Cargando…
Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution
BACKGROUND: Chromosomal evolution is thought to occur through a random process of breakage and rearrangement that leads to karyotype differences and disruption of gene order. With the availability of both the human and mouse genomic sequences, detailed analysis of the sequence properties underlying...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
BioMed Central
2004
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC395782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15059256 |
_version_ | 1782121333978562560 |
---|---|
author | Bailey, Jeffrey A Baertsch, Robert Kent, W James Haussler, David Eichler, Evan E |
author_facet | Bailey, Jeffrey A Baertsch, Robert Kent, W James Haussler, David Eichler, Evan E |
author_sort | Bailey, Jeffrey A |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Chromosomal evolution is thought to occur through a random process of breakage and rearrangement that leads to karyotype differences and disruption of gene order. With the availability of both the human and mouse genomic sequences, detailed analysis of the sequence properties underlying these breakpoints is now possible. RESULTS: We report an abundance of primate-specific segmental duplications at the breakpoints of syntenic blocks in the human genome. Using conservative criteria, we find that 25% (122/461) of all breakpoints contain ≥ 10 kb of duplicated sequence. This association is highly significant (p < 0.0001) when compared to a simulated random-breakage model. The significance is robust under a variety of parameters, multiple sets of conserved synteny data, and for orthologous breakpoints between and within chromosomes. A comparison of mouse lineage-specific breakpoints since the divergence of rat and mouse showed a similar association with regions associated with segmental duplications in the primate genome. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that segmental duplications are associated with syntenic rearrangements, even when pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions are excluded. However, segmental duplications are not necessarily the cause of the rearrangements. Rather, our analysis supports a nonrandom model of chromosomal evolution that implicates specific regions within the mammalian genome as having been predisposed to both recurrent small-scale duplication and large-scale evolutionary rearrangements. |
format | Text |
id | pubmed-395782 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2004 |
publisher | BioMed Central |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-3957822004-04-24 Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution Bailey, Jeffrey A Baertsch, Robert Kent, W James Haussler, David Eichler, Evan E Genome Biol Research BACKGROUND: Chromosomal evolution is thought to occur through a random process of breakage and rearrangement that leads to karyotype differences and disruption of gene order. With the availability of both the human and mouse genomic sequences, detailed analysis of the sequence properties underlying these breakpoints is now possible. RESULTS: We report an abundance of primate-specific segmental duplications at the breakpoints of syntenic blocks in the human genome. Using conservative criteria, we find that 25% (122/461) of all breakpoints contain ≥ 10 kb of duplicated sequence. This association is highly significant (p < 0.0001) when compared to a simulated random-breakage model. The significance is robust under a variety of parameters, multiple sets of conserved synteny data, and for orthologous breakpoints between and within chromosomes. A comparison of mouse lineage-specific breakpoints since the divergence of rat and mouse showed a similar association with regions associated with segmental duplications in the primate genome. CONCLUSION: These results indicate that segmental duplications are associated with syntenic rearrangements, even when pericentromeric and subtelomeric regions are excluded. However, segmental duplications are not necessarily the cause of the rearrangements. Rather, our analysis supports a nonrandom model of chromosomal evolution that implicates specific regions within the mammalian genome as having been predisposed to both recurrent small-scale duplication and large-scale evolutionary rearrangements. BioMed Central 2004 2004-03-08 /pmc/articles/PMC395782/ /pubmed/15059256 Text en Copyright © 2004 Bailey et al.; licensee BioMed Central Ltd. This is an Open Access article: verbatim copying and redistribution of this article are permitted in all media for any purpose, provided this notice is preserved along with the article's original URL. |
spellingShingle | Research Bailey, Jeffrey A Baertsch, Robert Kent, W James Haussler, David Eichler, Evan E Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
title | Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
title_full | Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
title_fullStr | Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
title_full_unstemmed | Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
title_short | Hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
title_sort | hotspots of mammalian chromosomal evolution |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC395782/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15059256 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT baileyjeffreya hotspotsofmammalianchromosomalevolution AT baertschrobert hotspotsofmammalianchromosomalevolution AT kentwjames hotspotsofmammalianchromosomalevolution AT hausslerdavid hotspotsofmammalianchromosomalevolution AT eichlerevane hotspotsofmammalianchromosomalevolution |