Cargando…

An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile

PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate a screening algorithm for glaucoma in clinical settings. METHODS: Screening included examination of the optic disc for vertical cupping (≥0.4) and asymmetry (≥0.15), Goldmann applanation tonometry (≥21 mmHg, adjusted or unadjusted for central corneal thickness), and a...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mohammadi, S-Farzad, Mirhadi, Sara, Mehrjardi, Hadi Z., Fotouhi, Akbar, Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar, Majdi, Mercede, Moghimi, Sasan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653818
_version_ 1782307757207060480
author Mohammadi, S-Farzad
Mirhadi, Sara
Mehrjardi, Hadi Z.
Fotouhi, Akbar
Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar
Majdi, Mercede
Moghimi, Sasan
author_facet Mohammadi, S-Farzad
Mirhadi, Sara
Mehrjardi, Hadi Z.
Fotouhi, Akbar
Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar
Majdi, Mercede
Moghimi, Sasan
author_sort Mohammadi, S-Farzad
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate a screening algorithm for glaucoma in clinical settings. METHODS: Screening included examination of the optic disc for vertical cupping (≥0.4) and asymmetry (≥0.15), Goldmann applanation tonometry (≥21 mmHg, adjusted or unadjusted for central corneal thickness), and automated perimetry. In the diagnostic step, retinal nerve fiber layer imaging was performed using scanning laser polarimetry. Performance of the screening protocol was assessed in an eye hospital-based program in which 124 non-physician personnel aged 40 years or above were examined. A single ophthalmologist carried out the examinations and in equivocal cases, a glaucoma subspecialist’s opinion was sought. RESULTS: Glaucoma was diagnosed in six cases (prevalence 4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.09) of whom five were new. The likelihood of making a definite diagnosis of glaucoma for those who were screened positively was 8.5 times higher than the estimated baseline risk for the reference population; the positive predictive value of the screening protocol was 30%. Screening excluded 80% of the initial population. CONCLUSION: Application of a formal screening protocol (such as our algorithm or its equivalent) in clinical settings can be helpful in detecting new cases of glaucoma. Preliminary performance assessment of the algorithm showed its applicability and effectiveness in detecting glaucoma among subjects without any visual complaint.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3957037
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39570372014-03-20 An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile Mohammadi, S-Farzad Mirhadi, Sara Mehrjardi, Hadi Z. Fotouhi, Akbar Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar Majdi, Mercede Moghimi, Sasan J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate a screening algorithm for glaucoma in clinical settings. METHODS: Screening included examination of the optic disc for vertical cupping (≥0.4) and asymmetry (≥0.15), Goldmann applanation tonometry (≥21 mmHg, adjusted or unadjusted for central corneal thickness), and automated perimetry. In the diagnostic step, retinal nerve fiber layer imaging was performed using scanning laser polarimetry. Performance of the screening protocol was assessed in an eye hospital-based program in which 124 non-physician personnel aged 40 years or above were examined. A single ophthalmologist carried out the examinations and in equivocal cases, a glaucoma subspecialist’s opinion was sought. RESULTS: Glaucoma was diagnosed in six cases (prevalence 4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.09) of whom five were new. The likelihood of making a definite diagnosis of glaucoma for those who were screened positively was 8.5 times higher than the estimated baseline risk for the reference population; the positive predictive value of the screening protocol was 30%. Screening excluded 80% of the initial population. CONCLUSION: Application of a formal screening protocol (such as our algorithm or its equivalent) in clinical settings can be helpful in detecting new cases of glaucoma. Preliminary performance assessment of the algorithm showed its applicability and effectiveness in detecting glaucoma among subjects without any visual complaint. Ophthalmic Research Center 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3957037/ /pubmed/24653818 Text en © 2013 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Mohammadi, S-Farzad
Mirhadi, Sara
Mehrjardi, Hadi Z.
Fotouhi, Akbar
Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar
Majdi, Mercede
Moghimi, Sasan
An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
title An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
title_full An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
title_fullStr An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
title_full_unstemmed An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
title_short An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
title_sort algorithm for glaucoma screening in clinical settings and its preliminary performance profile
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957037/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653818
work_keys_str_mv AT mohammadisfarzad analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT mirhadisara analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT mehrjardihadiz analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT fotouhiakbar analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT tabatabavakilisahar analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT majdimercede analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT moghimisasan analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT mohammadisfarzad algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT mirhadisara algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT mehrjardihadiz algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT fotouhiakbar algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT tabatabavakilisahar algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT majdimercede algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile
AT moghimisasan algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile