Cargando…

Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods

Abstract Introduction: Pilonidal disease is a very common anorectal problem without a clinical consensus on its optimal management. Objective: To compare the methods used by our clinic and determine the outcomes in relation to healing, hospitalization time and recurrence. Materials and Methods: We h...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Varnalidis, I, Ioannidis, O, Paraskevas, G, Papapostolou, D, Malakozis, SG, Gatzos, S, Tsigkriki, L, Ntoumpara, M, Papadopoulou, A, Makrantonakis, A, Makrantonakis, N
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Carol Davila University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653753
_version_ 1782307649390379008
author Varnalidis, I
Ioannidis, O
Paraskevas, G
Papapostolou, D
Malakozis, SG
Gatzos, S
Tsigkriki, L
Ntoumpara, M
Papadopoulou, A
Makrantonakis, A
Makrantonakis, N
author_facet Varnalidis, I
Ioannidis, O
Paraskevas, G
Papapostolou, D
Malakozis, SG
Gatzos, S
Tsigkriki, L
Ntoumpara, M
Papadopoulou, A
Makrantonakis, A
Makrantonakis, N
author_sort Varnalidis, I
collection PubMed
description Abstract Introduction: Pilonidal disease is a very common anorectal problem without a clinical consensus on its optimal management. Objective: To compare the methods used by our clinic and determine the outcomes in relation to healing, hospitalization time and recurrence. Materials and Methods: We have studied all the cases of patients with pilonidal sinus that were treated surgically in our clinic from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999. Results: A total of 111 patients were treated of whom 92 (82,8%) were men and 19 (17,2%) were women. Ages ranged from16 to 65 years with an average age of about 25,1 years. Of the 111 patients, 63 were treated with marsupializationand the remaining 48 were treated by excision (29 with open excision and 19 with the primary suture technique). One hundred and two (91,9%) patients were discharged from the hospital after the surgical procedure, while the remaining 9 patients were hospitalized for 24 hours. The healing time for marsupialization was 27,3 days, the primary suture technique was 11,7 days and the open excision method took 46,4 days. Recurrence was observed in 16 patients (14,4%). Recurrence appeared in 4 (6,35%) of the 63 patients subjected to marsupialization, 1 of the 29 patients subjected to open incision, and 11 (57,8%) of the 19 patients subjected to primary closure. Conclusion: In the absence of inflammation and/or recurrence, marsupialization is the surgical method of choice as it has a low percentage of recurrence and an acceptably short healing period.In apparently large, inflamed and recurrent situations, open excision is preferred.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3956091
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Carol Davila University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39560912014-05-15 Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods Varnalidis, I Ioannidis, O Paraskevas, G Papapostolou, D Malakozis, SG Gatzos, S Tsigkriki, L Ntoumpara, M Papadopoulou, A Makrantonakis, A Makrantonakis, N J Med Life Original Article Abstract Introduction: Pilonidal disease is a very common anorectal problem without a clinical consensus on its optimal management. Objective: To compare the methods used by our clinic and determine the outcomes in relation to healing, hospitalization time and recurrence. Materials and Methods: We have studied all the cases of patients with pilonidal sinus that were treated surgically in our clinic from January 1, 1997 to December 31, 1999. Results: A total of 111 patients were treated of whom 92 (82,8%) were men and 19 (17,2%) were women. Ages ranged from16 to 65 years with an average age of about 25,1 years. Of the 111 patients, 63 were treated with marsupializationand the remaining 48 were treated by excision (29 with open excision and 19 with the primary suture technique). One hundred and two (91,9%) patients were discharged from the hospital after the surgical procedure, while the remaining 9 patients were hospitalized for 24 hours. The healing time for marsupialization was 27,3 days, the primary suture technique was 11,7 days and the open excision method took 46,4 days. Recurrence was observed in 16 patients (14,4%). Recurrence appeared in 4 (6,35%) of the 63 patients subjected to marsupialization, 1 of the 29 patients subjected to open incision, and 11 (57,8%) of the 19 patients subjected to primary closure. Conclusion: In the absence of inflammation and/or recurrence, marsupialization is the surgical method of choice as it has a low percentage of recurrence and an acceptably short healing period.In apparently large, inflamed and recurrent situations, open excision is preferred. Carol Davila University Press 2014-03-15 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3956091/ /pubmed/24653753 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Article
Varnalidis, I
Ioannidis, O
Paraskevas, G
Papapostolou, D
Malakozis, SG
Gatzos, S
Tsigkriki, L
Ntoumpara, M
Papadopoulou, A
Makrantonakis, A
Makrantonakis, N
Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
title Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
title_full Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
title_fullStr Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
title_full_unstemmed Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
title_short Pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
title_sort pilonidal sinus: a comparative study of treatment methods
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956091/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653753
work_keys_str_mv AT varnalidisi pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT ioannidiso pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT paraskevasg pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT papapostoloud pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT malakozissg pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT gatzoss pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT tsigkrikil pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT ntoumparam pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT papadopouloua pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT makrantonakisa pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods
AT makrantonakisn pilonidalsinusacomparativestudyoftreatmentmethods