Cargando…

Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review

The bone age of a child indicates his/her level of biological and structural maturity better than the chronological age calculated from the date of birth. Radiography of the hand & wrist is the commonest modality used to calculate bone age. Automated methods for evaluation of hand and wrist radi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Manzoor Mughal, Arsalan, Hassan, Nuzhat, Ahmed, Anwar
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639863
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4295
_version_ 1782307589524029440
author Manzoor Mughal, Arsalan
Hassan, Nuzhat
Ahmed, Anwar
author_facet Manzoor Mughal, Arsalan
Hassan, Nuzhat
Ahmed, Anwar
author_sort Manzoor Mughal, Arsalan
collection PubMed
description The bone age of a child indicates his/her level of biological and structural maturity better than the chronological age calculated from the date of birth. Radiography of the hand & wrist is the commonest modality used to calculate bone age. Automated methods for evaluation of hand and wrist radiographs are also being developed which reduce inter rater variability compared to manual methods. Non radiation based techniques of visualizing hand & wrist bones such as ultrasonography for bone age calculation have been theorized but are not as accurate as radiographic methods. By the age of 18 years, bone age cannot be computed from hand & wrist radiographs, therefore the medial end of the clavicle is used for bone age calculation in individuals aged 18—22 years. CT visualization of the clavicle has been extensively studied but requires a high dose of radiation. MRI based methods are being developed but require more research. Dental age is an alternate form of bone age determination, which also gives an estimate of skeletal maturity. The iliac bone and femoral head have also been studied for computation of bone age but no standardized methods have yet been generated. As different modalities of bone age estimation provide different results and their applicability differs in different ethnicities, we need to design studies in order to compare them and select the method best suited to Pakistani children. Sources of Data/Study Selection: Recent articles published between years 2004-2013 obtained from online search engines Pubmed and Google Scholar were used in preparation of this review.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955574
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Professional Medical Publicaitons
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39555742014-03-17 Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review Manzoor Mughal, Arsalan Hassan, Nuzhat Ahmed, Anwar Pak J Med Sci Review Article The bone age of a child indicates his/her level of biological and structural maturity better than the chronological age calculated from the date of birth. Radiography of the hand & wrist is the commonest modality used to calculate bone age. Automated methods for evaluation of hand and wrist radiographs are also being developed which reduce inter rater variability compared to manual methods. Non radiation based techniques of visualizing hand & wrist bones such as ultrasonography for bone age calculation have been theorized but are not as accurate as radiographic methods. By the age of 18 years, bone age cannot be computed from hand & wrist radiographs, therefore the medial end of the clavicle is used for bone age calculation in individuals aged 18—22 years. CT visualization of the clavicle has been extensively studied but requires a high dose of radiation. MRI based methods are being developed but require more research. Dental age is an alternate form of bone age determination, which also gives an estimate of skeletal maturity. The iliac bone and femoral head have also been studied for computation of bone age but no standardized methods have yet been generated. As different modalities of bone age estimation provide different results and their applicability differs in different ethnicities, we need to design studies in order to compare them and select the method best suited to Pakistani children. Sources of Data/Study Selection: Recent articles published between years 2004-2013 obtained from online search engines Pubmed and Google Scholar were used in preparation of this review. Professional Medical Publicaitons 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3955574/ /pubmed/24639863 http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4295 Text en This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/) which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Review Article
Manzoor Mughal, Arsalan
Hassan, Nuzhat
Ahmed, Anwar
Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review
title Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review
title_full Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review
title_fullStr Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review
title_full_unstemmed Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review
title_short Bone Age Assessment Methods: A Critical Review
title_sort bone age assessment methods: a critical review
topic Review Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955574/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24639863
http://dx.doi.org/10.12669/pjms.301.4295
work_keys_str_mv AT manzoormughalarsalan boneageassessmentmethodsacriticalreview
AT hassannuzhat boneageassessmentmethodsacriticalreview
AT ahmedanwar boneageassessmentmethodsacriticalreview