Cargando…

Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey

The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) as perceived by the patient is an important concept in primary care and psychotherapy. The PDR Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) provides a brief measure of the therapeutic aspects of the PDR in primary care. We assessed the internal and external validity of the German ver...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zenger, Markus, Schaefert, Rainer, van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina, Brähler, Elmar, Häuser, Winfried
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091964
_version_ 1782307721695985664
author Zenger, Markus
Schaefert, Rainer
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina
Brähler, Elmar
Häuser, Winfried
author_facet Zenger, Markus
Schaefert, Rainer
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina
Brähler, Elmar
Häuser, Winfried
author_sort Zenger, Markus
collection PubMed
description The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) as perceived by the patient is an important concept in primary care and psychotherapy. The PDR Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) provides a brief measure of the therapeutic aspects of the PDR in primary care. We assessed the internal and external validity of the German version of the PDRQ-9 in a representative cross-sectional German population survey that included 2,275 persons aged≥14 years who reported consulting with a primary care physician (PCP). The acceptance of the German version of this questionnaire was good. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the PRDQ-9 was unidimensional. The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) of the total score was .95. The corrected item-total correlations were≥.94. The mean satisfaction index of persons with a probable depressive disorder was lower than that of persons without a probable depressive disorder, indicating good discriminative concurrent criterion validity. The correlation coefficient between satisfaction with PDR and satisfaction with pain therapy was r = .51 in 489 persons who reported chronic pain, indicating good convergent validity. Despite the limitation of low variance in the PDRQ-9 total scores, the results indicate that the German version of the PDRQ-9 is a brief questionnaire with good psychometric properties to assess German patients' perceived therapeutic alliance with PCPs in public health research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3956823
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39568232014-03-18 Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey Zenger, Markus Schaefert, Rainer van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina Brähler, Elmar Häuser, Winfried PLoS One Research Article The patient-doctor relationship (PDR) as perceived by the patient is an important concept in primary care and psychotherapy. The PDR Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) provides a brief measure of the therapeutic aspects of the PDR in primary care. We assessed the internal and external validity of the German version of the PDRQ-9 in a representative cross-sectional German population survey that included 2,275 persons aged≥14 years who reported consulting with a primary care physician (PCP). The acceptance of the German version of this questionnaire was good. Confirmatory factor analysis demonstrated that the PRDQ-9 was unidimensional. The internal reliability (Cronbach's α) of the total score was .95. The corrected item-total correlations were≥.94. The mean satisfaction index of persons with a probable depressive disorder was lower than that of persons without a probable depressive disorder, indicating good discriminative concurrent criterion validity. The correlation coefficient between satisfaction with PDR and satisfaction with pain therapy was r = .51 in 489 persons who reported chronic pain, indicating good convergent validity. Despite the limitation of low variance in the PDRQ-9 total scores, the results indicate that the German version of the PDRQ-9 is a brief questionnaire with good psychometric properties to assess German patients' perceived therapeutic alliance with PCPs in public health research. Public Library of Science 2014-03-17 /pmc/articles/PMC3956823/ /pubmed/24637904 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091964 Text en © 2014 Zenger et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are properly credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Zenger, Markus
Schaefert, Rainer
van der Feltz-Cornelis, Christina
Brähler, Elmar
Häuser, Winfried
Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey
title Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey
title_full Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey
title_fullStr Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey
title_full_unstemmed Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey
title_short Validation of the Patient-Doctor-Relationship Questionnaire (PDRQ-9) in a Representative Cross-Sectional German Population Survey
title_sort validation of the patient-doctor-relationship questionnaire (pdrq-9) in a representative cross-sectional german population survey
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3956823/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24637904
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0091964
work_keys_str_mv AT zengermarkus validationofthepatientdoctorrelationshipquestionnairepdrq9inarepresentativecrosssectionalgermanpopulationsurvey
AT schaefertrainer validationofthepatientdoctorrelationshipquestionnairepdrq9inarepresentativecrosssectionalgermanpopulationsurvey
AT vanderfeltzcornelischristina validationofthepatientdoctorrelationshipquestionnairepdrq9inarepresentativecrosssectionalgermanpopulationsurvey
AT brahlerelmar validationofthepatientdoctorrelationshipquestionnairepdrq9inarepresentativecrosssectionalgermanpopulationsurvey
AT hauserwinfried validationofthepatientdoctorrelationshipquestionnairepdrq9inarepresentativecrosssectionalgermanpopulationsurvey