Cargando…

The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND DESIGN: Measured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) health care system w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Drewnowski, Adam, Rehm, Colin D, Arterburn, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.179
_version_ 1782307618312683520
author Drewnowski, Adam
Rehm, Colin D
Arterburn, David
author_facet Drewnowski, Adam
Rehm, Colin D
Arterburn, David
author_sort Drewnowski, Adam
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND DESIGN: Measured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) health care system were used to estimate obesity prevalence at the CT level. CT-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) were median home values of owner-occupied housing units, percent of residents with a college degree, and median household incomes, all drawn from the 2000 Census. Spatial regression models were used to assess the relation between CT-level obesity prevalence and socio-economic variables. RESULTS: Smoothed CT obesity prevalence, obtained using an Empirical Bayes tool, ranged from 16.2% to 43.7% (a 2.7-fold difference). The spatial pattern of obesity was non-random, showing a concentration in south and southeast King County. In spatial regression models, CT-level home values and college education were more strongly associated with obesity than household incomes. For each additional $100 000 in median home values, CT obesity prevalence was 2.3% lower. The three SES factors together explained 70% of the variance in CT obesity prevalence after accounting for population density, race/ethnicity, age and spatial dependence. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to show major social disparities in adult obesity prevalence at the CT scale that is based, moreover, on measured heights and weights. Analyses of data at sufficiently fine geographic scale are needed to guide targeted local interventions to stem the obesity epidemic.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39557432014-12-01 The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA Drewnowski, Adam Rehm, Colin D Arterburn, David Int J Obes (Lond) Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND DESIGN: Measured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) health care system were used to estimate obesity prevalence at the CT level. CT-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) were median home values of owner-occupied housing units, percent of residents with a college degree, and median household incomes, all drawn from the 2000 Census. Spatial regression models were used to assess the relation between CT-level obesity prevalence and socio-economic variables. RESULTS: Smoothed CT obesity prevalence, obtained using an Empirical Bayes tool, ranged from 16.2% to 43.7% (a 2.7-fold difference). The spatial pattern of obesity was non-random, showing a concentration in south and southeast King County. In spatial regression models, CT-level home values and college education were more strongly associated with obesity than household incomes. For each additional $100 000 in median home values, CT obesity prevalence was 2.3% lower. The three SES factors together explained 70% of the variance in CT obesity prevalence after accounting for population density, race/ethnicity, age and spatial dependence. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to show major social disparities in adult obesity prevalence at the CT scale that is based, moreover, on measured heights and weights. Analyses of data at sufficiently fine geographic scale are needed to guide targeted local interventions to stem the obesity epidemic. 2013-09-16 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3955743/ /pubmed/24037278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.179 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms
spellingShingle Article
Drewnowski, Adam
Rehm, Colin D
Arterburn, David
The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
title The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
title_full The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
title_fullStr The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
title_full_unstemmed The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
title_short The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
title_sort geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in king county, wa
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037278
http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.179
work_keys_str_mv AT drewnowskiadam thegeographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa
AT rehmcolind thegeographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa
AT arterburndavid thegeographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa
AT drewnowskiadam geographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa
AT rehmcolind geographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa
AT arterburndavid geographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa