Cargando…
Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
BACKGROUND: Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally oc...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Public Library of Science
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090028 |
_version_ | 1782307682309373952 |
---|---|
author | Paoloni, Melissa Webb, Craig Mazcko, Christina Cherba, David Hendricks, William Lana, Susan Ehrhart, E. J. Charles, Brad Fehling, Heather Kumar, Leena Vail, David Henson, Michael Childress, Michael Kitchell, Barbara Kingsley, Christopher Kim, Seungchan Neff, Mark Davis, Barbara Khanna, Chand Trent, Jeffrey |
author_facet | Paoloni, Melissa Webb, Craig Mazcko, Christina Cherba, David Hendricks, William Lana, Susan Ehrhart, E. J. Charles, Brad Fehling, Heather Kumar, Leena Vail, David Henson, Michael Childress, Michael Kitchell, Barbara Kingsley, Christopher Kim, Seungchan Neff, Mark Davis, Barbara Khanna, Chand Trent, Jeffrey |
author_sort | Paoloni, Melissa |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally occurring cancers in pet animals are heterogeneous and thus provide an opportunity to answer questions about these PMed strategies and optimize translation to human patients. In order to realize this opportunity, it is now necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting molecularly-guided analysis of tumors from dogs with naturally occurring cancer in a clinically relevant setting. METHODOLOGY: A proof-of-concept study was conducted by the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium (COTC) to determine if tumor collection, prospective molecular profiling, and PMed report generation within 1 week was feasible in dogs. Thirty-one dogs with cancers of varying histologies were enrolled. Twenty-four of 31 samples (77%) successfully met all predefined QA/QC criteria and were analyzed via Affymetrix gene expression profiling. A subsequent bioinformatics workflow transformed genomic data into a personalized drug report. Average turnaround from biopsy to report generation was 116 hours (4.8 days). Unsupervised clustering of canine tumor expression data clustered by cancer type, but supervised clustering of tumors based on the personalized drug report clustered by drug class rather than cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Collection and turnaround of high quality canine tumor samples, centralized pathology, analyte generation, array hybridization, and bioinformatic analyses matching gene expression to therapeutic options is achievable in a practical clinical window (<1 week). Clustering data show robust signatures by cancer type but also showed patient-to-patient heterogeneity in drug predictions. This lends further support to the inclusion of a heterogeneous population of dogs with cancer into the preclinical modeling of personalized medicine. Future comparative oncology studies optimizing the delivery of PMed strategies may aid cancer drug development. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3956546 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Public Library of Science |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39565462014-03-18 Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials Paoloni, Melissa Webb, Craig Mazcko, Christina Cherba, David Hendricks, William Lana, Susan Ehrhart, E. J. Charles, Brad Fehling, Heather Kumar, Leena Vail, David Henson, Michael Childress, Michael Kitchell, Barbara Kingsley, Christopher Kim, Seungchan Neff, Mark Davis, Barbara Khanna, Chand Trent, Jeffrey PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally occurring cancers in pet animals are heterogeneous and thus provide an opportunity to answer questions about these PMed strategies and optimize translation to human patients. In order to realize this opportunity, it is now necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting molecularly-guided analysis of tumors from dogs with naturally occurring cancer in a clinically relevant setting. METHODOLOGY: A proof-of-concept study was conducted by the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium (COTC) to determine if tumor collection, prospective molecular profiling, and PMed report generation within 1 week was feasible in dogs. Thirty-one dogs with cancers of varying histologies were enrolled. Twenty-four of 31 samples (77%) successfully met all predefined QA/QC criteria and were analyzed via Affymetrix gene expression profiling. A subsequent bioinformatics workflow transformed genomic data into a personalized drug report. Average turnaround from biopsy to report generation was 116 hours (4.8 days). Unsupervised clustering of canine tumor expression data clustered by cancer type, but supervised clustering of tumors based on the personalized drug report clustered by drug class rather than cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Collection and turnaround of high quality canine tumor samples, centralized pathology, analyte generation, array hybridization, and bioinformatic analyses matching gene expression to therapeutic options is achievable in a practical clinical window (<1 week). Clustering data show robust signatures by cancer type but also showed patient-to-patient heterogeneity in drug predictions. This lends further support to the inclusion of a heterogeneous population of dogs with cancer into the preclinical modeling of personalized medicine. Future comparative oncology studies optimizing the delivery of PMed strategies may aid cancer drug development. Public Library of Science 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3956546/ /pubmed/24637659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090028 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Paoloni, Melissa Webb, Craig Mazcko, Christina Cherba, David Hendricks, William Lana, Susan Ehrhart, E. J. Charles, Brad Fehling, Heather Kumar, Leena Vail, David Henson, Michael Childress, Michael Kitchell, Barbara Kingsley, Christopher Kim, Seungchan Neff, Mark Davis, Barbara Khanna, Chand Trent, Jeffrey Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials |
title | Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials |
title_full | Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials |
title_fullStr | Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials |
title_full_unstemmed | Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials |
title_short | Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials |
title_sort | prospective molecular profiling of canine cancers provides a clinically relevant comparative model for evaluating personalized medicine (pmed) trials |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956546/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090028 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paolonimelissa prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT webbcraig prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT mazckochristina prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT cherbadavid prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT hendrickswilliam prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT lanasusan prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT ehrhartej prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT charlesbrad prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT fehlingheather prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT kumarleena prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT vaildavid prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT hensonmichael prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT childressmichael prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT kitchellbarbara prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT kingsleychristopher prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT kimseungchan prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT neffmark prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT davisbarbara prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT khannachand prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials AT trentjeffrey prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials |