Cargando…
Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
This study investigated implicit socioemotional modulation of working memory (WM) in the context of symptom severity and functional status in individuals with psychosis (N = 21). A delayed match-to-sample task was modified wherein task-irrelevant facial distracters were presented early and briefly d...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Hindawi Publishing Corporation
2014
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320948 |
_version_ | 1782307918011432960 |
---|---|
author | Mano, Quintino R. Brown, Gregory G. Mirzakhanian, Heline Bolden, Khalima Cadenhead, Kristen S. Light, Gregory A. |
author_facet | Mano, Quintino R. Brown, Gregory G. Mirzakhanian, Heline Bolden, Khalima Cadenhead, Kristen S. Light, Gregory A. |
author_sort | Mano, Quintino R. |
collection | PubMed |
description | This study investigated implicit socioemotional modulation of working memory (WM) in the context of symptom severity and functional status in individuals with psychosis (N = 21). A delayed match-to-sample task was modified wherein task-irrelevant facial distracters were presented early and briefly during the rehearsal of pseudoword memoranda that varied incrementally in load size (1, 2, or 3 syllables). Facial distracters displayed happy, sad, or emotionally neutral expressions. Implicit socioemotional modulation of WM was indexed by subtracting task accuracy on nonfacial geometrical distraction trials from facial distraction trials. Results indicated that the amount of implicit socioemotional modulation of high WM load accuracy was significantly associated with negative symptoms (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), role functioning (r = −0.50, P < 0.05), social functioning (r = −0.55, P < 0.01), and global assessment of functioning (r = −0.53, P < 0.05). Specifically, greater attentional distraction of high WM load was associated with less severe symptoms and functional impairment. This study demonstrates the importance of the WM-socioemotional interface in influencing clinical and psychosocial functional status in psychosis. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-3958678 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2014 |
publisher | Hindawi Publishing Corporation |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-39586782014-04-10 Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis Mano, Quintino R. Brown, Gregory G. Mirzakhanian, Heline Bolden, Khalima Cadenhead, Kristen S. Light, Gregory A. Schizophr Res Treatment Clinical Study This study investigated implicit socioemotional modulation of working memory (WM) in the context of symptom severity and functional status in individuals with psychosis (N = 21). A delayed match-to-sample task was modified wherein task-irrelevant facial distracters were presented early and briefly during the rehearsal of pseudoword memoranda that varied incrementally in load size (1, 2, or 3 syllables). Facial distracters displayed happy, sad, or emotionally neutral expressions. Implicit socioemotional modulation of WM was indexed by subtracting task accuracy on nonfacial geometrical distraction trials from facial distraction trials. Results indicated that the amount of implicit socioemotional modulation of high WM load accuracy was significantly associated with negative symptoms (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), role functioning (r = −0.50, P < 0.05), social functioning (r = −0.55, P < 0.01), and global assessment of functioning (r = −0.53, P < 0.05). Specifically, greater attentional distraction of high WM load was associated with less severe symptoms and functional impairment. This study demonstrates the importance of the WM-socioemotional interface in influencing clinical and psychosocial functional status in psychosis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3958678/ /pubmed/24724026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320948 Text en Copyright © 2014 Quintino R. Mano et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Study Mano, Quintino R. Brown, Gregory G. Mirzakhanian, Heline Bolden, Khalima Cadenhead, Kristen S. Light, Gregory A. Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis |
title | Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis |
title_full | Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis |
title_fullStr | Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis |
title_full_unstemmed | Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis |
title_short | Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis |
title_sort | not all distraction is bad: working memory vulnerability to implicit socioemotional distraction correlates with negative symptoms and functional impairment in psychosis |
topic | Clinical Study |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958678/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320948 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT manoquintinor notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis AT browngregoryg notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis AT mirzakhanianheline notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis AT boldenkhalima notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis AT cadenheadkristens notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis AT lightgregorya notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis |