Cargando…

Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method

Following a radiation incident, preliminary dose estimates made by γ-H2AX foci analysis can supplement the early triage of casualties based on clinical symptoms. Sample processing time is important when many individuals need to be rapidly assessed. A protocol was therefore developed for high sample...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Moquet, Jayne, Barnard, Stephen, Rothkamm, Kai
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: PeerJ Inc. 2014
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688860
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.282
_version_ 1782308239631712256
author Moquet, Jayne
Barnard, Stephen
Rothkamm, Kai
author_facet Moquet, Jayne
Barnard, Stephen
Rothkamm, Kai
author_sort Moquet, Jayne
collection PubMed
description Following a radiation incident, preliminary dose estimates made by γ-H2AX foci analysis can supplement the early triage of casualties based on clinical symptoms. Sample processing time is important when many individuals need to be rapidly assessed. A protocol was therefore developed for high sample throughput that requires less than 0.1 ml blood, thus potentially enabling finger prick sampling. The technique combines red blood cell lysis and leukocyte fixation in one step on a 96 well plate, in contrast to the routine protocol, where lymphocytes in larger blood volumes are typically separated by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation with subsequent washing and fixation steps. The rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ method reduced the estimated sample processing time for 96 samples to about 4 h compared to 15 h using the routine protocol. However, scoring 20 cells in 96 samples prepared by the rapid protocol took longer than for the routine method (3.1 versus 1.5 h at zero dose; 7.0 versus 6.1 h for irradiated samples). Similar foci yields were scored for both protocols and consistent dose estimates were obtained for samples exposed to 0, 0.2, 0.6, 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 4.3 Gy of 250 kVp X-rays at 0.5 Gy/min and incubated for 2 h. Linear regression coefficients were 0.87 ± 0.06 (R(2) = 97.6%) and 0.85 ± 0.05 (R(2) = 98.3%) for estimated versus actual doses for the routine and lyse/fix method, respectively. The lyse/fix protocol can therefore facilitate high throughput processing for γ-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents, at the cost of somewhat longer foci scoring times.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-3961158
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2014
publisher PeerJ Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-39611582014-03-31 Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method Moquet, Jayne Barnard, Stephen Rothkamm, Kai PeerJ Cell Biology Following a radiation incident, preliminary dose estimates made by γ-H2AX foci analysis can supplement the early triage of casualties based on clinical symptoms. Sample processing time is important when many individuals need to be rapidly assessed. A protocol was therefore developed for high sample throughput that requires less than 0.1 ml blood, thus potentially enabling finger prick sampling. The technique combines red blood cell lysis and leukocyte fixation in one step on a 96 well plate, in contrast to the routine protocol, where lymphocytes in larger blood volumes are typically separated by Ficoll density gradient centrifugation with subsequent washing and fixation steps. The rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ method reduced the estimated sample processing time for 96 samples to about 4 h compared to 15 h using the routine protocol. However, scoring 20 cells in 96 samples prepared by the rapid protocol took longer than for the routine method (3.1 versus 1.5 h at zero dose; 7.0 versus 6.1 h for irradiated samples). Similar foci yields were scored for both protocols and consistent dose estimates were obtained for samples exposed to 0, 0.2, 0.6, 1.1, 1.2, 2.1 and 4.3 Gy of 250 kVp X-rays at 0.5 Gy/min and incubated for 2 h. Linear regression coefficients were 0.87 ± 0.06 (R(2) = 97.6%) and 0.85 ± 0.05 (R(2) = 98.3%) for estimated versus actual doses for the routine and lyse/fix method, respectively. The lyse/fix protocol can therefore facilitate high throughput processing for γ-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents, at the cost of somewhat longer foci scoring times. PeerJ Inc. 2014-03-06 /pmc/articles/PMC3961158/ /pubmed/24688860 http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.282 Text en © 2014 Moquet et al. http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Open Government License (http://www.nationalarchives.gov.uk/doc/open-government-licence/) .
spellingShingle Cell Biology
Moquet, Jayne
Barnard, Stephen
Rothkamm, Kai
Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
title Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
title_full Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
title_fullStr Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
title_full_unstemmed Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
title_short Gamma-H2AX biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
title_sort gamma-h2ax biodosimetry for use in large scale radiation incidents: comparison of a rapid ‘96 well lyse/fix’ protocol with a routine method
topic Cell Biology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3961158/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24688860
http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.282
work_keys_str_mv AT moquetjayne gammah2axbiodosimetryforuseinlargescaleradiationincidentscomparisonofarapid96welllysefixprotocolwitharoutinemethod
AT barnardstephen gammah2axbiodosimetryforuseinlargescaleradiationincidentscomparisonofarapid96welllysefixprotocolwitharoutinemethod
AT rothkammkai gammah2axbiodosimetryforuseinlargescaleradiationincidentscomparisonofarapid96welllysefixprotocolwitharoutinemethod