Cargando…
The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND DESIGN: Measured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) health care system w...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.179 |
_version_ | 1782307618312683520 |
---|---|
author | Drewnowski, Adam Rehm, Colin D Arterburn, David |
author_facet | Drewnowski, Adam Rehm, Colin D Arterburn, David |
author_sort | Drewnowski, Adam |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND DESIGN: Measured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) health care system were used to estimate obesity prevalence at the CT level. CT-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) were median home values of owner-occupied housing units, percent of residents with a college degree, and median household incomes, all drawn from the 2000 Census. Spatial regression models were used to assess the relation between CT-level obesity prevalence and socio-economic variables. RESULTS: Smoothed CT obesity prevalence, obtained using an Empirical Bayes tool, ranged from 16.2% to 43.7% (a 2.7-fold difference). The spatial pattern of obesity was non-random, showing a concentration in south and southeast King County. In spatial regression models, CT-level home values and college education were more strongly associated with obesity than household incomes. For each additional $100 000 in median home values, CT obesity prevalence was 2.3% lower. The three SES factors together explained 70% of the variance in CT obesity prevalence after accounting for population density, race/ethnicity, age and spatial dependence. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to show major social disparities in adult obesity prevalence at the CT scale that is based, moreover, on measured heights and weights. Analyses of data at sufficiently fine geographic scale are needed to guide targeted local interventions to stem the obesity epidemic. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3955743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39557432014-12-01 The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA Drewnowski, Adam Rehm, Colin D Arterburn, David Int J Obes (Lond) Article OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the geographic concentration of adult obesity prevalence by census tract (CT) in King County, WA, in relation to social and economic factors. METHODS AND DESIGN: Measured heights and weights from 59 767 adult men and women enrolled in the Group Health (GH) health care system were used to estimate obesity prevalence at the CT level. CT-level measures of socioeconomic status (SES) were median home values of owner-occupied housing units, percent of residents with a college degree, and median household incomes, all drawn from the 2000 Census. Spatial regression models were used to assess the relation between CT-level obesity prevalence and socio-economic variables. RESULTS: Smoothed CT obesity prevalence, obtained using an Empirical Bayes tool, ranged from 16.2% to 43.7% (a 2.7-fold difference). The spatial pattern of obesity was non-random, showing a concentration in south and southeast King County. In spatial regression models, CT-level home values and college education were more strongly associated with obesity than household incomes. For each additional $100 000 in median home values, CT obesity prevalence was 2.3% lower. The three SES factors together explained 70% of the variance in CT obesity prevalence after accounting for population density, race/ethnicity, age and spatial dependence. CONCLUSIONS: To our knowledge, this is the first report to show major social disparities in adult obesity prevalence at the CT scale that is based, moreover, on measured heights and weights. Analyses of data at sufficiently fine geographic scale are needed to guide targeted local interventions to stem the obesity epidemic. 2013-09-16 2014-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3955743/ /pubmed/24037278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.179 Text en Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms |
spellingShingle | Article Drewnowski, Adam Rehm, Colin D Arterburn, David The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA |
title | The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA |
title_full | The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA |
title_fullStr | The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA |
title_full_unstemmed | The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA |
title_short | The geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in King County, WA |
title_sort | geographic distribution of obesity by census tract among 59 767 insured adults in king county, wa |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24037278 http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/ijo.2013.179 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT drewnowskiadam thegeographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa AT rehmcolind thegeographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa AT arterburndavid thegeographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa AT drewnowskiadam geographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa AT rehmcolind geographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa AT arterburndavid geographicdistributionofobesitybycensustractamong59767insuredadultsinkingcountywa |