Cargando…
Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer
Accelerometer-based activity monitors are popular for monitoring physical activity. In this study, we investigated optimal sensor placement for increasing the quality of studies that utilize accelerometer data to assess physical activity. We performed a two-staged study, focused on sensor location a...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203188 |
_version_ | 1782307840466092032 |
---|---|
author | Boerema, Simone T. van Velsen, Lex Schaake, Leendert Tönis, Thijs M. Hermens, Hermie J. |
author_facet | Boerema, Simone T. van Velsen, Lex Schaake, Leendert Tönis, Thijs M. Hermens, Hermie J. |
author_sort | Boerema, Simone T. |
collection | PubMed |
description | Accelerometer-based activity monitors are popular for monitoring physical activity. In this study, we investigated optimal sensor placement for increasing the quality of studies that utilize accelerometer data to assess physical activity. We performed a two-staged study, focused on sensor location and type of mounting. Ten subjects walked at various walking speeds on a treadmill, performed a deskwork protocol, and walked on level ground, while simultaneously wearing five ProMove2 sensors with a snug fit on an elastic waist belt. We found that sensor location, type of activity, and their interaction-effect affected sensor output. The most lateral positions on the waist belt were the least sensitive for interference. The effect of mounting was explored, by making two subjects repeat the experimental protocol with sensors more loosely fitted to the elastic belt. The loose fit resulted in lower sensor output, except for the deskwork protocol, where output was higher. In order to increase the reliability and to reduce the variability of sensor output, researchers should place activity sensors on the most lateral position of a participant's waist belt. If the sensor hampers free movement, it may be positioned slightly more forward on the belt. Finally, sensors should be fitted tightly to the body. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3958275 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39582752014-03-20 Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer Boerema, Simone T. van Velsen, Lex Schaake, Leendert Tönis, Thijs M. Hermens, Hermie J. Sensors (Basel) Article Accelerometer-based activity monitors are popular for monitoring physical activity. In this study, we investigated optimal sensor placement for increasing the quality of studies that utilize accelerometer data to assess physical activity. We performed a two-staged study, focused on sensor location and type of mounting. Ten subjects walked at various walking speeds on a treadmill, performed a deskwork protocol, and walked on level ground, while simultaneously wearing five ProMove2 sensors with a snug fit on an elastic waist belt. We found that sensor location, type of activity, and their interaction-effect affected sensor output. The most lateral positions on the waist belt were the least sensitive for interference. The effect of mounting was explored, by making two subjects repeat the experimental protocol with sensors more loosely fitted to the elastic belt. The loose fit resulted in lower sensor output, except for the deskwork protocol, where output was higher. In order to increase the reliability and to reduce the variability of sensor output, researchers should place activity sensors on the most lateral position of a participant's waist belt. If the sensor hampers free movement, it may be positioned slightly more forward on the belt. Finally, sensors should be fitted tightly to the body. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2014-02-18 /pmc/articles/PMC3958275/ /pubmed/24553085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203188 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Boerema, Simone T. van Velsen, Lex Schaake, Leendert Tönis, Thijs M. Hermens, Hermie J. Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer |
title | Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer |
title_full | Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer |
title_fullStr | Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer |
title_full_unstemmed | Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer |
title_short | Optimal Sensor Placement for Measuring Physical Activity with a 3D Accelerometer |
title_sort | optimal sensor placement for measuring physical activity with a 3d accelerometer |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958275/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24553085 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/s140203188 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT boeremasimonet optimalsensorplacementformeasuringphysicalactivitywitha3daccelerometer AT vanvelsenlex optimalsensorplacementformeasuringphysicalactivitywitha3daccelerometer AT schaakeleendert optimalsensorplacementformeasuringphysicalactivitywitha3daccelerometer AT tonisthijsm optimalsensorplacementformeasuringphysicalactivitywitha3daccelerometer AT hermenshermiej optimalsensorplacementformeasuringphysicalactivitywitha3daccelerometer |