Cargando…
An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile
PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate a screening algorithm for glaucoma in clinical settings. METHODS: Screening included examination of the optic disc for vertical cupping (≥0.4) and asymmetry (≥0.15), Goldmann applanation tonometry (≥21 mmHg, adjusted or unadjusted for central corneal thickness), and a...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Ophthalmic Research Center
2013
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653818 |
_version_ | 1782307757207060480 |
---|---|
author | Mohammadi, S-Farzad Mirhadi, Sara Mehrjardi, Hadi Z. Fotouhi, Akbar Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar Majdi, Mercede Moghimi, Sasan |
author_facet | Mohammadi, S-Farzad Mirhadi, Sara Mehrjardi, Hadi Z. Fotouhi, Akbar Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar Majdi, Mercede Moghimi, Sasan |
author_sort | Mohammadi, S-Farzad |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate a screening algorithm for glaucoma in clinical settings. METHODS: Screening included examination of the optic disc for vertical cupping (≥0.4) and asymmetry (≥0.15), Goldmann applanation tonometry (≥21 mmHg, adjusted or unadjusted for central corneal thickness), and automated perimetry. In the diagnostic step, retinal nerve fiber layer imaging was performed using scanning laser polarimetry. Performance of the screening protocol was assessed in an eye hospital-based program in which 124 non-physician personnel aged 40 years or above were examined. A single ophthalmologist carried out the examinations and in equivocal cases, a glaucoma subspecialist’s opinion was sought. RESULTS: Glaucoma was diagnosed in six cases (prevalence 4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.09) of whom five were new. The likelihood of making a definite diagnosis of glaucoma for those who were screened positively was 8.5 times higher than the estimated baseline risk for the reference population; the positive predictive value of the screening protocol was 30%. Screening excluded 80% of the initial population. CONCLUSION: Application of a formal screening protocol (such as our algorithm or its equivalent) in clinical settings can be helpful in detecting new cases of glaucoma. Preliminary performance assessment of the algorithm showed its applicability and effectiveness in detecting glaucoma among subjects without any visual complaint. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3957037 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2013 |
publisher | Ophthalmic Research Center |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39570372014-03-20 An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile Mohammadi, S-Farzad Mirhadi, Sara Mehrjardi, Hadi Z. Fotouhi, Akbar Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar Majdi, Mercede Moghimi, Sasan J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To devise and evaluate a screening algorithm for glaucoma in clinical settings. METHODS: Screening included examination of the optic disc for vertical cupping (≥0.4) and asymmetry (≥0.15), Goldmann applanation tonometry (≥21 mmHg, adjusted or unadjusted for central corneal thickness), and automated perimetry. In the diagnostic step, retinal nerve fiber layer imaging was performed using scanning laser polarimetry. Performance of the screening protocol was assessed in an eye hospital-based program in which 124 non-physician personnel aged 40 years or above were examined. A single ophthalmologist carried out the examinations and in equivocal cases, a glaucoma subspecialist’s opinion was sought. RESULTS: Glaucoma was diagnosed in six cases (prevalence 4.8%; 95% confidence interval, 0.01-0.09) of whom five were new. The likelihood of making a definite diagnosis of glaucoma for those who were screened positively was 8.5 times higher than the estimated baseline risk for the reference population; the positive predictive value of the screening protocol was 30%. Screening excluded 80% of the initial population. CONCLUSION: Application of a formal screening protocol (such as our algorithm or its equivalent) in clinical settings can be helpful in detecting new cases of glaucoma. Preliminary performance assessment of the algorithm showed its applicability and effectiveness in detecting glaucoma among subjects without any visual complaint. Ophthalmic Research Center 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3957037/ /pubmed/24653818 Text en © 2013 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Mohammadi, S-Farzad Mirhadi, Sara Mehrjardi, Hadi Z. Fotouhi, Akbar Taba Taba Vakili, Sahar Majdi, Mercede Moghimi, Sasan An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile |
title | An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile |
title_full | An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile |
title_fullStr | An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile |
title_full_unstemmed | An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile |
title_short | An Algorithm for Glaucoma Screening in Clinical Settings and Its Preliminary Performance Profile |
title_sort | algorithm for glaucoma screening in clinical settings and its preliminary performance profile |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957037/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653818 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT mohammadisfarzad analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT mirhadisara analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT mehrjardihadiz analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT fotouhiakbar analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT tabatabavakilisahar analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT majdimercede analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT moghimisasan analgorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT mohammadisfarzad algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT mirhadisara algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT mehrjardihadiz algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT fotouhiakbar algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT tabatabavakilisahar algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT majdimercede algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile AT moghimisasan algorithmforglaucomascreeninginclinicalsettingsanditspreliminaryperformanceprofile |