Cargando…

Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification

The possibility of nanoparticle (NP) uptake to the human central nervous system is a major concern. Recent reports showed that in animal models, nanoparticles (NPs) passed through the blood–brain barrier (BBB). For the safe use of NPs, it is imperative to evaluate the permeability of NPs through the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hanada, Sanshiro, Fujioka, Kouki, Inoue, Yuriko, Kanaya, Fumihide, Manome, Yoshinobu, Yamamoto, Kenji
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24469316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms15021812
_version_ 1782307949407895552
author Hanada, Sanshiro
Fujioka, Kouki
Inoue, Yuriko
Kanaya, Fumihide
Manome, Yoshinobu
Yamamoto, Kenji
author_facet Hanada, Sanshiro
Fujioka, Kouki
Inoue, Yuriko
Kanaya, Fumihide
Manome, Yoshinobu
Yamamoto, Kenji
author_sort Hanada, Sanshiro
collection PubMed
description The possibility of nanoparticle (NP) uptake to the human central nervous system is a major concern. Recent reports showed that in animal models, nanoparticles (NPs) passed through the blood–brain barrier (BBB). For the safe use of NPs, it is imperative to evaluate the permeability of NPs through the BBB. Here we used a commercially available in vitro BBB model to evaluate the permeability of NPs for a rapid, easy and reproducible assay. The model is reconstructed by culturing both primary rat brain endothelial cells and pericytes to support the tight junctions of endothelial cells. We used the permeability coefficient (P(app)) to determine the permeability of NPs. The size dependency results, using fluorescent silica NPs (30, 100, and 400 nm), revealed that the P(app) for the 30 nm NPs was higher than those of the larger silica. The surface charge dependency results using Qdots(®) (amino-, carboxyl-, and PEGylated-Qdots), showed that more amino-Qdots passed through the model than the other Qdots. Usage of serum-containing buffer in the model resulted in an overall reduction of permeability. In conclusion, although additional developments are desired to elucidate the NPs transportation, we showed that the BBB model could be useful as a tool to test the permeability of nanoparticles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3958822
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI)
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39588222014-03-20 Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification Hanada, Sanshiro Fujioka, Kouki Inoue, Yuriko Kanaya, Fumihide Manome, Yoshinobu Yamamoto, Kenji Int J Mol Sci Article The possibility of nanoparticle (NP) uptake to the human central nervous system is a major concern. Recent reports showed that in animal models, nanoparticles (NPs) passed through the blood–brain barrier (BBB). For the safe use of NPs, it is imperative to evaluate the permeability of NPs through the BBB. Here we used a commercially available in vitro BBB model to evaluate the permeability of NPs for a rapid, easy and reproducible assay. The model is reconstructed by culturing both primary rat brain endothelial cells and pericytes to support the tight junctions of endothelial cells. We used the permeability coefficient (P(app)) to determine the permeability of NPs. The size dependency results, using fluorescent silica NPs (30, 100, and 400 nm), revealed that the P(app) for the 30 nm NPs was higher than those of the larger silica. The surface charge dependency results using Qdots(®) (amino-, carboxyl-, and PEGylated-Qdots), showed that more amino-Qdots passed through the model than the other Qdots. Usage of serum-containing buffer in the model resulted in an overall reduction of permeability. In conclusion, although additional developments are desired to elucidate the NPs transportation, we showed that the BBB model could be useful as a tool to test the permeability of nanoparticles. Molecular Diversity Preservation International (MDPI) 2014-01-24 /pmc/articles/PMC3958822/ /pubmed/24469316 http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms15021812 Text en © 2014 by the authors; licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/ This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Hanada, Sanshiro
Fujioka, Kouki
Inoue, Yuriko
Kanaya, Fumihide
Manome, Yoshinobu
Yamamoto, Kenji
Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification
title Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification
title_full Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification
title_fullStr Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification
title_full_unstemmed Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification
title_short Cell-Based in Vitro Blood–Brain Barrier Model Can Rapidly Evaluate Nanoparticles’ Brain Permeability in Association with Particle Size and Surface Modification
title_sort cell-based in vitro blood–brain barrier model can rapidly evaluate nanoparticles’ brain permeability in association with particle size and surface modification
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3958822/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24469316
http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijms15021812
work_keys_str_mv AT hanadasanshiro cellbasedinvitrobloodbrainbarriermodelcanrapidlyevaluatenanoparticlesbrainpermeabilityinassociationwithparticlesizeandsurfacemodification
AT fujiokakouki cellbasedinvitrobloodbrainbarriermodelcanrapidlyevaluatenanoparticlesbrainpermeabilityinassociationwithparticlesizeandsurfacemodification
AT inoueyuriko cellbasedinvitrobloodbrainbarriermodelcanrapidlyevaluatenanoparticlesbrainpermeabilityinassociationwithparticlesizeandsurfacemodification
AT kanayafumihide cellbasedinvitrobloodbrainbarriermodelcanrapidlyevaluatenanoparticlesbrainpermeabilityinassociationwithparticlesizeandsurfacemodification
AT manomeyoshinobu cellbasedinvitrobloodbrainbarriermodelcanrapidlyevaluatenanoparticlesbrainpermeabilityinassociationwithparticlesizeandsurfacemodification
AT yamamotokenji cellbasedinvitrobloodbrainbarriermodelcanrapidlyevaluatenanoparticlesbrainpermeabilityinassociationwithparticlesizeandsurfacemodification