Cargando…
Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion?
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of implant removal of percutaneous short segment fixation after vertebral fracture consolidation in terms of motion preservation. METHODS: Between May 2007 and January 2011, 44 patients underwent percutaneous short segment screw fixat...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
The Korean Neurosurgical Society
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.55.2.73 |
_version_ | 1782307900900769792 |
---|---|
author | Kim, Hyeun Sung Kim, Seok Won Ju, Chang Il Wang, Hui Sun Lee, Sung Myung Kim, Dong Min |
author_facet | Kim, Hyeun Sung Kim, Seok Won Ju, Chang Il Wang, Hui Sun Lee, Sung Myung Kim, Dong Min |
author_sort | Kim, Hyeun Sung |
collection | PubMed |
description | OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of implant removal of percutaneous short segment fixation after vertebral fracture consolidation in terms of motion preservation. METHODS: Between May 2007 and January 2011, 44 patients underwent percutaneous short segment screw fixation due to a thoracolumbar burst fracture. Sixteen of these patients, who underwent implant removal 12 months after screw fixation, were enrolled in this study. Motor power was intact in all patients, despite significant vertebral height loss and canal compromise. The patients were divided into two groups by degree of osteoporosis : Group A (n=8), the non-osteoporotic group, and Group B (n=8), the osteoporotic group. Imaging and clinical findings including vertebral height loss, kyphotic angle, range of motion (ROM), and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant pain relief was achieved in both groups at final follow-up versus preoperative values. In terms of vertebral height loss, both groups showed significant improvement at 12 months after screw fixation and restored vertebral height was maintained to final follow-up in spite of some correction loss. ROM (measured using Cobb's method) in flexion and extension in Group A was 10.5° (19.5/9.0°) at last follow-up, and in Group B was 10.2° (18.8/8.6°) at last follow-up. Both groups showed marked improvement in ROM as compared with the screw fixation state, which was considered motionless. CONCLUSION: Removal of percutaneous implants after vertebral fracture consolidation can be an effective treatment to preserve motion regardless of osteoporosis for thoracolumbar burst fractures. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3958576 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | The Korean Neurosurgical Society |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39585762014-03-20 Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? Kim, Hyeun Sung Kim, Seok Won Ju, Chang Il Wang, Hui Sun Lee, Sung Myung Kim, Dong Min J Korean Neurosurg Soc Clinical Article OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy of implant removal of percutaneous short segment fixation after vertebral fracture consolidation in terms of motion preservation. METHODS: Between May 2007 and January 2011, 44 patients underwent percutaneous short segment screw fixation due to a thoracolumbar burst fracture. Sixteen of these patients, who underwent implant removal 12 months after screw fixation, were enrolled in this study. Motor power was intact in all patients, despite significant vertebral height loss and canal compromise. The patients were divided into two groups by degree of osteoporosis : Group A (n=8), the non-osteoporotic group, and Group B (n=8), the osteoporotic group. Imaging and clinical findings including vertebral height loss, kyphotic angle, range of motion (ROM), and complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Significant pain relief was achieved in both groups at final follow-up versus preoperative values. In terms of vertebral height loss, both groups showed significant improvement at 12 months after screw fixation and restored vertebral height was maintained to final follow-up in spite of some correction loss. ROM (measured using Cobb's method) in flexion and extension in Group A was 10.5° (19.5/9.0°) at last follow-up, and in Group B was 10.2° (18.8/8.6°) at last follow-up. Both groups showed marked improvement in ROM as compared with the screw fixation state, which was considered motionless. CONCLUSION: Removal of percutaneous implants after vertebral fracture consolidation can be an effective treatment to preserve motion regardless of osteoporosis for thoracolumbar burst fractures. The Korean Neurosurgical Society 2014-02 2014-02-28 /pmc/articles/PMC3958576/ /pubmed/24653799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.55.2.73 Text en Copyright © 2014 The Korean Neurosurgical Society http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Article Kim, Hyeun Sung Kim, Seok Won Ju, Chang Il Wang, Hui Sun Lee, Sung Myung Kim, Dong Min Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? |
title | Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? |
title_full | Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? |
title_fullStr | Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? |
title_full_unstemmed | Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? |
title_short | Implant Removal after Percutaneous Short Segment Fixation for Thoracolumbar Burst Fracture : Does It Preserve Motion? |
title_sort | implant removal after percutaneous short segment fixation for thoracolumbar burst fracture : does it preserve motion? |
topic | Clinical Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958576/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24653799 http://dx.doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2014.55.2.73 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT kimhyeunsung implantremovalafterpercutaneousshortsegmentfixationforthoracolumbarburstfracturedoesitpreservemotion AT kimseokwon implantremovalafterpercutaneousshortsegmentfixationforthoracolumbarburstfracturedoesitpreservemotion AT juchangil implantremovalafterpercutaneousshortsegmentfixationforthoracolumbarburstfracturedoesitpreservemotion AT wanghuisun implantremovalafterpercutaneousshortsegmentfixationforthoracolumbarburstfracturedoesitpreservemotion AT leesungmyung implantremovalafterpercutaneousshortsegmentfixationforthoracolumbarburstfracturedoesitpreservemotion AT kimdongmin implantremovalafterpercutaneousshortsegmentfixationforthoracolumbarburstfracturedoesitpreservemotion |