Cargando…

Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery

PURPOSE: To explore functional visual recovery after retinal reattachment surgery employing full-field electroretinography (ffERG). METHODS: In this case series, scotopic and photopic ffERGs were compared 2 days before, and 1, 3 and 6 months after successful scleral buckling for total rhegmatogenous...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Azarmina, Mohsen, Moradian, Siamak, Azarmina, Hossein
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653819
_version_ 1782307757429358592
author Azarmina, Mohsen
Moradian, Siamak
Azarmina, Hossein
author_facet Azarmina, Mohsen
Moradian, Siamak
Azarmina, Hossein
author_sort Azarmina, Mohsen
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To explore functional visual recovery after retinal reattachment surgery employing full-field electroretinography (ffERG). METHODS: In this case series, scotopic and photopic ffERGs were compared 2 days before, and 1, 3 and 6 months after successful scleral buckling for total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Main outcome measures were changes in ERG a-and b-wave amplitudes postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients including 14 male and 6 female subjects with mean age of 34.7±8.2 (range, 23 to 50) years were enrolled. Preoperatively, mean a-wave amplitude in the maximal combined response was 27.5±11.7 mV which was increased to 110.7±41.9 (P<0.001), 175.7±53.1 (p<0.001) and 174.6±51.4 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean preoperative a-wave amplitude of the cone ERG response was 2.1±0.8 mV, which was increased to 2.2±0.9 (P=0.03), 5.1±1.7 (P<0.001) and 5.3±1.6 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean preoperative b-wave amplitude in the maximal combined response was 97.6±28.9 mV which was increased to 179.2±44.9 (P<0.001), 264.2±56.3 (P<0.001) and 267.8±54.2 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean preoperative b-wave amplitude of the cone ERG response was 2.9±0.9 mV which was increased to 3±0.9 (P=0.32), 9.9±1.9 (P<0.001) and 9.8±1.9 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: After retinal reattachment surgery, photoreceptor and visual function show parallel improvement. The scotopic ERG response recovered faster than the photopic response. Incomplete recovery of ERG parameters indicates that photoreceptor cell damage in retinal detachment is not completely reversible.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3957038
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39570382014-03-20 Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery Azarmina, Mohsen Moradian, Siamak Azarmina, Hossein J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To explore functional visual recovery after retinal reattachment surgery employing full-field electroretinography (ffERG). METHODS: In this case series, scotopic and photopic ffERGs were compared 2 days before, and 1, 3 and 6 months after successful scleral buckling for total rhegmatogenous retinal detachment (RRD). Main outcome measures were changes in ERG a-and b-wave amplitudes postoperatively. RESULTS: Twenty eyes of 20 patients including 14 male and 6 female subjects with mean age of 34.7±8.2 (range, 23 to 50) years were enrolled. Preoperatively, mean a-wave amplitude in the maximal combined response was 27.5±11.7 mV which was increased to 110.7±41.9 (P<0.001), 175.7±53.1 (p<0.001) and 174.6±51.4 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean preoperative a-wave amplitude of the cone ERG response was 2.1±0.8 mV, which was increased to 2.2±0.9 (P=0.03), 5.1±1.7 (P<0.001) and 5.3±1.6 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean preoperative b-wave amplitude in the maximal combined response was 97.6±28.9 mV which was increased to 179.2±44.9 (P<0.001), 264.2±56.3 (P<0.001) and 267.8±54.2 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. Mean preoperative b-wave amplitude of the cone ERG response was 2.9±0.9 mV which was increased to 3±0.9 (P=0.32), 9.9±1.9 (P<0.001) and 9.8±1.9 (P<0.001) mV at 1, 3 and 6 months, respectively. CONCLUSION: After retinal reattachment surgery, photoreceptor and visual function show parallel improvement. The scotopic ERG response recovered faster than the photopic response. Incomplete recovery of ERG parameters indicates that photoreceptor cell damage in retinal detachment is not completely reversible. Ophthalmic Research Center 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3957038/ /pubmed/24653819 Text en © 2013 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Azarmina, Mohsen
Moradian, Siamak
Azarmina, Hossein
Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery
title Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery
title_full Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery
title_fullStr Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery
title_full_unstemmed Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery
title_short Electroretinographic Changes Following Retinal Reattachment Surgery
title_sort electroretinographic changes following retinal reattachment surgery
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957038/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653819
work_keys_str_mv AT azarminamohsen electroretinographicchangesfollowingretinalreattachmentsurgery
AT moradiansiamak electroretinographicchangesfollowingretinalreattachmentsurgery
AT azarminahossein electroretinographicchangesfollowingretinalreattachmentsurgery