Cargando…

Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis

This study investigated implicit socioemotional modulation of working memory (WM) in the context of symptom severity and functional status in individuals with psychosis (N = 21). A delayed match-to-sample task was modified wherein task-irrelevant facial distracters were presented early and briefly d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mano, Quintino R., Brown, Gregory G., Mirzakhanian, Heline, Bolden, Khalima, Cadenhead, Kristen S., Light, Gregory A.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320948
_version_ 1782307918011432960
author Mano, Quintino R.
Brown, Gregory G.
Mirzakhanian, Heline
Bolden, Khalima
Cadenhead, Kristen S.
Light, Gregory A.
author_facet Mano, Quintino R.
Brown, Gregory G.
Mirzakhanian, Heline
Bolden, Khalima
Cadenhead, Kristen S.
Light, Gregory A.
author_sort Mano, Quintino R.
collection PubMed
description This study investigated implicit socioemotional modulation of working memory (WM) in the context of symptom severity and functional status in individuals with psychosis (N = 21). A delayed match-to-sample task was modified wherein task-irrelevant facial distracters were presented early and briefly during the rehearsal of pseudoword memoranda that varied incrementally in load size (1, 2, or 3 syllables). Facial distracters displayed happy, sad, or emotionally neutral expressions. Implicit socioemotional modulation of WM was indexed by subtracting task accuracy on nonfacial geometrical distraction trials from facial distraction trials. Results indicated that the amount of implicit socioemotional modulation of high WM load accuracy was significantly associated with negative symptoms (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), role functioning (r = −0.50, P < 0.05), social functioning (r = −0.55, P < 0.01), and global assessment of functioning (r = −0.53, P < 0.05). Specifically, greater attentional distraction of high WM load was associated with less severe symptoms and functional impairment. This study demonstrates the importance of the WM-socioemotional interface in influencing clinical and psychosocial functional status in psychosis.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3958678
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Hindawi Publishing Corporation
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39586782014-04-10 Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis Mano, Quintino R. Brown, Gregory G. Mirzakhanian, Heline Bolden, Khalima Cadenhead, Kristen S. Light, Gregory A. Schizophr Res Treatment Clinical Study This study investigated implicit socioemotional modulation of working memory (WM) in the context of symptom severity and functional status in individuals with psychosis (N = 21). A delayed match-to-sample task was modified wherein task-irrelevant facial distracters were presented early and briefly during the rehearsal of pseudoword memoranda that varied incrementally in load size (1, 2, or 3 syllables). Facial distracters displayed happy, sad, or emotionally neutral expressions. Implicit socioemotional modulation of WM was indexed by subtracting task accuracy on nonfacial geometrical distraction trials from facial distraction trials. Results indicated that the amount of implicit socioemotional modulation of high WM load accuracy was significantly associated with negative symptoms (r = 0.63, P < 0.01), role functioning (r = −0.50, P < 0.05), social functioning (r = −0.55, P < 0.01), and global assessment of functioning (r = −0.53, P < 0.05). Specifically, greater attentional distraction of high WM load was associated with less severe symptoms and functional impairment. This study demonstrates the importance of the WM-socioemotional interface in influencing clinical and psychosocial functional status in psychosis. Hindawi Publishing Corporation 2014 2014-02-27 /pmc/articles/PMC3958678/ /pubmed/24724026 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320948 Text en Copyright © 2014 Quintino R. Mano et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Study
Mano, Quintino R.
Brown, Gregory G.
Mirzakhanian, Heline
Bolden, Khalima
Cadenhead, Kristen S.
Light, Gregory A.
Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
title Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
title_full Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
title_fullStr Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
title_full_unstemmed Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
title_short Not All Distraction Is Bad: Working Memory Vulnerability to Implicit Socioemotional Distraction Correlates with Negative Symptoms and Functional Impairment in Psychosis
title_sort not all distraction is bad: working memory vulnerability to implicit socioemotional distraction correlates with negative symptoms and functional impairment in psychosis
topic Clinical Study
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958678/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24724026
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/320948
work_keys_str_mv AT manoquintinor notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis
AT browngregoryg notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis
AT mirzakhanianheline notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis
AT boldenkhalima notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis
AT cadenheadkristens notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis
AT lightgregorya notalldistractionisbadworkingmemoryvulnerabilitytoimplicitsocioemotionaldistractioncorrelateswithnegativesymptomsandfunctionalimpairmentinpsychosis