Cargando…

Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy

Rationale The current standard surgical treatment for the cervix and uterine cancer is the radical hysterectomy (lymphadenohysterocolpectomy). This has the risk of intraoperative accidents and postoperative associated morbidity. Objective The purpose of this article is the evaluation and quantificat...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Marin, F, Pleşca, M, Bordea, CI, Voinea, SC, Burlănescu, I, Ichim, E, Jianu, CG, Nicolăescu, RR, Teodosie, MP, Maher, K, Blidaru, A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Carol Davila University Press 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653760
_version_ 1782307651218046976
author Marin, F
Pleşca, M
Bordea, CI
Voinea, SC
Burlănescu, I
Ichim, E
Jianu, CG
Nicolăescu, RR
Teodosie, MP
Maher, K
Blidaru, A
author_facet Marin, F
Pleşca, M
Bordea, CI
Voinea, SC
Burlănescu, I
Ichim, E
Jianu, CG
Nicolăescu, RR
Teodosie, MP
Maher, K
Blidaru, A
author_sort Marin, F
collection PubMed
description Rationale The current standard surgical treatment for the cervix and uterine cancer is the radical hysterectomy (lymphadenohysterocolpectomy). This has the risk of intraoperative accidents and postoperative associated morbidity. Objective The purpose of this article is the evaluation and quantification of the associated complications in comparison to the postoperative morbidity which resulted after different types of radical hysterectomy. Methods and results Patients were divided according to the type of surgery performed as follows: for cervical cancer – group A- 37 classic radical hysterectomies Class III Piver - Rutledge -Smith ( PRS ), group B -208 modified radical hysterectomies Class II PRS and for uterine cancer- group C -79 extended hysterectomies with pelvic lymphadenectomy from which 17 patients with paraaortic lymphnode biopsy . All patients performed preoperative radiotherapy and 88 of them associated radiosensitization. Discussion Early complications were intra-abdominal bleeding ( 2.7% Class III PRS vs 0.48% Class II PRS), supra-aponeurotic hematoma ( 5.4% III vs 2.4% II) , dynamic ileus (2.7% III vs 0.96% II) and uro - genital fistulas (5.4% III vs 0.96% II).The late complications were the bladder dysfunction (21.6% III vs 16.35% II) , lower limb lymphedema (13.5% III vs 11.5% II), urethral strictures (10.8% III vs 4.8% II) , incisional hernias ( 8.1% III vs 7.2% II), persistent pelvic pain (18.91% III vs 7.7% II), bowel obstruction (5.4% III vs 1.4% II) and deterioration of sexual function (83.3% III vs 53.8% II). PRS class II radical hysterectomy is associated with fewer complications than PRS class III radical hysterectomy , except for the complications of lymphadenectomy . A new method that might reduce these complications is a selective lymphadenectomy represented by sentinel node biopsy . In conclusion PRS class II radical hysterectomy associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy is a therapeutic option for the incipient stages of cervical cancer. Abbreviations: PRS- Piver Rutledge-Smith, II- class II, III- class III
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3956099
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Carol Davila University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39560992014-05-15 Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy Marin, F Pleşca, M Bordea, CI Voinea, SC Burlănescu, I Ichim, E Jianu, CG Nicolăescu, RR Teodosie, MP Maher, K Blidaru, A J Med Life Case Presentation Rationale The current standard surgical treatment for the cervix and uterine cancer is the radical hysterectomy (lymphadenohysterocolpectomy). This has the risk of intraoperative accidents and postoperative associated morbidity. Objective The purpose of this article is the evaluation and quantification of the associated complications in comparison to the postoperative morbidity which resulted after different types of radical hysterectomy. Methods and results Patients were divided according to the type of surgery performed as follows: for cervical cancer – group A- 37 classic radical hysterectomies Class III Piver - Rutledge -Smith ( PRS ), group B -208 modified radical hysterectomies Class II PRS and for uterine cancer- group C -79 extended hysterectomies with pelvic lymphadenectomy from which 17 patients with paraaortic lymphnode biopsy . All patients performed preoperative radiotherapy and 88 of them associated radiosensitization. Discussion Early complications were intra-abdominal bleeding ( 2.7% Class III PRS vs 0.48% Class II PRS), supra-aponeurotic hematoma ( 5.4% III vs 2.4% II) , dynamic ileus (2.7% III vs 0.96% II) and uro - genital fistulas (5.4% III vs 0.96% II).The late complications were the bladder dysfunction (21.6% III vs 16.35% II) , lower limb lymphedema (13.5% III vs 11.5% II), urethral strictures (10.8% III vs 4.8% II) , incisional hernias ( 8.1% III vs 7.2% II), persistent pelvic pain (18.91% III vs 7.7% II), bowel obstruction (5.4% III vs 1.4% II) and deterioration of sexual function (83.3% III vs 53.8% II). PRS class II radical hysterectomy is associated with fewer complications than PRS class III radical hysterectomy , except for the complications of lymphadenectomy . A new method that might reduce these complications is a selective lymphadenectomy represented by sentinel node biopsy . In conclusion PRS class II radical hysterectomy associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy is a therapeutic option for the incipient stages of cervical cancer. Abbreviations: PRS- Piver Rutledge-Smith, II- class II, III- class III Carol Davila University Press 2014-03-15 2014-03-25 /pmc/articles/PMC3956099/ /pubmed/24653760 Text en ©Carol Davila University Press http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/2.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Case Presentation
Marin, F
Pleşca, M
Bordea, CI
Voinea, SC
Burlănescu, I
Ichim, E
Jianu, CG
Nicolăescu, RR
Teodosie, MP
Maher, K
Blidaru, A
Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
title Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
title_full Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
title_fullStr Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
title_full_unstemmed Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
title_short Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
title_sort postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy
topic Case Presentation
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956099/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653760
work_keys_str_mv AT marinf postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT plescam postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT bordeaci postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT voineasc postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT burlanescui postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT ichime postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT jianucg postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT nicolaescurr postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT teodosiemp postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT maherk postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy
AT blidarua postoperativesurgicalcomplicationsoflymphadenohysterocolpectomy