Cargando…

The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources

Streptococcus mutans is the main etiological agent for dental caries. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a new modality in bacterial decontamination. OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial PDT us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: HAKIMIHA, Neda, KHOEI, Farzaneh, BAHADOR, Abbas, FEKRAZAD, Reza
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24676576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130038
_version_ 1782307662239629312
author HAKIMIHA, Neda
KHOEI, Farzaneh
BAHADOR, Abbas
FEKRAZAD, Reza
author_facet HAKIMIHA, Neda
KHOEI, Farzaneh
BAHADOR, Abbas
FEKRAZAD, Reza
author_sort HAKIMIHA, Neda
collection PubMed
description Streptococcus mutans is the main etiological agent for dental caries. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a new modality in bacterial decontamination. OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial PDT using two different photosensitizers and light sources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard suspensions of S. mutans were exposed to laser light at 662 nm and Radachlorin(®) or LED 630 nm in combination with Toluidine blue O (TBO). Radiation-only groups, photosensitizer alone, and groups with no treatment were used as controls. Bacterial suspension from each treatment was subcultured onto the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plates and bacterial growth was assessed. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (p<0.05). RESULTS: PDT with TBO and Radachlorin(®) significantly reduced S. mutans viability, whereas no difference was observed between two groups of PDT. In the groups treated just with the photosensitizer or irradiated alone, no significant reduction of S. mutans colonies was observed. CONCLUSION: S. mutans colonies were susceptible to either 662 nm laser or LED light in the presence of Radachlorin(®) and TBO respectively with no priority.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3956397
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39563972014-03-18 The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources HAKIMIHA, Neda KHOEI, Farzaneh BAHADOR, Abbas FEKRAZAD, Reza J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles Streptococcus mutans is the main etiological agent for dental caries. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a new modality in bacterial decontamination. OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial PDT using two different photosensitizers and light sources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard suspensions of S. mutans were exposed to laser light at 662 nm and Radachlorin(®) or LED 630 nm in combination with Toluidine blue O (TBO). Radiation-only groups, photosensitizer alone, and groups with no treatment were used as controls. Bacterial suspension from each treatment was subcultured onto the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plates and bacterial growth was assessed. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (p<0.05). RESULTS: PDT with TBO and Radachlorin(®) significantly reduced S. mutans viability, whereas no difference was observed between two groups of PDT. In the groups treated just with the photosensitizer or irradiated alone, no significant reduction of S. mutans colonies was observed. CONCLUSION: S. mutans colonies were susceptible to either 662 nm laser or LED light in the presence of Radachlorin(®) and TBO respectively with no priority. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3956397/ /pubmed/24676576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130038 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Original Articles
HAKIMIHA, Neda
KHOEI, Farzaneh
BAHADOR, Abbas
FEKRAZAD, Reza
The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
title The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
title_full The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
title_fullStr The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
title_full_unstemmed The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
title_short The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
title_sort susceptibility of streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
topic Original Articles
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956397/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24676576
http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130038
work_keys_str_mv AT hakimihaneda thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT khoeifarzaneh thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT bahadorabbas thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT fekrazadreza thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT hakimihaneda susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT khoeifarzaneh susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT bahadorabbas susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources
AT fekrazadreza susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources