. One patient developed post-operative haematuria and was managed conservatively. Two patients developed fever secondary to urinary tract infection despite adequate treatment of urinary tract infection according to culture and sensitivity pre-operatively. One patient developed surgical emphysema detected post-operatively, which required tube thoracostomy. Neither patient developed recurrent symptoms nor had any evidence of obstruction on the renogram on follow-up. Objectively all patients were followed up by intravenous urogram, stress renogram, Urine C/S. Subjective and objective follow-up revealed success in 100% of patients whereas success is defined as no or minimal holder on DTPA renogram, improving renal function and decreasing dilatation on successive intravenous urogram. All patients had a mean post-operative hospital stay of 02 – 04 days Folley catheter was removed after 10-days, double-j- stents were removed after two to three weeks. Conclusion: Our success rate following open pyeloplasty with limited follow-up was 100%. It is comparable with International data. Recent international trend is toward Uretro-pelvic Junction Obstruction (UPJO) repair with laparoscopic approach, they are claiming success rate of 95%. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3955562/ /pubmed/24639851 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.3201 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Shahnawaz,
Shahzad, Ali
Shahzad, Iqbal
Baloch, Muhammad Umar
Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
title Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
title_full Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
title_fullStr Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
title_full_unstemmed Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
title_short Our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
title_sort our experience with open dismembered pyeloplasty for uretero-pelvic junction obstruction
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955562/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639851
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.3201
work_keys_str_mv AT shahnawaz ourexperiencewithopendismemberedpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT shahzadali ourexperiencewithopendismemberedpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT shahzadiqbal ourexperiencewithopendismemberedpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction
AT balochmuhammadumar ourexperiencewithopendismemberedpyeloplastyforureteropelvicjunctionobstruction