Cargando…
Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping
Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras f...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203001 |
_version_ | 1782307830449045504 |
---|---|
author | Paulus, Stefan Behmann, Jan Mahlein, Anne-Katrin Plümer, Lutz Kuhlmann, Heiner |
author_facet | Paulus, Stefan Behmann, Jan Mahlein, Anne-Katrin Plümer, Lutz Kuhlmann, Heiner |
author_sort | Paulus, Stefan |
collection | PubMed |
description | Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras for 3D reconstruction requires a significant amount of post-processing, whereas in this context, laser scanning needs huge investment costs. The aim of the present study is a comparison between two current 3D imaging low-cost systems and a high precision close-up laser scanner as a reference method. As low-cost systems, the David laser scanning system and the Microsoft Kinect Device were used. The 3D measuring accuracy of both low-cost sensors was estimated based on the deviations of test specimens. Parameters extracted from the volumetric shape of sugar beet taproots, the leaves of sugar beets and the shape of wheat ears were evaluated. These parameters are compared regarding accuracy and correlation to reference measurements. The evaluation scenarios were chosen with respect to recorded plant parameters in current phenotyping projects. In the present study, low-cost 3D imaging devices have been shown to be highly reliable for the demands of plant phenotyping, with the potential to be implemented in automated application procedures, while saving acquisition costs. Our study confirms that a carefully selected low-cost sensor is able to replace an expensive laser scanner in many plant phenotyping scenarios. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3958231 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39582312014-03-20 Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping Paulus, Stefan Behmann, Jan Mahlein, Anne-Katrin Plümer, Lutz Kuhlmann, Heiner Sensors (Basel) Article Over the last few years, 3D imaging of plant geometry has become of significant importance for phenotyping and plant breeding. Several sensing techniques, like 3D reconstruction from multiple images and laser scanning, are the methods of choice in different research projects. The use of RGBcameras for 3D reconstruction requires a significant amount of post-processing, whereas in this context, laser scanning needs huge investment costs. The aim of the present study is a comparison between two current 3D imaging low-cost systems and a high precision close-up laser scanner as a reference method. As low-cost systems, the David laser scanning system and the Microsoft Kinect Device were used. The 3D measuring accuracy of both low-cost sensors was estimated based on the deviations of test specimens. Parameters extracted from the volumetric shape of sugar beet taproots, the leaves of sugar beets and the shape of wheat ears were evaluated. These parameters are compared regarding accuracy and correlation to reference measurements. The evaluation scenarios were chosen with respect to recorded plant parameters in current phenotyping projects. In the present study, low-cost 3D imaging devices have been shown to be highly reliable for the demands of plant phenotyping, with the potential to be implemented in automated application procedures, while saving acquisition costs. Our study confirms that a carefully selected low-cost sensor is able to replace an expensive laser scanner in many plant phenotyping scenarios. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2014-02-14 /pmc/articles/PMC3958231/ /pubmed/24534920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203001 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Paulus, Stefan Behmann, Jan Mahlein, Anne-Katrin Plümer, Lutz Kuhlmann, Heiner Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping |
title | Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping |
title_full | Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping |
title_fullStr | Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping |
title_full_unstemmed | Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping |
title_short | Low-Cost 3D Systems: Suitable Tools for Plant Phenotyping |
title_sort | low-cost 3d systems: suitable tools for plant phenotyping |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958231/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24534920 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203001 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT paulusstefan lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping AT behmannjan lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping AT mahleinannekatrin lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping AT plumerlutz lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping AT kuhlmannheiner lowcost3dsystemssuitabletoolsforplantphenotyping |