Cargando…

Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping

Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Paulus, Stefan, Behmann, Jan, Mahlein, Anne-Katrin, Plümer, Lutz, Kuhlmann, Heiner
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203001
_version_ 1782307830449045504
author Paulus, Stefan
Behmann, Jan
Mahlein, Anne-Katrin
Plümer, Lutz
Kuhlmann, Heiner
author_facet Paulus, Stefan
Behmann, Jan
Mahlein, Anne-Katrin
Plümer, Lutz
Kuhlmann, Heiner
author_sort Paulus, Stefan
collection PubMed
description Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras for 3D reconstruction requires a significant amount of post-processing, whereas in this context, laser scanning needs huge investment costs. The aim of the present study is a comparison between two current 3D imaging low-cost systems and a high precision close-up laser scanner as a reference method. As low-cost systems, the David laser scanning system and the Microsoft Kinect Device were used. The 3D measuring accuracy of both low-cost sensors was estimated based on the deviations of test specimens. Parameters extracted from the volumetric shape of sugar beet taproots, the leaves of sugar beets and the shape of wheat ears were evaluated. These parameters are compared regarding accuracy and correlation to reference measurements. The evaluation scenarios were chosen with respect to recorded plant parameters in current phenotyping projects. In the present study, low-cost 3D imaging devices have been shown to be highly reliable for the demands of plant phenotyping, with the potential to be implemented in automated application procedures, while saving acquisition costs. Our study confirms that a carefully selected low-cost sensor is able to replace an expensive laser scanner in many plant phenotyping scenarios.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3958231
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39582312014-03-20 Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping Paulus, Stefan Behmann, Jan Mahlein, Anne-Katrin Plümer, Lutz Kuhlmann, Heiner Sensors (Basel) Article Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras for 3D reconstruction requires a significant amount of post-processing, whereas in this context, laser scanning needs huge investment costs. The aim of the present study is a comparison between two current 3D imaging low-cost systems and a high precision close-up laser scanner as a reference method. As low-cost systems, the David laser scanning system and the Microsoft Kinect Device were used. The 3D measuring accuracy of both low-cost sensors was estimated based on the deviations of test specimens. Parameters extracted from the volumetric shape of sugar beet taproots, the leaves of sugar beets and the shape of wheat ears were evaluated. These parameters are compared regarding accuracy and correlation to reference measurements. The evaluation scenarios were chosen with respect to recorded plant parameters in current phenotyping projects. In the present study, low-cost 3D imaging devices have been shown to be highly reliable for the demands of plant phenotyping, with the potential to be implemented in automated application procedures, while saving acquisition costs. Our study confirms that a carefully selected low-cost sensor is able to replace an expensive laser scanner in many plant phenotyping scenarios. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3958231/ /pubmed/24534920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203001 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Paulus, Stefan
Behmann, Jan
Mahlein, Anne-Katrin
Plümer, Lutz
Kuhlmann, Heiner
Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
title Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
title_full Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
title_fullStr Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
title_full_unstemmed Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
title_short Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
title_sort low-cost 3d systems: suitable tools for plant phenotyping
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958231/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534920
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203001
work_keys_str_mv AT paulusstefan lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping
AT behmannjan lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping
AT mahleinannekatrin lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping
AT plumerlutz lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping
AT kuhlmannheiner lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping