Cargando…

Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of spinal and paraspinal anatomic markers in both the diagnosis of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and identification of vertebral levels on lumbar MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar MRI from 1049 adult patients were studied. By comparing with the whole-sp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tokgoz, Nil, Ucar, Murat, Erdogan, Aylin Billur, Kilic, Koray, Ozcan, Cahide
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: The Korean Society of Radiology 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24644411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258
_version_ 1782307625136816128
author Tokgoz, Nil
Ucar, Murat
Erdogan, Aylin Billur
Kilic, Koray
Ozcan, Cahide
author_facet Tokgoz, Nil
Ucar, Murat
Erdogan, Aylin Billur
Kilic, Koray
Ozcan, Cahide
author_sort Tokgoz, Nil
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of spinal and paraspinal anatomic markers in both the diagnosis of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and identification of vertebral levels on lumbar MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar MRI from 1049 adult patients were studied. By comparing with the whole-spine localizer, the diagnostic errors in numbering vertebral segments on lumbar MRI were evaluated. The morphology of S1-2 disc, L5 and S1 body, and lumbar spinous processes (SPs) were evaluated by using sagittal MRI. The positions of right renal artery (RRA), superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation (AB) and conus medullaris (CM) were described. RESULTS: The diagnostic error for evaluation of vertebral segmentation on lumbar MRI alone was 14.1%. In lumbarization, all patients revealed a well-formed S1-2 disc with squared S1 body. A rhombus-shaped L5 body in sacralization and a rectangular-shaped S1 body in lumbarization were found. The L3 had the longest SP. The most common sites of spinal and paraspinal structures were: RRA at L1 body (53.6%) and L1-2 disc (34.1%), superior mesenteric artery at L1 body (55.1%) and T12-L1 disc (31.6%), and AB at L4 body (71.1%). CM had variable locations, changing from the T12-L1 disc to L2 body. They were located at higher sacralization and lower lumbarization. CONCLUSION: The spinal morphologic features and locations of the spinal and paraspinal structures on lumbar MRI are not completely reliable for the diagnosis of LSTVs and identification on the vertebral levels.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3955794
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher The Korean Society of Radiology
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39557942014-03-18 Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae? Tokgoz, Nil Ucar, Murat Erdogan, Aylin Billur Kilic, Koray Ozcan, Cahide Korean J Radiol Musculoskeletal Imaging OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the value of spinal and paraspinal anatomic markers in both the diagnosis of lumbosacral transitional vertebrae (LSTVs) and identification of vertebral levels on lumbar MRI. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Lumbar MRI from 1049 adult patients were studied. By comparing with the whole-spine localizer, the diagnostic errors in numbering vertebral segments on lumbar MRI were evaluated. The morphology of S1-2 disc, L5 and S1 body, and lumbar spinous processes (SPs) were evaluated by using sagittal MRI. The positions of right renal artery (RRA), superior mesenteric artery, aortic bifurcation (AB) and conus medullaris (CM) were described. RESULTS: The diagnostic error for evaluation of vertebral segmentation on lumbar MRI alone was 14.1%. In lumbarization, all patients revealed a well-formed S1-2 disc with squared S1 body. A rhombus-shaped L5 body in sacralization and a rectangular-shaped S1 body in lumbarization were found. The L3 had the longest SP. The most common sites of spinal and paraspinal structures were: RRA at L1 body (53.6%) and L1-2 disc (34.1%), superior mesenteric artery at L1 body (55.1%) and T12-L1 disc (31.6%), and AB at L4 body (71.1%). CM had variable locations, changing from the T12-L1 disc to L2 body. They were located at higher sacralization and lower lumbarization. CONCLUSION: The spinal morphologic features and locations of the spinal and paraspinal structures on lumbar MRI are not completely reliable for the diagnosis of LSTVs and identification on the vertebral levels. The Korean Society of Radiology 2014 2014-03-07 /pmc/articles/PMC3955794/ /pubmed/24644411 http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Society of Radiology http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Musculoskeletal Imaging
Tokgoz, Nil
Ucar, Murat
Erdogan, Aylin Billur
Kilic, Koray
Ozcan, Cahide
Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?
title Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?
title_full Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?
title_fullStr Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?
title_full_unstemmed Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?
title_short Are Spinal or Paraspinal Anatomic Markers Helpful for Vertebral Numbering and Diagnosing Lumbosacral Transitional Vertebrae?
title_sort are spinal or paraspinal anatomic markers helpful for vertebral numbering and diagnosing lumbosacral transitional vertebrae?
topic Musculoskeletal Imaging
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3955794/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24644411
http://dx.doi.org/10.3348/kjr.2014.15.2.258
work_keys_str_mv AT tokgoznil arespinalorparaspinalanatomicmarkershelpfulforvertebralnumberinganddiagnosinglumbosacraltransitionalvertebrae
AT ucarmurat arespinalorparaspinalanatomicmarkershelpfulforvertebralnumberinganddiagnosinglumbosacraltransitionalvertebrae
AT erdoganaylinbillur arespinalorparaspinalanatomicmarkershelpfulforvertebralnumberinganddiagnosinglumbosacraltransitionalvertebrae
AT kilickoray arespinalorparaspinalanatomicmarkershelpfulforvertebralnumberinganddiagnosinglumbosacraltransitionalvertebrae
AT ozcancahide arespinalorparaspinalanatomicmarkershelpfulforvertebralnumberinganddiagnosinglumbosacraltransitionalvertebrae