Cargando…

Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes

PURPOSE: To report the clinical features of eyes with intraretinal foreign bodies (IRFBs) and to evaluate the results of surgical management in these eyes. METHODS: Hospital records of 34 eyes of 33 patients with IRFBs were reviewed. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign bod...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Feghhi, Mostafa, Dehghan, Mohammad-Hossein, Farrahi, Fereydoun, Moghaddasi, Alireza, Rastegarpour, Ali
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Ophthalmic Research Center 2013
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653820
_version_ 1782307757657948160
author Feghhi, Mostafa
Dehghan, Mohammad-Hossein
Farrahi, Fereydoun
Moghaddasi, Alireza
Rastegarpour, Ali
author_facet Feghhi, Mostafa
Dehghan, Mohammad-Hossein
Farrahi, Fereydoun
Moghaddasi, Alireza
Rastegarpour, Ali
author_sort Feghhi, Mostafa
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To report the clinical features of eyes with intraretinal foreign bodies (IRFBs) and to evaluate the results of surgical management in these eyes. METHODS: Hospital records of 34 eyes of 33 patients with IRFBs were reviewed. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign bodies using intraocular forceps or by magnetic extraction. RESULTS: All patients were male with mean age of 28±12.3 years and were followed for a mean period of 24.5±2.3 months. The IRFBs were ferromagnetic in 29 (85.3%) cases and were removed using an external magnet in 13 eyes (38.4%) or intraocular forceps in 21 eyes (61.6%). Laser photocoagulation was performed around the IRFB prior to surgery in 7 (20.6%) eyes. Macular pucker and scars developed in 8 (23.5%) eyes and retinal breaks posterior to the sclerotomy were formed in 12 eyes (35.3%) postoperatively. Final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 12 (35.3%) eyes and 20/200 or better in 23 (67.7%) eyes. Final visual acuity of 20/200 or better had no significant relationship with the site, size, or type of the IRFB or with the interval from trauma to surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of surgical management of IRFBs, anatomic and visual outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in these cases are generally good. The appropriate route of removal may be determined by the type, size, and site of the IRFB. Removal of magnetic IRFBs using external magnets versus intraocular forceps seems to entail comparable results.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3957039
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2013
publisher Ophthalmic Research Center
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39570392014-03-20 Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes Feghhi, Mostafa Dehghan, Mohammad-Hossein Farrahi, Fereydoun Moghaddasi, Alireza Rastegarpour, Ali J Ophthalmic Vis Res Original Article PURPOSE: To report the clinical features of eyes with intraretinal foreign bodies (IRFBs) and to evaluate the results of surgical management in these eyes. METHODS: Hospital records of 34 eyes of 33 patients with IRFBs were reviewed. All eyes underwent pars plana vitrectomy to remove the foreign bodies using intraocular forceps or by magnetic extraction. RESULTS: All patients were male with mean age of 28±12.3 years and were followed for a mean period of 24.5±2.3 months. The IRFBs were ferromagnetic in 29 (85.3%) cases and were removed using an external magnet in 13 eyes (38.4%) or intraocular forceps in 21 eyes (61.6%). Laser photocoagulation was performed around the IRFB prior to surgery in 7 (20.6%) eyes. Macular pucker and scars developed in 8 (23.5%) eyes and retinal breaks posterior to the sclerotomy were formed in 12 eyes (35.3%) postoperatively. Final visual acuity was 20/40 or better in 12 (35.3%) eyes and 20/200 or better in 23 (67.7%) eyes. Final visual acuity of 20/200 or better had no significant relationship with the site, size, or type of the IRFB or with the interval from trauma to surgery. CONCLUSION: Despite the complexity of surgical management of IRFBs, anatomic and visual outcomes of vitreoretinal surgery in these cases are generally good. The appropriate route of removal may be determined by the type, size, and site of the IRFB. Removal of magnetic IRFBs using external magnets versus intraocular forceps seems to entail comparable results. Ophthalmic Research Center 2013-10 /pmc/articles/PMC3957039/ /pubmed/24653820 Text en © 2013 Ophthalmic Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 3.0 Unported License which allows users to read, copy, distribute and make derivative works for non-commercial purposes from the material, as long as the author of the original work is cited properly.
spellingShingle Original Article
Feghhi, Mostafa
Dehghan, Mohammad-Hossein
Farrahi, Fereydoun
Moghaddasi, Alireza
Rastegarpour, Ali
Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
title Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
title_full Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
title_fullStr Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
title_full_unstemmed Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
title_short Intraretinal Foreign Bodies: Surgical Techniques and Outcomes
title_sort intraretinal foreign bodies: surgical techniques and outcomes
topic Original Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3957039/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653820
work_keys_str_mv AT feghhimostafa intraretinalforeignbodiessurgicaltechniquesandoutcomes
AT dehghanmohammadhossein intraretinalforeignbodiessurgicaltechniquesandoutcomes
AT farrahifereydoun intraretinalforeignbodiessurgicaltechniquesandoutcomes
AT moghaddasialireza intraretinalforeignbodiessurgicaltechniquesandoutcomes
AT rastegarpourali intraretinalforeignbodiessurgicaltechniquesandoutcomes