Cargando…
The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources
Streptococcus mutans is the main etiological agent for dental caries. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a new modality in bacterial decontamination. OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial PDT us...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24676576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130038 |
_version_ | 1782307662239629312 |
---|---|
author | HAKIMIHA, Neda KHOEI, Farzaneh BAHADOR, Abbas FEKRAZAD, Reza |
author_facet | HAKIMIHA, Neda KHOEI, Farzaneh BAHADOR, Abbas FEKRAZAD, Reza |
author_sort | HAKIMIHA, Neda |
collection | PubMed |
description | Streptococcus mutans is the main etiological agent for dental caries. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a new modality in bacterial decontamination. OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial PDT using two different photosensitizers and light sources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard suspensions of S. mutans were exposed to laser light at 662 nm and Radachlorin(®) or LED 630 nm in combination with Toluidine blue O (TBO). Radiation-only groups, photosensitizer alone, and groups with no treatment were used as controls. Bacterial suspension from each treatment was subcultured onto the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plates and bacterial growth was assessed. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (p<0.05). RESULTS: PDT with TBO and Radachlorin(®) significantly reduced S. mutans viability, whereas no difference was observed between two groups of PDT. In the groups treated just with the photosensitizer or irradiated alone, no significant reduction of S. mutans colonies was observed. CONCLUSION: S. mutans colonies were susceptible to either 662 nm laser or LED light in the presence of Radachlorin(®) and TBO respectively with no priority. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3956397 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São
Paulo |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39563972014-03-18 The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources HAKIMIHA, Neda KHOEI, Farzaneh BAHADOR, Abbas FEKRAZAD, Reza J Appl Oral Sci Original Articles Streptococcus mutans is the main etiological agent for dental caries. Recently, photodynamic therapy (PDT) has been introduced as a new modality in bacterial decontamination. OBJECTIVE: This in vitro study was carried out to evaluate the susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial PDT using two different photosensitizers and light sources. MATERIAL AND METHODS: Standard suspensions of S. mutans were exposed to laser light at 662 nm and Radachlorin(®) or LED 630 nm in combination with Toluidine blue O (TBO). Radiation-only groups, photosensitizer alone, and groups with no treatment were used as controls. Bacterial suspension from each treatment was subcultured onto the surface of Mueller-Hinton agar plates and bacterial growth was assessed. The results were analyzed by analysis of variance and Tukey test (p<0.05). RESULTS: PDT with TBO and Radachlorin(®) significantly reduced S. mutans viability, whereas no difference was observed between two groups of PDT. In the groups treated just with the photosensitizer or irradiated alone, no significant reduction of S. mutans colonies was observed. CONCLUSION: S. mutans colonies were susceptible to either 662 nm laser or LED light in the presence of Radachlorin(®) and TBO respectively with no priority. Faculdade de Odontologia de Bauru da Universidade de São Paulo 2014 /pmc/articles/PMC3956397/ /pubmed/24676576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130038 Text en http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Original Articles HAKIMIHA, Neda KHOEI, Farzaneh BAHADOR, Abbas FEKRAZAD, Reza The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers and light sources |
title | The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to
antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers
and light sources |
title_full | The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to
antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers
and light sources |
title_fullStr | The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to
antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers
and light sources |
title_full_unstemmed | The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to
antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers
and light sources |
title_short | The susceptibility of Streptococcus mutans to
antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers
and light sources |
title_sort | susceptibility of streptococcus mutans to
antibacterial photodynamic therapy: a comparison of two different photosensitizers
and light sources |
topic | Original Articles |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956397/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24676576 http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/1678-775720130038 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hakimihaneda thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT khoeifarzaneh thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT bahadorabbas thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT fekrazadreza thesusceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT hakimihaneda susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT khoeifarzaneh susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT bahadorabbas susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources AT fekrazadreza susceptibilityofstreptococcusmutanstoantibacterialphotodynamictherapyacomparisonoftwodifferentphotosensitizersandlightsources |