Cargando…

Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials

BACKGROUND: Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally oc...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paoloni, Melissa, Webb, Craig, Mazcko, Christina, Cherba, David, Hendricks, William, Lana, Susan, Ehrhart, E. J., Charles, Brad, Fehling, Heather, Kumar, Leena, Vail, David, Henson, Michael, Childress, Michael, Kitchell, Barbara, Kingsley, Christopher, Kim, Seungchan, Neff, Mark, Davis, Barbara, Khanna, Chand, Trent, Jeffrey
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090028
_version_ 1782307682309373952
author Paoloni, Melissa
Webb, Craig
Mazcko, Christina
Cherba, David
Hendricks, William
Lana, Susan
Ehrhart, E. J.
Charles, Brad
Fehling, Heather
Kumar, Leena
Vail, David
Henson, Michael
Childress, Michael
Kitchell, Barbara
Kingsley, Christopher
Kim, Seungchan
Neff, Mark
Davis, Barbara
Khanna, Chand
Trent, Jeffrey
author_facet Paoloni, Melissa
Webb, Craig
Mazcko, Christina
Cherba, David
Hendricks, William
Lana, Susan
Ehrhart, E. J.
Charles, Brad
Fehling, Heather
Kumar, Leena
Vail, David
Henson, Michael
Childress, Michael
Kitchell, Barbara
Kingsley, Christopher
Kim, Seungchan
Neff, Mark
Davis, Barbara
Khanna, Chand
Trent, Jeffrey
author_sort Paoloni, Melissa
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally occurring cancers in pet animals are heterogeneous and thus provide an opportunity to answer questions about these PMed strategies and optimize translation to human patients. In order to realize this opportunity, it is now necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting molecularly-guided analysis of tumors from dogs with naturally occurring cancer in a clinically relevant setting. METHODOLOGY: A proof-of-concept study was conducted by the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium (COTC) to determine if tumor collection, prospective molecular profiling, and PMed report generation within 1 week was feasible in dogs. Thirty-one dogs with cancers of varying histologies were enrolled. Twenty-four of 31 samples (77%) successfully met all predefined QA/QC criteria and were analyzed via Affymetrix gene expression profiling. A subsequent bioinformatics workflow transformed genomic data into a personalized drug report. Average turnaround from biopsy to report generation was 116 hours (4.8 days). Unsupervised clustering of canine tumor expression data clustered by cancer type, but supervised clustering of tumors based on the personalized drug report clustered by drug class rather than cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Collection and turnaround of high quality canine tumor samples, centralized pathology, analyte generation, array hybridization, and bioinformatic analyses matching gene expression to therapeutic options is achievable in a practical clinical window (<1 week). Clustering data show robust signatures by cancer type but also showed patient-to-patient heterogeneity in drug predictions. This lends further support to the inclusion of a heterogeneous population of dogs with cancer into the preclinical modeling of personalized medicine. Future comparative oncology studies optimizing the delivery of PMed strategies may aid cancer drug development.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3956546
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39565462014-03-18 Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials Paoloni, Melissa Webb, Craig Mazcko, Christina Cherba, David Hendricks, William Lana, Susan Ehrhart, E. J. Charles, Brad Fehling, Heather Kumar, Leena Vail, David Henson, Michael Childress, Michael Kitchell, Barbara Kingsley, Christopher Kim, Seungchan Neff, Mark Davis, Barbara Khanna, Chand Trent, Jeffrey PLoS One Research Article BACKGROUND: Molecularly-guided trials (i.e. PMed) now seek to aid clinical decision-making by matching cancer targets with therapeutic options. Progress has been hampered by the lack of cancer models that account for individual-to-individual heterogeneity within and across cancer types. Naturally occurring cancers in pet animals are heterogeneous and thus provide an opportunity to answer questions about these PMed strategies and optimize translation to human patients. In order to realize this opportunity, it is now necessary to demonstrate the feasibility of conducting molecularly-guided analysis of tumors from dogs with naturally occurring cancer in a clinically relevant setting. METHODOLOGY: A proof-of-concept study was conducted by the Comparative Oncology Trials Consortium (COTC) to determine if tumor collection, prospective molecular profiling, and PMed report generation within 1 week was feasible in dogs. Thirty-one dogs with cancers of varying histologies were enrolled. Twenty-four of 31 samples (77%) successfully met all predefined QA/QC criteria and were analyzed via Affymetrix gene expression profiling. A subsequent bioinformatics workflow transformed genomic data into a personalized drug report. Average turnaround from biopsy to report generation was 116 hours (4.8 days). Unsupervised clustering of canine tumor expression data clustered by cancer type, but supervised clustering of tumors based on the personalized drug report clustered by drug class rather than cancer type. CONCLUSIONS: Collection and turnaround of high quality canine tumor samples, centralized pathology, analyte generation, array hybridization, and bioinformatic analyses matching gene expression to therapeutic options is achievable in a practical clinical window (<1 week). Clustering data show robust signatures by cancer type but also showed patient-to-patient heterogeneity in drug predictions. This lends further support to the inclusion of a heterogeneous population of dogs with cancer into the preclinical modeling of personalized medicine. Future comparative oncology studies optimizing the delivery of PMed strategies may aid cancer drug development. Public Library of Science 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3956546/ /pubmed/24637659 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090028 Text en https://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Public Domain declaration, which stipulates that, once placed in the public domain, this work may be freely reproduced, distributed, transmitted, modified, built upon, or otherwise used by anyone for any lawful purpose.
spellingShingle Research Article
Paoloni, Melissa
Webb, Craig
Mazcko, Christina
Cherba, David
Hendricks, William
Lana, Susan
Ehrhart, E. J.
Charles, Brad
Fehling, Heather
Kumar, Leena
Vail, David
Henson, Michael
Childress, Michael
Kitchell, Barbara
Kingsley, Christopher
Kim, Seungchan
Neff, Mark
Davis, Barbara
Khanna, Chand
Trent, Jeffrey
Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
title Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
title_full Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
title_fullStr Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
title_full_unstemmed Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
title_short Prospective Molecular Profiling of Canine Cancers Provides a Clinically Relevant Comparative Model for Evaluating Personalized Medicine (PMed) Trials
title_sort prospective molecular profiling of canine cancers provides a clinically relevant comparative model for evaluating personalized medicine (pmed) trials
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956546/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637659
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0090028
work_keys_str_mv AT paolonimelissa prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT webbcraig prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT mazckochristina prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT cherbadavid prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT hendrickswilliam prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT lanasusan prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT ehrhartej prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT charlesbrad prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT fehlingheather prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT kumarleena prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT vaildavid prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT hensonmichael prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT childressmichael prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT kitchellbarbara prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT kingsleychristopher prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT kimseungchan prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT neffmark prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT davisbarbara prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT khannachand prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials
AT trentjeffrey prospectivemolecularprofilingofcaninecancersprovidesaclinicallyrelevantcomparativemodelforevaluatingpersonalizedmedicinepmedtrials